It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What Does Abortion Have To Do With Pro-Choice?
you do not have to put your sticky penis into her body and your sticky fingers into her womb and decide what she has to do with YOUR sperm baby ok ???
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
So if I enter your house when you invite me you can kill me because your choice to murder me is greater than my life?
My HOUSE is not my BODY. If you enter my body (as a fetus is FULLY INSIDE the body), then yes, I would take you out without a second's thought. This is MY body. My person. MY choice.
If men got pregnant, this discussion would NEVER come up. And if it did, I'd defend the men completely. I will never understand how men think that this subject is ANY of their business. People who think they have a right to another person's body (and want the GOVERNMENT to get involved) are a scourge on this country and really make me sick.
When you vote that the government should make decisions about the medical surgeries and practices that YOU choose, then I'll give you some credit. Until then, you're just putting your nose in where it doesn't belong.
As regards the terms "pro-choice" and "pro-abortion"... I am pro-choice. I would not choose an abortion for myself (even in the case of rape or incest), but I understand the concepts of true freedom and choice. I don't just pay it lip service, like some people here.
You're against women having the choice. You're anti-choice. You want the government to dictate control over a woman's body... Good luck with that. But don't expect that calling people 'murderers' and all this other emotional garbage is going to change a thing.
Women will NOT be controlled by control-freak men again. It's too late to try to regain that position over women. This is 2011. Welcome to the present.
reply to post by meeneecat
Excellent!
Originally posted by meeneecat
A) Why are some people so concerned about other people's personal lives.
B) Why are so many so-called "small government" people advocating BIG government policy for abortion (i.e. forced medically unnecessary ultrasounds, mandated government written scripts that doctors must read which & also medically inaccurate, gov't mandated "waiting periods", etc.)
People who spout "Freedom and Rights", while denying rights to the people with which they disagree are hypocrites of the highest order. There are MANY of these on both sides of the political aisle.
Originally posted by AnIntellectualRedneck
A fetus, especially in the first trimester when the vast majority of abortions are performed, are apart of a woman's body whether people like that or not. To be blunt about it: if that fetus is not viable on its own, then it is really little more than a parasite.edit on 5-9-2011 by AnIntellectualRedneck because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wookiep
Originally posted by Sunlionspirit
you do not have to put your sticky penis into her body and your sticky fingers into her womb and decide what she has to do with YOUR sperm baby ok ???
That's great BUT!!!!! It takes two for this to happen, did you not get the instruction BOOKLET?? It clearly states that in order to have sex (sticky penis in her body ) the female ALSO decides this is going to happen, unless it's rape.
Hillarious post tho!edit on 6-9-2011 by Wookiep because: ETA emotes
Originally posted by Kitilani
Originally posted by The Old American
Dunno what was so funny about it, but it won't be a killin, it will be tens of thousands, actually. OMGLOL!!111
A husband finds out that his wife is pregnant by another man. He beats her soundly, and the fetus dies. This was a premeditated act. It's in the first trimester. He is successfully convicted of murder.
A woman finds out she is pregnant and doesn't want to be. She has not been raped, there is no reasonable cause to think there won't be a successful birth of a healthy child. It's in the first trimester. She aborts the fetus. This was a premeditated act. She is held up as a shining example of women being able to do what they want with their bodies.
Human babies are used every day as political tools. And the people that use them that way are also tools.
/TOA
Your thought experiment fails in reality. How about you provide a real case. Names, dates, etc to go along with your point so we can see just how logical it really is in the real world to compare a woman volunteering for a procedure to her being involuntarily assaulted by someone else.
Unless you can put some real world facts behind it, it is worthless. Can you?
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by The Old American
A husband finds out that his wife is pregnant by another man. He beats her soundly, and the fetus dies. This was a premeditated act. It's in the first trimester. He is successfully convicted of murder.
Actually, no. In about half of US states, he would only be convicted of an assault on the woman.
Currently, at least 38 states have fetal homicide laws. The states include: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin. At least 21 states have fetal homicide laws that apply to the earliest stages of pregnancy ("any state of gestation," "conception," "fertilization" or "post-fertilization"); these are indicated below with an asterisk (*).
Fetal Homicide State Laws
38 is more than half.
Originally posted by The Old American
Originally posted by Kitilani
Originally posted by The Old American
Dunno what was so funny about it, but it won't be a killin, it will be tens of thousands, actually. OMGLOL!!111
A husband finds out that his wife is pregnant by another man. He beats her soundly, and the fetus dies. This was a premeditated act. It's in the first trimester. He is successfully convicted of murder.
A woman finds out she is pregnant and doesn't want to be. She has not been raped, there is no reasonable cause to think there won't be a successful birth of a healthy child. It's in the first trimester. She aborts the fetus. This was a premeditated act. She is held up as a shining example of women being able to do what they want with their bodies.
