It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Imhotepsol
reply to post by sonnny1
Again that's all conjecture without any fact.
They are not taking my kids away because I am a member here. It is wrong for you to suggest that its a comparable situation.
It is not a matter of not being able to keep weight off kids, it's a matter of obesity. I know that the majority of America is already there but that doesn't normalise it sorry.
Here is the difference between obese and fat. Link if you still think it's okay for children to be left with parents who'd subject them to that then I wouldn't be arguing with anyone who wants to take your kids away.
I mean, is everyone okay with this because its based on food? What if the kid was drinking to alcoholism, taking drugs until they develop crippling addiction? Would that be okay? And further more, if these children are allowed to get this far and never have to develop restraint in appetite or anything else for that matter what kind of people do you think they will grow to be? Useful productive members of a society, or a fat lay-about that have to have walls cut down so they can be removed to be taken to hospital.
Originally posted by Imhotepsol
reply to post by ZIPMATT
Environment? For god sakes, where are the obese people in famine ridden countries? I mean if its a disease or genetic there should be some, but there's not.
Being fat and going beyond fat into obese is a choice. You have to choose to stuff that 5000gs of cream down your throat, you have to have stretched your stomach to accommodate enough food to feed 5 normal people. Obesity and fatness are symptoms of laziness or depression. I don't give a flying **** if you cannot deal with your hunger pangs, if you haven't the self control to stop because of some underlying psychological trauma, it still boils down to a decision that you have to make.
Are you going to eat yourself to death or are you going to eat a moderate amount and be healthy. That's really all there is to it.
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by Imhotepsol
reply to post by sonnny1
Again that's all conjecture without any fact.
They are not taking my kids away because I am a member here. It is wrong for you to suggest that its a comparable situation.
It is not a matter of not being able to keep weight off kids, it's a matter of obesity. I know that the majority of America is already there but that doesn't normalise it sorry.
Here is the difference between obese and fat. Link if you still think it's okay for children to be left with parents who'd subject them to that then I wouldn't be arguing with anyone who wants to take your kids away.
I mean, is everyone okay with this because its based on food? What if the kid was drinking to alcoholism, taking drugs until they develop crippling addiction? Would that be okay? And further more, if these children are allowed to get this far and never have to develop restraint in appetite or anything else for that matter what kind of people do you think they will grow to be? Useful productive members of a society, or a fat lay-about that have to have walls cut down so they can be removed to be taken to hospital.
Why do you need SOMEONE to tell you what to do? Why does ANYONE need to feel they have the right,to break up a family? Conjecture? How bout FACT. In the 30's there was this little thing called Eugenics. You werent good enough to live if you wernt blond hair,blue eyed,and of pure Aryan blood. See,a dictator and his Government 'DECIDED" that some people wernt good enough to live. Far end of the spectrum,but not surprisingly draconian,and forced upon the populous. Guess what? There were those that BELIEVED in it. There are still those who do. Fat,Obese, its not the GOVERNMENT who should say what is right,and by far, shouldn't get involved in the freedom to live free and happy. Im just glad I still have a voice to make my opinion,because there are people who "think" like you,that I shouldnt have that right,or I should be monitored. Good luck with your delusion of right and wrong.When your rights for something you believe in,get trampled,dont complain. Just remember how your opinion on this was.
- Philippe Boucher. You're attempting to slander the legitimate by using a loaded emotional example. Again not a particularly encouraging sign of intelligence.
Most striking, perhaps, is that Nazi scientists pioneered the world's most sophisticated tobacco health research, including the first case control epidemiological studies, concluding unequivocally (p < 1in 10 million) that tobacco was the major cause of lung cancer.
Originally posted by wigit
What about the psychological damage to the kids, surely that's worse than being called tubby at school? This family has done nothing wrong, other than they are all overweight. What about fat social workers and their fat kids?edit on 4-9-2011 by wigit because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by technologicalsingularity
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
yep,disgusting,
thats for those that fall under the "depopulation program + make profit" along the way at the same time, lets not forget the profit the pharma's will make on obesity control and hospitals/health insurers/extra nursing and doctor jobs/new manufacturing/weight loss clinics and local weight loss programs from obesity related disease too, it's all about money and YOUR falling for it, have a look in your supermarket, do you see healthy foods on promotion, i dont! A strange personal observation, why are all "so called" poor people obese? yet even on my wage i(let alone my family) couldnt afford the food bill to make me fat even if i wanted to be, i dont get it!
edit on 4-9-2011 by technologicalsingularity because: ?
Originally posted by technologicalsingularity
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
gov's mask over things quite successfully i.e:- they will tell you deep frying in fat is an unhealthy cooking method for food, but the reality is it's not the deep frying that unhealthy, it's the cooking temperture being above 120C, also many so-called plugged healthy foods that largely include fruits are infact dense in carsongenics, but will tell you contain "anti-oxidants". this is just a very small example, research, research, research.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
You dont' own your children, and neither does the State. Parents are the natural guardians of their children, not the State.
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
You dont' own your children, and neither does the State. Parents are the natural guardians of their children, not the State.
''State'' and ''society'' are not synonymous.
Parents are the guardians of their children due to convenience. Adoption and fostering shows strong evidence that there is absolutely no necessity for a child to be raised by his or her biological parent(s).
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by Imhotepsol
Originally posted by TRiPWiRE
reply to post by hadriana
I don't enjoy fast food advertising being blasted at me every 5 minutes and then walking past one to see it filled to capacity with people clutching handfuls of burgers and chips (sorry, "fries!").
for saying what we were all thinking. That's the exact image I get when I see those people in fast food chains. Literally shovelling handfuls of chips and bits of burger into their mouths at the same time. Ugh, it's disgusting.
It sure beat the horrid school lunches we had when I was in public schools. We would walk to the nearest Burger King and we loved it.
Originally posted by Imhotepsol
Individual freedom is an illusion unless you live as a hermit in a forest or cave. We live in societies where we affect one another. If you want to live in society that's the implied condition. Accept it or move out.