It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Vitruvian
I wonder - shouldn't the flag cast a shadow?
Originally posted by HomerinNC
My question is this: WHY would they have hoaxed the landing? What would have been the reason?
Originally posted by Vitruvian
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
But compare if you will the length of the yellow lines that reasonably determine the distance of a shadow in one of the images but not in the other.
edit on 31-7-2012 by Vitruvian because: editing pic added
Originally posted by Vitruvian
I wonder - shouldn't the flag cast a shadow? Or do NASA flags disobey the laws of optics as well as all the other known physical laws of the universe..........
Is it possible that NASA has gone "shopping" here?
Originally posted by Vitruvian
JRA states wrongly I might add "Photoshop didn't come around till about 1990. The Apollo 11 - 17 happened during 1969 - 1972. So no, they could not have been Photoshopped."
PhotoShop is a GENERIC TERM - Photographic manipulation was certainly very well known to all NASA fraudsters during the time frame we are referring to here.
Fortunately for us you posted a perfect example of a "Moonie" blunder The HR photo you linked us to was very helpful to the "Hoaxers" for it serves to prove a vry good point - whch is - there is NO shadow from the flag and or its pole as there should be, and where any reasonably intelligent person would expect one to be.
edit on 31-7-2012 by Vitruvian because: editing
Originally posted by Vitruvian
But I don't see the shadow - not because I am trying to not see it. I don't see it because its not there.
Originally posted by Vitruvian
JRA states wrongly I might add "Photoshop didn't come around till about 1990. The Apollo 11 - 17 happened during 1969 - 1972. So no, they could not have been Photoshopped."
PhotoShop is a GENERIC TERM - Photographic manipulation was certainly very well known to all NASA fraudsters during the time frame we are referring to here.
Originally posted by HomerinNC
My question is this: WHY would they have hoaxed the landing? What would have been the reason?
Originally posted by captainpudding
The entire moon hoax is 100% predicated on "I don't understand this, therefore it's fake" and since ... they believe that they know everything ... anything you tell them that contradicts what they came up with on their own, can't be true. Even if every text book, journal and research paper done in the last 500 years tells them they're wrong, they won't believe it because there's a global conspiracy against them. That's why they hold on to their ignorance with such passion as the alternative is admitting to themselves they're not nearly as smart as they think they are.
Originally posted by Saint Exupery
Although protocol usually instructs us to "attack the arguement, not the person making it"