Human babies are used every day as political tools. And the people that use them that way are also tools.
/TOA
Your thought experiment fails in reality. How about you provide a real case. Names, dates, etc to go along with your point so we can see just how logical it really is in the real world to compare a woman volunteering for a procedure to her being involuntarily assaulted by someone else.
Unless you can put some real world facts behind it, it is worthless. Can you?
A real case? How about a few?
First, the feticide laws of all 50 states:
Fetal Homicide Laws
Here's Laci and Connor's Law:
Laci and Connor's Law
Other fantastical and couldn't ever happen in reality situations:
COMMENTARY: Fetal Homicide Laws & Legal Abortion - The Common Denominator
People v. Taylor
It got tiring doing your research for you. Google will help you with the rest of them. But I'll provide you with a couple of names to search for:
Rae Caruth
Corinne Wilcott
Fails in reality? Volunteering for a procedure? A procedure. Removing a wart is a procedure. Having a tooth extracted is a procedure.
So, if a fetus is just a mass of tissue according to pro-choice, "I can do whatever I want with my body" people, not a human, or a person, until "it" has traveled out of the womb and taken "its" first breath, how can it be murder if it's premeditated, but not murder if it's premeditated? Or, wait, it isn't if it's premeditated but...wait...sorry the politics of when it's OK to murder a child and when not OK to murder a child are really confusing!
/TOA
Originally posted by Sunlionspirit
the old american is effectively an old MAN of course, a MAN with a omnipotent penis .....( hahahaha ) .......
a man wanting to decide himself like a dictator what a woman has to do with HER body ...
a man with a stupid penis wanting to penetrate each women's body but NEVER take responsability for the outcome !!!
a macho ( this is NOT personnal !!! ) playing with his instrument but never wanting to hear the noise it is making afterwards .... not listening to the woman's cry, not listening to the woman's despair .....
bullsh**t, you have NO RIGHT AT ALL TO JUDGE A WOMAN OR TO DECIDE IN HER PLACE ABOUT ABORTION !!
the embryo is the fruit in HER body, the sperm of the man not taking his responsability with her ovule, it's NOT a person.
It should be normally the fruit of LOVE but here it is the fruit of evil in cases of abortion !!! ( rape/incest etc !! ).
Originally posted by Wookiep
reply to post by Sunlionspirit
Actually, I disagree again. I'm sorry, I don't have the numbers in front of me but I'll make a LARGE bet that most abortions aren't a result of rape and incest. I think someone earlier said only something like 5% are in that category. I'm also not mixing the discussion, I'm right on topic.
Originally posted by The Old American
Originally posted by Sunlionspirit
the old american is effectively an old MAN of course, a MAN with a omnipotent penis .....( hahahaha ) .......
a man wanting to decide himself like a dictator what a woman has to do with HER body ...
a man with a stupid penis wanting to penetrate each women's body but NEVER take responsability for the outcome !!!
a macho ( this is NOT personnal !!! ) playing with his instrument but never wanting to hear the noise it is making afterwards .... not listening to the woman's cry, not listening to the woman's despair .....
bullsh**t, you have NO RIGHT AT ALL TO JUDGE A WOMAN OR TO DECIDE IN HER PLACE ABOUT ABORTION !!
the embryo is the fruit in HER body, the sperm of the man not taking his responsability with her ovule, it's NOT a person.
It should be normally the fruit of LOVE but here it is the fruit of evil in cases of abortion !!! ( rape/incest etc !! ).
You could benefit from RIF.
My posts were about the double standard that exists. My examples are true, real world examples of people being tried and convicted of murdering a child, yet when the issue is abortion, it suddenly isn't a child anymore, it's a mass of tissue.
One my examples, BTW, was about a woman convicted of murder because of this double standard.
Human children are used as political tools and it sickens me, as it should any rational person.
So, your rambling, pointless diatribe wasn't clear. Maybe you can tell us whether you are for the double standard or against it?
/TOA
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
If you enter my body (as a fetus is FULLY INSIDE the body), then yes, I would take you out without a second's thought. This is MY body. My person. MY choice.
I will never understand how men think that this subject is ANY of their business.
People who think they have a right to another person's body (and want the GOVERNMENT to get involved) are a scourge on this country and really make me sick.
As regards the terms "pro-choice" and "pro-abortion"... I am pro-choice. I would not choose an abortion for myself (even in the case of rape or incest), but I understand the concepts of true freedom and choice. I don't just pay it lip service, like some people here.
You're against women having the choice. You're anti-choice
You want the government to dictate control over a woman's body
Women will NOT be controlled by control-freak men again. It's too late to try to regain that position over women. This is 2011. Welcome to the present.