Please Debunk The Moon Landing Hoax For Me..., page 3

privacy

Pages: << 1 2 3 4 5 6 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 15 times

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:00 AM by benbarol

did u ever try to visit NASA official site?? they put a high resolutin picture in there...

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:01 AM by CaDreamer

reply to post by Phage

i dont know why i try to convince these folks of the obvious...Phage has spoken...it is done.

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:01 AM by patternfinder

Originally posted by CaDreamer

Originally posted by patternfinder

Originally posted by jheated5
reply to post by CaDreamer

Where's this evidence you are talking about?

i know for me, the only proof i need to know that we didn't really do it was the not a spec of dust on the landing feet and absolutely no evidence of the dust being stirred up under the rocket...there would be a huge crater under there, there is nothing....proof enough for me......

so now your a astrophysicist and an expert at molecular dynamics in a vacuum in low gravity.

ha ha, if you look at the pics you can clearly see dust on the astronots boots, and their weight made footprints but 5000 psi of rocket 3 feet from the ground won't stir up the dust and dig a hole?

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:03 AM by Phage

reply to post by GrassyKnoll

What ultralow temperature? There isn't really any "temperature" on the Moon unless you measure the temperature of an object like a rock. The Apollo missions occurred early in the lunar "day". There was enough sunlight to warm things up.

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:03 AM by theXammux

What i am saying is, if you want something that YOU (rather than 98% of the rest of the world) would call credible, then tell me what you might consider as credible evidence. If you consider nothing credible then the entire thrread is moot.

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:05 AM by liejunkie01

reply to post by CaDreamer

I have been reading the info and looking at hundreds of photos.

Here is Apollo 11 image library.
next.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/images11.html#Mag44

I did notice some were not available.

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:06 AM by GrassyKnoll

Originally posted by CaDreamer
and where do you suppose they went until they came back on reentry? you agree they took off and landed.

I don't dispute the Apollo missions taking off and landing back on earth. But while we are on this topic: Where is the on-craft video footage of Apollo orbiting the moon then making entry onto the moons surface? There is no proof Apollo spacecraft landed on the moon. Their landing would have left huge imprints on the moon's surface. Where are satellite photos of them? Curious as to how google moon stops just short of the zoom level required to show these very large imprints?

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:06 AM by GrassyKnoll

Originally posted by benbarol
did u ever try to visit NASA official site?? they put a high resolutin picture in there...

post it on this thread please

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:06 AM by Insomniac

reply to post by GrassyKnoll

If no one went to the Moon how did 843 lbs of moon rock get here? Please don't say that it's not moon rock because then you'd have to explain how it's older than any rock found on Earth!

Anyway this link should answer your question for you...

Moon Landings wiki

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:08 AM by CaDreamer

Originally posted by patternfinder

Originally posted by CaDreamer

Originally posted by patternfinder

Originally posted by jheated5
reply to post by CaDreamer

Where's this evidence you are talking about?

i know for me, the only proof i need to know that we didn't really do it was the not a spec of dust on the landing feet and absolutely no evidence of the dust being stirred up under the rocket...there would be a huge crater under there, there is nothing....proof enough for me......

so now your a astrophysicist and an expert at molecular dynamics in a vacuum in low gravity.

ha ha, if you look at the pics you can clearly see dust on the astronauts boots, and their weight made footprints but 5000 psi of rocket 3 feet from the ground won't stir up the dust and dig a hole?

that would require atmosphere, air and an unfrozen planet. the boots remained soiled i imagine because they where INSIDE the capsule on the journey home.
and the thrust jets where designed to shut off before the lander actually landed . they had 3 foot legs on the feet of the lunar lander that once touching the surface killed the descent engines and a soft low G landing. no crater.

edit on 5-9-2011 by CaDreamer because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:08 AM by superman2012

Originally posted by theXammux
What i am saying is, if you want something that YOU (rather than 98% of the rest of the world) would call credible, then tell me what you might consider as credible evidence. If you consider nothing credible then the entire thrread is moot.

Actually, 20% of americans believe it was hoaxed. Approx. 61 million people. If they were to offer credible solid proof, then this entire thread would indeed be moot.

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:09 AM by Phage

reply to post by GrassyKnoll

Their landing would have left huge imprints on the moon's surface.

Why?
www.clavius.org...

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:09 AM by Connman

Not only would you need a better camera it seems a Maid and a Duster could be a good idea as well. It may just look like a part of the moon by now so the best camera wouldn`t help you there. Seems Moon dust is a real pain.

www.space.com...

"First and foremost is just the fact that the dust just sticks to everything," said Jasper Halekas, a research physicist at University of California, Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory in Berkeley, California.

From gauge dials, helmet sun shades to spacesuits and tools, the "stick-to-itness" of dust during the Apollo missions proved to be a noteworthy problem, Halekas reported. Most amusingly, he added, even the vacuum cleaner that was designed to clean off the dust clogged down and jammed.

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:11 AM by GrassyKnoll

Originally posted by theXammux
What i am saying is, if you want something that YOU (rather than 98% of the rest of the world) would call credible, then tell me what you might consider as credible evidence. If you consider nothing credible then the entire thrread is moot.

High resolution satellite photos of NASA Apollo artifacts lying on the moons surface.

98% of the world could easily be categorized as sheeple.

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:13 AM by superman2012

Originally posted by Insomniac
reply to post by GrassyKnoll

If no one went to the Moon how did 843 lbs of moon rock get here? Please don't say that it's not moon rock because then you'd have to explain how it's older than any rock found on Earth!

Anyway this link should answer your question for you...

Moon Landings wiki

This part of it can be explained by governmental compartmentalization.

Other have been explained away in this thread.

Just credible solid proof. That's all.

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:13 AM by CaDreamer

en.wikipedia.org...

Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:14 AM by GrassyKnoll

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by GrassyKnoll

Their landing would have left huge imprints on the moon's surface.

Why?
www.clavius.org...

I said imprint not crater. The Apollo lander obviously would make an imprint if it were to have ever touched the moon's surface.

reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 12:14 AM by jheated5

Originally posted by Insomniac
reply to post by GrassyKnoll

If no one went to the Moon how did 843 lbs of moon rock get here? Please don't say that it's not moon rock because then you'd have to explain how it's older than any rock found on Earth!

Anyway this link should answer your question for you...

Moon Landings wiki