I no longer support Ron Paul, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 19 times


reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 01:11 PM by Ittabena
reply to post by LDragonFire





I no longer support Ron Paul is he is still a Republican


OMG, really? He is? Well then I don't care how much sense he makes, now that you put forth such a rational argument I will vote for someone who will conduct business as usual, it's got us this far right? And we are all doing so well now huh? Anyone got $5.00 I can borrow for a loaf of bread?

Dear God in heaven give me strength. I think someone needs a nap...


reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 01:12 PM by Swills
reply to post by LDragonFire



Jesus, so you agree Ron Paul is everything we would want in a politician who has a fantastic voting record but you refuse to support him cause he is running as a Republican? Sorry, but that's ignorant. Ron Paul is the poster boy of what a candidate should be and what Americans should want! We all would love Ron to run as an Independent but to play the Pres game you gotta play by the rules. So he may be running as a Republican but he is still an Independent at heart. Vote Ron Paul 2012 or risk the other shills getting into office.

Ron Paul 2012 or bust!


reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 01:13 PM by SpaDe_
reply to post by LDragonFire



In a sea of corrupt, crooked, evil, lying politicians Ron Paul is still the only one that has made clear what his true intentions are. Even if he announced tomorrow that he would run as a Democrat he would still get my vote. You cannot hold his political standing against him in this situation. If he does not get on the ballot in one of the two major parties then I fear his shot at POTUS will be severely hurt. When sheeple show up to vote they are going to check Democrat or Republican plain and simple.


reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 01:41 PM by Northwarden
Originally posted by LDragonFire

The main reason I no longer support Ron Paul is he is still a Republican, and I don't feel that Republicans have the nations or its citizenry best interest at heart.


From Protocol 12, Control of the Press, under the heading "Free Press destroyed", we whistleblowers should always be concerned with this grouping of ideologies - the same infiltration that invaded the tea party. With the protocols being hoaxy, or not, the ideology is not bound to the source, and clearly works into actual working methodology. The danger of a good or bad idea is that it is never committed only to the source, and can be applied as needed, leaving us to guess the veracity of the source, degree of the vector, and wondering as to the scope of a social disease it may be symtomic of.

9. In the front rank will stand organs of an official character. They will always stand guard over our interests, and therefore their influence will be comparatively insignificant.

10. In the second rank will be the semi-official organs, whose part it will be to attack the tepid and indifferent.

11. In the third rank we shall set up our own, to all appearance, opposition, which, in at least one of its organs, will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards.


www.biblebelievers.org.au... No. 12

On the other hand, if |Ron Paul is simply a planted agent of the Republican party, I don't think he could convict us on the truth of so many of his previous stances, as he has done successfully.

Without an actual eye on the rabbit-hole on him, I can't say too much more than general qualifiers. Point is, he acts as a conqueror, ready to take on the systems - speaking against war policy, the federal reserve, etc. If he is successful, he reforms the Republican party in the process, and for the better. Otherwise, they overtake him, ...but ... I don't see him as a man to put down his principles lightly, and hopefully, God willing, not at all. Service for the sake of the people, in the capacity the office opens, not for service to self, or for the benefit of corruption or ongoing, lobbied or commanded agenda.

< This is a copy of the Protocols, on-line, and the site context is actually irrelevant in this instance.
edit on 5-9-2011 by Northwarden because: double // for bolded html fixt



reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 02:05 PM by NightGypsy
reply to post by LDragonFire





I think Ron Paul has integrity, and is a honest man in a crooked game of politics.


Good LORD, your first sentence makes the rest of your post sound ludicrous.

You think he has integrity and is an honest man? When was the last time we had a politician like that, LDragonFire? That alone is a good reason to vote for him, regardless of his party affiliation.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



A Really Sad Picture That I Saw Today, Left Me Speechless
  Posted 12 days ago with 148 member flags
Fact Check: First Lady\'s False Fairy Tale of Struggle
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags
Coal miners say they were forced to attend Romney event and donate
  Posted 14 days ago with 71 member flags
Stephen King\'s Message
  Posted 10 days ago with 71 member flags
Paul Ryan Exposes Elite Agenda, "Shut Up" Says Banker
  Posted 10 days ago with 40 member flags