It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

the perfect murder???

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 22 2004 @ 09:30 PM
link   
This is what it seems Scott Peterson may indeed get away with. The prosecution has done a great job to take away the mans credibility. Showing evedince of a 'lack of concern' for his missing wife and their unborn baby. I was convinced by the telephone recordings of Mr. Peterson and Amber Frey that this man was guilty. However to put someone behind bars you need to have more evidence than just the defendant being a liar.

I then decided to do some research on the net to further my knowlege of the trial and the investigation that was conducted for Laci and Connor. I have found that my original 'guilty' decission may have been a bit too hasty.

www.geocities.com...

When, where, how, and exactly why did Scott kill Laci Peterson, are the questions that the prosecution have faild to answer. And untill they do there is no reason that this man should be convicted of murder. There is no doubt in my mind (or anyones mind) that he is a lieing scum and really didn't seem too concernd about his missing wife and unborn baby. However, that does not make him guilty of his wifes murder.

I know this may sound crazy and i'll be labled a conspirisist (if thats even a word), but here goes. Does anyone believe that Vivian Mitchell may have been murderd for her eye witness account of seeing Laci AFTER Scott claims he went fishing on December 24, 2003. Maybe to silence her so the medesto poliece don't get sued out their asses for negligence (spell?) if Scott is found to be innocent. ( It is fishy, but i doubt it myself)


abcnews.go.com...


Any input, opinions, info will be most expected and appreciated.

thank u,
stump




posted on Aug, 22 2004 @ 09:41 PM
link   
I believe I read somewhere Vivian Mitchell's statement wouldn't be used in court because she was deceased. (I have no clue where to locate that info).



posted on Aug, 22 2004 @ 10:12 PM
link   
Well is that normal? Has this ever happend before? And how come the poliece never followed up on this information to begin with?

If there is evidence to prove that Scott Peterson is innocent than should it not be presented in front of the jury somehow? I mean ABC even followed up on the story so it obviously made some waves in the media.

The more I think about it the more it just seems like a setup.

Thanks for your reply mako.



posted on Aug, 22 2004 @ 10:22 PM
link   
If he killed her and he is acquitted it will be the perfect murder. Even if he's innocent, I'd say what's left his life is going to be pretty lousy.



posted on Aug, 22 2004 @ 10:25 PM
link   
Supposedly though he's getting fan mail and marriage proposals like crazy from women all over the country.

Some people. :shk:



posted on Aug, 22 2004 @ 11:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
If he killed her and he is acquitted it will be the perfect murder. Even if he's innocent, I'd say what's left his life is going to be pretty lousy.


This trial has been so hyped up. First OJ, then this guy, then Kobe & Martha. I am getting pretty sick of media frenzy trials these days.



posted on Aug, 22 2004 @ 11:26 PM
link   
American Justice is an oxymoron. For the prosecution and defense alike it is nothing more than a springboard for a book deal and a court tv gig.



posted on Aug, 23 2004 @ 01:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
If he killed her and he is acquitted it will be the perfect murder. Even if he's innocent, I'd say what's left his life is going to be pretty lousy.


Yes, I agree with you on both points. If he did kill her it will in fact be a perfect murder. He left nothing to be discoverd, therefor leaving nothing for the prosecution to take advantage of. However that would mean that they wouldnt be able to convict him anything, except for the fact that he is a lieing a**hole who dont really care what happens to his wife and unborn child. Which they' ve already proven. If he is convicted under those curcumstances than we can agree, it was a wrongfull conviction.

But if he is found innocent, than why should he be demonized like that for a crime he never commited? All Scott peterson has to choose from is " a rock and a hard place " and its the medias fault for leaving him with only those options.



posted on Aug, 23 2004 @ 01:32 AM
link   


American Justice is an oxymoron. For the prosecution and defense alike it is nothing more than a springboard for a book deal and a court tv gig.





This trial has been so hyped up. First OJ, then this guy, then Kobe & Martha. I am getting pretty sick of media frenzy trials these days.


Both are valid points. Its just shameful how poeple are trying to get rich and famous at other peoples expence.



posted on Aug, 23 2004 @ 08:58 AM
link   
Yes it is a shame, and with new media souces becoming more and more prevalent, I don't think it will ever stop.



posted on Aug, 23 2004 @ 02:25 PM
link   
Does anyone have any news on why Amber Frey's cross examination was postponed? It was all set to take place, then the judge suddely said somthing has come up and gave everyone an early weekend.

What had come up?
Any speculations?



posted on Aug, 23 2004 @ 02:31 PM
link   
I hate Court TV. All it does is convince people that anybody who walks in the courtroom is guilty. I'm tired of how some people automatically say people are guilty only because there on trial. Trial is to determine whos inconcent and guilty. But yes if Scott Peterson did do it he did it good. But if he did it then its not perfect. A perfect murder means you wouldn't even be a suspect much less go on trial.



posted on Aug, 23 2004 @ 02:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by cyberdude78
I A perfect murder means you wouldn't even be a suspect much less go on trial.


