It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
NASA Announces Media Teleconference on New Apollo Images GREENBELT, Md. -- NASA will host a media teleconference at noon on Tuesday, Sept. 6, to reveal new images of three Apollo landing sites taken from the agency's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, or LRO.
Teleconference participants are:
-- Jim Green, director, Planetary Science Division, NASA Headquarters, Washington
-- Mark Robinson, principal investigator, Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera, Arizona State University, Tempe
-- Richard Vondrak, LRO project scientist, NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
To participate in the teleconference, reporters must email Nancy Jones at [email protected] with their name, media affiliation and work telephone number by 10 a.m. on Sept. 6.
Supporting information and visuals for the briefing will be posted at 11:45 a.m. EDT Sept. 6 at:
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by patternfinder
Originally posted by jheated5
reply to post by iNkGeEk
I suppose you are right, with the level of technology we have now we can replicate the moon landing on a hollywood set itself...
they were photoshopping just fine back then....theres a thread on this site that goes into detail about the techniques they had way back.....
Link to that please? Photoshop development started in 1987
Originally posted by CaDreamer
its like saying that Lindbergh didn't fly the Atlantic because nobody saw him en route only saw him take off and land there is no proof that there was a interim journey. your not using logic
they got there but not with that equitment the saturn rocket would have to be 7+ times bigger
what they found freightened the beejezzuz out of them just listen to the tapes
the moon is hollow proved & rang like a bell for more than 30 minutes
not long ago loads of film were found dumped at a empty macdonalds in the trash bin outside
astronomers for hundreds of years have reported THINGS going on lights & movment on the moon
?But yet,a reporter can confront Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong and not get one answer .Seems like good ole Neil would of put his hand on that bible and good ole Buzz would of answered some questions nicely instead of throwing punches !
Originally posted by wasco2
reply to post by superman2012
The evidence is all in the public domain. If you are not equipped to evaluate the evidence and come to the inescapable conclusion that we did in fact go to the moon that is not my problem. It's yours.
I will, however, give you this as a start:
www.nasa.gov...edit on 5-9-2011 by wasco2 because: add link
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
reply to post by superman2012
I take it then you have no evidence of a rover ?
No I don't, just as you don't that man was there.
Originally posted by liejunkie01
reply to post by superman2012
No I don't, just as you don't that man was there.
Can I ask exactly what evidence you are looking for?
I see evidence all over the place. Why don't you?
Originally posted by ViP3r
reply to post by ViP3r
What Neil should of done was : put his left hand on the bible and said "Hi, I'm Neil Armstrong and i DID land on the moon " ...BUT instead his little buddy was tryng to get the guy to leave...here's the link again for those that have not seen it !
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by superman2012
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
reply to post by superman2012
I take it then you have no evidence of a rover ?
No I don't, just as you don't that man was there.
Originally posted by superman2012
Originally posted by liejunkie01
reply to post by superman2012
No I don't, just as you don't that man was there.
Can I ask exactly what evidence you are looking for?
I see evidence all over the place. Why don't you?
I like to question things they try to spoon feed me. You don't. It isn't a fault, we are just different. If something seems fishy to me, I want to try to understand it, that is why I am asking for solid, credible proof, because I don't have any for either side.
Ok, religious nut/reporter or not , seems like if i was Neil or Buzz i would answer whomever it was and not avoid. Obviously they have something to hide .