It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New Video of Flight 93 Crash Site Surfaces! || 9/4/11

page: 1
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:37 PM
link   
Okay so if you're not watching the news right now, then you probably didn't hear about this video surfacing just 10 years after. The filmer of the video is now deceased, so claims the news channel, so here's the article and video included in the article. I'm not a huge 9/11 conspiracy buff like some of you, although I do believe the story isn't what Bush and the Government says it is.

So don't shoot the messenger, I am just here to shed some possible new light onto this subject of matter.
Flight 93 Crash Site Video Surfaces




posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:44 PM
link   
I wouldn't say that this was the crash site. It was video of the smoke from the crash from about 10 miles away, along with a description by the filmer of the way the explosion shook his house.

It's an interesting video, nonetheless.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:44 PM
link   
Because it is shot so far away, this video cannot distinguish between the official scenario, in which Flight 93 crashed into the ground and the alternative scenario, supported by some evidence, that it was blown up by a missile fired from a US military jet. As such, it resolves nothing concerning what really happened that day.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:47 PM
link   
Nice post.

Can anything be determined from the smoke that would indicate it was shot down.

I understand that a theory is that it was shot down.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:47 PM
link   
Thanks for posting, just wish one of the pentagon would be released so we could see what really hit it that day.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Skate
 


Can't see anything but smoke. "They" will have no problem with this getting releases. No evidence either way.

Thanks for the find though OP.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 06:01 PM
link   
All I heard from the guy in the vid is saying something like a bomb went off in the plane?



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 06:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Skate
All I heard from the guy in the vid is saying something like a bomb went off in the plane?


It was something like that, that on his "scanner," he had heard that a bomb may have been on the plane.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 06:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Varemia

Originally posted by Skate
All I heard from the guy in the vid is saying something like a bomb went off in the plane?


It was something like that, that on his "scanner," he had heard that a bomb may have been on the plane.


scanner/radio, whatever it was, maybe it was a bomb and it did go off. If the plane was shot down, how so??

Anyways, I don't care about stars in this thread, but more so of Flags because everybody on ATS should be reading this thread, considering 9/11 is a pretty big part of this website.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 06:27 PM
link   
reply to post by Skate
 


10 years almost to the day and this non-piece comes out.
It doesn't prove anything and could be all just made up.
How would we know? The video quality looks terrible and
wouldn't be the best to capture those immaculate vistas
that the wife kept the camera charged for, ready to capture
at a minutes notice to show them to the city side of
the family who didn't get to see much beauty living in
their urban jungle.
Has the camera operator ever heard of the zoom button?
You'd think he would be tempted to attempt to capture a
close-up of the wreckage, in such a monumental moment.
I know I would.
I am thinking poor quality BS CGI. (just like so many other 9/11 clips)



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 06:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by pshea38
reply to post by Skate
 


10 years almost to the day and this non-piece comes out.
It doesn't prove anything and could be all just made up.
How would we know? The video quality looks terrible and
wouldn't be the best to capture those immaculate vistas
that the wife kept the camera charged for, ready to capture
at a minutes notice to show them to the city side of
the family who didn't get to see much beauty living in
their urban jungle.
Has the camera operator ever heard of the zoom button?
You'd think he would be tempted to attempt to capture a
close-up of the wreckage, in such a monumental moment.
I know I would.
I am thinking poor quality BS CGI. (just like so many other 9/11 clips)


I'm pretty sure CGI doesn't show up on CNN....which is where this video clip was sent to first.

Try again?



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 06:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by pshea38
reply to post by Skate
 


10 years almost to the day and this non-piece comes out.
It doesn't prove anything and could be all just made up.
How would we know? The video quality looks terrible and
wouldn't be the best to capture those immaculate vistas
that the wife kept the camera charged for, ready to capture
at a minutes notice to show them to the city side of
the family who didn't get to see much beauty living in
their urban jungle.
Has the camera operator ever heard of the zoom button?
You'd think he would be tempted to attempt to capture a
close-up of the wreckage, in such a monumental moment.
I know I would.
I am thinking poor quality BS CGI. (just like so many other 9/11 clips)


Um, what?

This is some guy living out in the country. You are making a lot of assumptions about his life on the spot just to conclude by saying you think a video of a plume of smoke is fake.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 06:45 PM
link   
9/11 MADNESS
post removed because of personal attacks

Click here to learn more about this warning.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 07:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Varemia

Originally posted by pshea38
reply to post by Skate
 


10 years almost to the day and this non-piece comes out.
It doesn't prove anything and could be all just made up.
How would we know? The video quality looks terrible and
wouldn't be the best to capture those immaculate vistas
that the wife kept the camera charged for, ready to capture
at a minutes notice to show them to the city side of
the family who didn't get to see much beauty living in
their urban jungle.
Has the camera operator ever heard of the zoom button?
You'd think he would be tempted to attempt to capture a
close-up of the wreckage, in such a monumental moment.
I know I would.
I am thinking poor quality BS CGI. (just like so many other 9/11 clips)


Um, what?

This is some guy living out in the country. You are making a lot of assumptions about his life on the spot just to conclude by saying you think a video of a plume of smoke is fake.


I never said that I thought that plume of smoke is fake...

You're not making any sense?



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 09:54 PM
link   
Nothing to see here.

Really, there's nothing to see. Other than the commentary of some nameless man behind a camera who is dead and whose family wishes to remain anonymous, who knows what he saw exactly since all we see is smoke.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 10:08 PM
link   
reply to post by Skate
 


I posted that in response to pshea, which was the person I quoted. Sorry if I somehow miscommunicated that.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 10:16 PM
link   
It seems a little bizarre how he knows it's a plane. I don't know it ,to me, it has payed disinformation agent all over it....

but what do I know....



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 10:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by zbeliever
It seems a little bizarre how he knows it's a plane. I don't know it ,to me, it has payed disinformation agent all over it....

but what do I know....


He was listening to a scanner. The people said something about a plane and a bomb going down, so naturally he equated that to the smoke, which is typical smoke from an explosion.



posted on Sep, 5 2011 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
Nothing to see here.

Really, there's nothing to see. Other than the commentary of some nameless man behind a camera who is dead and whose family wishes to remain anonymous, who knows what he saw exactly since all we see is smoke.


This is hilarious... first "SKATE" cries that it is computer graphics, and now "rapinbats.." is calling the man nameless and that they wish to remain anonymous. Try reading the story.


The voice of Berlin resident Dave Berkebile, now deceased, can be heard speaking calmly in the background.


Even his sister wrote a comment on the page:


Diane Deist wrote:

Hello, I am Dave Berkebile's sister. Our two homes are the only ones on Bluebird Lane. I saw it was listed as Blue Bird Road in my morning paper. Yes, that was an exciting morning, When my home shook from the impact, I immediately called Dave and asked him if his house shook, He said yes, 'What was that?' I said it must have been an earthquake! Then he saw the smoke to the NW and said'Look out your big window!' I turned on my scanner and heard a large plane went down in Lambertsville, when he heard this he said'I'm going to see.' I left right after for the Shanksville School where I had two grandchildren enrolled. When Dave returned, he said all he saw was a big hole in the ground. Thank you .
September 4, 2011,


tribune-democrat.com...

In all honesty, the only thing this proves is that Val McClatchy's "serenity lost" photo is legit. Sorry Killtown...you lost again.



posted on Sep, 5 2011 @ 08:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by zbeliever

but what do I know....


Good point.




top topics



 
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join