9/11, 10 years on and Dr. Judy Wood, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 18-1-2012 @ 04:36 PM by psikeyhackr
Originally posted by samkent
reply to
post by psikeyhackr



Could the design of the core support itself for 110 stories without the lateral support of the floors and exterior?
My internal gut says no because it's too small compared to its height. But if an expert comes here and says otherwise I'll accept it.


fortunately physics does not work on your gut.

It was the core that gave the building its rigidity against the wind. It supported 53% of the weight. It would be more stable without the rest. But it would serve no purpose since it provided the means to get to all of those floors.

I already provided a python program indicating the building came down too fast. It takes 12 secons with constant mass and no supports to be destroyed. But Dr. Sunder of the NIST said the north tower came down in 11 seconds. Some sources estimate less than 9 based on the seismograph.

breakfornews.com...

This "gut" bull# keeps this dragging on.

psik
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 12 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 8 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 16 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 18 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 8 days ago with 8 member flags