Good point, cyberdude.



posted on Aug, 23 2004 @ 02:53 PM
link   
Either way, Scott's life is far from over. He will have book deals, movie deals, etc, etc, etc.

He shows so little caring to be carrying on with Amber Frey days after Laci goes missing, what's to stop him from using her murder to get himself lots of $$$$$.

I feel sorry for Laci's family and Scott's family.

Screw Scott, guilty or not, he's an a--hole.



posted on Aug, 23 2004 @ 02:58 PM
link   
Has anyone heard any updates on the trial or Frey's testimony?

All I could find today was an article stating they were waiting on the the testimony of an AT&T wireless person, from Florida, to come testify.

(Wasn't it stated somewhere Peterson had access to like, 4 cell phones?)

You know, they could've gotten away from all this wiretapping the phones and evidence of phone records by using prepaid cell phones. You can purchase these cell phones, and extra minutes, today even at convience stores.

[edit on 23-8-2004 by mako0956]



posted on Aug, 23 2004 @ 03:03 PM
link   
The american justice system puts a lot of very bad people behind bars everyday and you can't really judge the system by this or the Simpson case.

I think that Peterson will walk because the D.A. screwed up, not because he is innocent.

This should be a crime and maybe the D.A. should be held accountable if he walks.

Double jeopardy is in place to keep innocent people from being charged again and again for the same crime, but I think in some cases it sould be removed.

john



posted on Aug, 23 2004 @ 03:06 PM
link   


A perfect murder means you wouldn't even be a suspect much less go on trial.


A good point.

But of course he is going to be a suspect, the husband of a murderd wife is always a prime suspect or vice versa.The reason I say its a perfect crime is they cant estabish a motive, there is no weapon, no crime scene, no witnesses. If he did infact do it, it may not be perfect but prity darn close.



posted on Aug, 23 2004 @ 03:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by SIRR1
Double jeopardy is in place to keep innocent people from being charged again and again for the same crime, but I think in some cases it sould be removed.


The system has gotten around the double jeopardy protection by allowing a person who is acquitted in criminal court to be sued in civil court where the burden of proof is lower. This happened OJ and countless others.

Few feel sorry for OJ, but many who use a firearm for self protection and who are acquitted of any wrong doing are then dragged into civil court and then have huge monetary damages levied against them.

This situation is a perversion of justice and defies the spirit of the law. Peterson is likely to find himself in civil court unless someone finds the "real killers."



posted on Aug, 23 2004 @ 03:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by mako0956
Has anyone heard any updates on the trial or Frey's testimony?

All I could find today was an article stating they were waiting on the the testimony of an AT&T wireless person, from Florida, to come testify.

(Wasn't it stated somewhere Peterson had access to like, 4 cell phones?)

You know, they could've gotten away from all this wiretapping the phones and evidence of phone records by using prepaid cell phones. You can purchase these cell phones, and extra minutes, today even at convience stores.

[edit on 23-8-2004 by mako0956]


Amber Frey is on the stand right now as I am typing this. Too bad ill be at work when court is let out and we know what has happend. I hope yous have some info on here for me. I dont have any other info on the case as of yet.

Is that why the judge delayd the case? Because they wher waiting on someone in Florida?

As for the prepaid cell phones, they arent realy that popular. They are much more expencive to have than a cel phone with a monthly plan. And the way these 2 love birds liked to chat, the cost of buying minutes for a prepaid phone too expencive. I dont know anything about wire tapping a phone, I really didnt think it matterd what kind of phone you used.



posted on Aug, 23 2004 @ 03:28 PM
link   


I hate Court TV. All it does is convince people that anybody who walks in the courtroom is guilty. I'm tired of how some people automatically say people are guilty only because there on trial. Trial is to determine whos inconcent and guilty. But yes if Scott Peterson did do it he did it good. But if he did it then its not perfect. A perfect murder means you wouldn't even be a suspect much less go on trial


you obviously havent watched it lately. All that they are doing are playing the recorded phone calls. If you listen to them, you will have no doubt of his guilt. First he tells her that he lost his wife and this will be the first xmas without her, even though she hasnt even gone missing yet. Then after she is missing hes tellin her he's in europe and having a great time. He is on the phone with her, while they are hold A CANDLE LIGHT VIGIL FOR HIS MISSING WIFE AND BABY.....this guy is a douche and is going to fry. When Amber starts to grill him about all the BS he has been telling her, he clams up quick. But the whole time before she figures him out, he just talks and talks.

then at one point he called her from a pay phone. He told her "there are things about this I need to tell you but cant" hmmmm what could that be you cold callous uncarring jerk? This dude is guiltier than OJ and is going to be convicted in about 10 minutes...



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join