I think I get where you were trying to go with this OP. And I can appreciate the frustration of wanting to have a discussion that is somewhat an
amalgam of astronomy, scientific theory and eyewitness testimony, only to have to manage responses insisting our intergallactic interlopers are in
fact ye olde daemons of Christianity. I read your post to mean that it's freakishly frustrating to "argue" with anyone insisting that the one
religion they were introduced to and embraced - one religion out of the thousands the planet has seen - has imbued them with the supernatural and
interstellar knowledge necessary to take an informed step in any direction, as the reward for following said religion's deity. Which yes, for me
personally, is arrogant. I mean, who's to say it isn't the Zoroastrians with an original copy of the book signed by the big guy/gal?
However, I'm glad I continued to read the responses. All of the arguments insisting "No, you're arrogant!" aside, there are possibilities to
consider alongside the alien hypothesis, such as hyperdimensional beings. Are they still aliens? Well I kind of think so, considering they would
exist in a dimension my brain may have difficulty perceiving and accurately translating. But you get what I'm saying here.
Had you replaced the word "arrogant" with the word "elementary" as a way to portray their conclusions as those we would all have drawn 600 years
ago, your post may have held the vitriol at bay. Then again, I kind of like replacing "arrogant" with "provincial" but realized it may be more
argumentative.
This whole understanding the universe is the most complicated endeavor uptaken by mankind. Commensurate with its complexity, we may all be required
to turn over every stone to come to an understanding, including texts written thousands of years ago about beings we regarded as gods.
But I didn't read your post as an assassination of all things religious, and perhaps other responders may find some forgiveness for you.