Originally posted by grizzle2
reply to post by bluemirage5
Well, the melted engine blocks (while the vehicles were distant from any fires), while the other half of the vehicles were largely unharmed, is a
problem. The only choice is to dismiss it out of hand, or not. Certainly there was something in addition to fires, bombs, and any conventional weapon
However, as nobody in the public really understands these phenomena, all that can be said is that something beyond our knowledge was used. That people
say she has been "debunked" or that no one pays any attention to her theories doesn't answer the issue. Hutchison's experiments seem to be a good
possibility as to what might have been used, in my opinion.
Dr. Judy Wood - Cars
I agree that the melted/missing engine blocks are a problem. Unless someone in here has some theory (wait for it) of a bunch of random people driving
engineless cars into work that day and randomly parking them on the street.
Were engines melted and missing? I think they were. I mean, were they? Well then, seems like someone's got some explaining to do...
I seen only one car fire in my life that was put out quickly so I don't know, let me take a poll, who knows what happens to a car engine in a car
fire ignited by say random falling debris? Anyone? Does the engine go missing? Do I have to go out in the parking lot right now and torch a few to see
what happens? Lol Really I did not know that when cars go on fire the engines melt and disappear completely.
Maybe the Pentagon engines were on fire too then? Or the ones in Shanksville?
Seriously, in all my life I did not know that during and after a car fire the engines melt and or tend to disappear. But of course they do and see,
this is the problem. Just because engines melt and disappear due to some fire people will say: "The engines melted and disappeared due to the
fire..." Right? But engines could be melted and 'not there' for a reason other than fire, other than what you might think is 'obvious'. People
who don't believe the Official Story think that a "Controlled Demolition" is 'obvious'... but there may be other ways to take a largely steel
building down that aren't this and only look like fire and CD.
Were the cars torched there near the bridge or moved there later? So they moved the steel to China and the body bits to Fresh Kills but just parked
those other cars over there a bit where they weren't taking up any room in that ruined half empty parking lot. Um Ok.
As for the steel, it's true, there is the story of them trucking it all out and selling it to China. Maybe. But how much was trucked out exactly? Who
even knows? Was it sold to anyone really? How much steel was even there, left to be removed? On another thread I was saying that Lucky Larry may have
said "Pull it" on purpose, to slyly indicate a false "Controlled Demolition" direction.
It's possible that this "All the steel was sold to China" is just something someone said to make you think ALL the steel was there (that should've
been there) and then was removed...
"They sold all the steel to China." Really? All of it? So that's why none of it is around to examine! All OF IT was SOLD.
Seems like the steel wasn't the only thing about 9/11 that was sold.