It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by excelents
reply to post by Frira
There was a news item on the 2 am news this morning here in the UK on Radio 4, I'll check out the BBC iplayer and make a recording.
The news announcer stated that several new high res pictures were to be released or had been released showing the landing sites, rover and various tracks etc in pristine condition.
The announcer then made a strange annotation that these had been made several of the Apollo missions that had landed on the moon, he reeled of several of the Apollo numbers including Apollo 13 which I thought exploded etc and they never made it to the Moon.
It may of course been a slip of the tongue or a typo, it amused me though so I'll head off and see if I can find a clip.
Edit : Radio 4 Show not available.edit on 7-9-2011 by excelents because: (no reason given)
But the comments above just really steam me. We KNEW that we could lose our heroes in horrible fashion. We LOST some of our heroes in horrible fashion. It was crushing. It was like losing *family* for God's sake. We had grown up from childhood with these guys--AND their wives and kids. Anyway, the point is that, as a nation, we recovered from the tragedy, and we restored our spirit, and we got up and slogged on. You'll never experience this country coming together like they did during Apollo 13. We were--again, as a nation--an absolute basket-case. We just couldn't believe that the worst could happen again; we WOULDN'T believe it. We, this nation--and god only knows how many people in how many countries around the world--were pulling for a miracle. And we got it.
There WAS NO FAKED FOOTAGE. Goddammit, if there were some way I could take you people and carry you to the moon and rub your faces in their footsteps--HARD!--believe me, I'd do it! And you wouldn't deserve it
Originally posted by Illustronic
reply to post by Frira
...And we are to believe these folks know something Einstein can't by 'thinking out of the box'. Well the box let your cognitive thinking out and Pandora is in your little dark room with her box open too.
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by Phage
Phage, you disappoint me. The 2nd video in Athin's list, freeze it at 23 seconds. That is NOT the antenna reflecting, we can all see the antenna, no need to point that out as they flash often enough in most NASA films. Its a silvery shiny thing. I would guess that the antenna on the backpack does not extend 1 metre (3 feet) or more into the air. Unfortunately Youtube seems good at pulling all the so-called Hoax vids where credible evidence is presented using NASA videos and images. When they pull them so fast we can barely post them, its pointless.
Ionizing radiation does not have a frequency? This little picture:
would seem to disagree with you. If it moves/vibrates, it has frequency, period. Sound, light, radiation of whichever form you would care to mention even though it happens not to be mentioned in some graphs, is probably due more to our inability to construct devices that can measure things that 'high'. And me being useless at Physics and still am. Off-topic, look how close mobile phones and microwave cookers are. Boiled testes anyone? I am not an expert though and of that I am the first to admit. Back on topic...
The whole NASA thing seems so strangely linked to some American people's psyche judging from many of the OS'ers replies here that its just scary, but there is a fine line between pride and nationalism and... I'll let you fill in the dots. (No I won't. Google youtube for "14 signs of fascism" for corroboration. It comes from work done by someone who has studied and earned a title, not some basement dweller like myself who presumably only watches youtube vids all day. ) Back on topic again...
I'd be the first to admit that none of us really "know". But then again, 'They' are good at keeping it nice and covered. It must be sad that people now dare to question (the sheer audacity!) whereas before they just swallowed it if it was on the TV. Internet helps us exchange and truly question ideas and that is a relatively new thing, at least on the scale it is now possible.
"I saw it on TV", "My dad worked for NASA", so it must be true? No disrespect to the OP or his father either (NASA doesn't hire dummies, we all know that) but its hardly proof, except that he was a clever man and worked for NASA in one of the biggest lies ever told. The people on the ground had no idea.
And yes Bart Sibrel was a dick for approaching Buzz Aldrin (?) in the way he did, but who else can such people get access to and ask them a question or two? The answer is probably classified information and I really couldn't give a rats ass as I've seen enough to know there is something very fishy about it all.
NASA stinks, period. The company NASA that is, not the well-meaning people who work for it, just to be clear.
Feel free to ignore my post and/or let others bury it in a hail of pointless posts with NO EVIDENCE apart from the same old grainy images showing a dot and a slight shadow. We can see rover tracks, but not the rover or the various bits of spacecraft or junk left behind? Suuure!
I was walking on the moon one day, in the studio light of ...May...June..er...well, who cares. Mua...ha...ha!edit on 6/9/11 by masqua because: Off topic/personal attack remarks edited
A camera shutter as a shield against space radiation. Are you kidding me? Your throwing that out as a fact? Second, the shutter has to open right?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Kitilani
To be fair, we have pictures like that from Mars that I am sure will match up exactly when Japan maps that too.
Images like this?
Yes, it's a composite of two pan shots.
edit on 9/7/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Yes. Have you not seen them?
Originally posted by borutp
reply to post by DJW001
Studio lights? Ufo landing? kidding about this one
Originally posted by the4thhorseman
I will post this here and on the other thread Moon thread as well. Just as the this whole hoax moon landing question comes up. We find stories in the news with new hi-res photos of the site.
Source 1Source 2
Funny makes you think who is watching who and who is who on this site..LOL
Originally posted by borutp
reply to post by PsykoOps
Amongst the many different proofs of a nonlanding on the moon this page is one of the best....If you care to look at all that is presented on this page ... guess not because you belive in moon landing
Linkedit on 7-9-2011 by borutp because: (no reason given)
FACT: Rumor has it that...