It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JoshNorton
Well, we've observed other spiral galaxies than our own, so we've got a basis for conjecture to begin with. Likewise, through observation and calculation we can determine motion of our own galaxy and see that it fits the model of others outside our own.
Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli
Originally posted by GrassyKnoll
Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli
Originally posted by GrassyKnoll
A stride is about 3ft on earth. The moon has 1/6th the gravity of the earth so the strides should be a lot bigger.
Do your legs get longer as gravity decreases?
How silly.
For the astronauts to take 3 ft strides on the moon they would have to have exerted 1/6th their normal leg thrust which I'm sure NASA will claim they did.
Okay, I'll bite. Say you're on the moon. How big is your stride?
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Yeah cause all of use go to the beach wearing moon boots, in 1/6th of gravity while wearing tons of gear. That's a valid comparison
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Anyway OP.......what kind of proof would help you? You know, any kinda proof they'd offer up would be shred apart by debunkers anyway. They'd claim Photoshop the whole way.
Originally posted by GrassyKnoll
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Anyway OP.......what kind of proof would help you? You know, any kinda proof they'd offer up would be shred apart by debunkers anyway. They'd claim Photoshop the whole way.
Well I was hoping for surveillance drones to fly over the alleged Apollo sites one day but with NASA calling for a no-fly zone over them I feel the moon landing debate will continue for decades if not longer.
is nasa calling a no fly zone over the moon for real?
Later this month, the agency plans to issue what it calls "recommendations" for spacecraft, or future astronauts, visiting U.S. government property on the moon.
Originally posted by patternfinder
is nasa calling a no fly zone over the moon for real?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by patternfinder
is nasa calling a no fly zone over the moon for real?
No, it is not.
There are recommendations about approaching sites on the surface.
Later this month, the agency plans to issue what it calls "recommendations" for spacecraft, or future astronauts, visiting U.S. government property on the moon.
www.sciencemag.org...
The recommendations have not been announced.edit on 9/8/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)
This is not directed at you Phage but.........recommendations? They can't even control the immigration influx problem here on Earth how dare they start destroying another planet (albeit, moon) with rules/regulations/laws before they even finish destroying their own rock?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Human_Alien
The recommendations concern US property, the stuff left on the Moon. The intent is to preserve sites of great historical value.
Whether or not that stuff should have been left there... sorry, I just don't have a problem with it.
edit on 9/8/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheSandMansExecutioner
Yes, I have always had my suspicions on the spiral Galaxy theory.
Not to say it is Not a Spiral Galaxy...But to know that, would as you say, have to be determined from outside.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by Valar God
Can you prove any of that against the mountain of data that says otherwise? Even a little?
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by Valar God
I don't even know where to start with this one. Rockets work perfectly well in space; I don't know where you got the idea that they didn't. As for your concerns about fuel and weight, at launch the Saturn V has a mass of 3,039,000 kg ( that's 6,699,000 pounds). When it returned to Earth, the Command Module had a mass of 5,560 kg (12,250 pounds). All of that fuel was necessary to send less than ten percent of it to the Moon and return less than one percent of it back to the Earth.
Originally posted by camaro68ss
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Human_Alien
The recommendations concern US property, the stuff left on the Moon. The intent is to preserve sites of great historical value.
Whether or not that stuff should have been left there... sorry, I just don't have a problem with it.
edit on 9/8/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)
I would have to agree. I would love to see 100 years from now these sites turn to parks where future mankind can visit the first landings on the moon.edit on 8-9-2011 by camaro68ss because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GrassyKnoll
It would definitely be bigger than my earth stride of 3 ft. I would enjoy the feeling and experience of 1/6 th earth's gravity so I would try to jump 15 ft in the air and 30 ft across the horizon.
And a 120 lb spacesuit on the moon would only feel like a 20 lb spacesuit on earth.