Oh Sarah, you tease!

page: 6
5
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 12:57 PM
link   
reply to post by fooks
 


Not above my head.. I can understand actions and intentions and what we should be doing and how are pretty obvious to me. You just sidestepped my questions and took a shot at veiled condescension.

Both cases were noticed.
edit on 4-9-2011 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)




posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 02:57 PM
link   
Since I'm a tried and true Democrat, I will not support any sort of the maniacal extreme right wing radical philosphy's that spew out of the mouth's of these Republican presidential candidates; Sara Palin included.

But gee whiz, I think Sara Palin will give it a shot to run for president, once Perry's "blunt views in books get new scrutiny; with some assertions are likely to be fodder for a coming Republican debate."

Perry's right wing radical views in his books, are a testimony that will cause him to sink in the poles, giving Sara Palin a somewhat albeit small chance for her to be the main presidential canditate.
edit on 4-9-2011 by Erno86 because: spelling
edit on 4-9-2011 by Erno86 because: ditto



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 03:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Hillary interned for a Marxist. she is more of Obama. She proposed socialised healthcare before Obama did. It's just what's on the socialist plate. Whoever is Democrat will do whatever is on the agenda of the Socialist Party. They have truly captured the Democrat Party.




Both Hillary and Obama's healthcare plans were old Republican healthcare plans.
Hate really gets in the way of facts doesnt it?
How do you like paying thousands for a pill at the hospital because joe motorbike refused to buy insurance before he got himself in an accident? I hate paying for other people's choices.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 04:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by Erno86
Since I'm a tried and true Democrat, I will not support any sort of the maniacal extreme right wing radical philosphy's that spew out of the mouth's of these Republican presidential candidates; Sara Palin included.

But gee whiz, I think Sara Palin will give it a shot to run for president, once Perry's "blunt views in books get new scrutiny; with some assertions are likely to be fodder for a coming Republican debate."

Perry's right wing radical views in his books, are a testimony that will cause him to sink in the poles, giving Sara Palin a somewhat albeit small chance for her to be the main presidential canditate.
edit on 4-9-2011 by Erno86 because: spelling
edit on 4-9-2011 by Erno86 because: ditto



Alright since you are now throwing around descriptive terms like "radical" and "maniacal", why don't you get real specific and tell us which specific things you find radical and maniacal? HMMM?



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 04:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kitilani

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Hillary interned for a Marxist. she is more of Obama. She proposed socialised healthcare before Obama did. It's just what's on the socialist plate. Whoever is Democrat will do whatever is on the agenda of the Socialist Party. They have truly captured the Democrat Party.




Both Hillary and Obama's healthcare plans were old Republican healthcare plans.
Hate really gets in the way of facts doesnt it?
How do you like paying thousands for a pill at the hospital because joe motorbike refused to buy insurance before he got himself in an accident? I hate paying for other people's choices.


Are you referring to Romneycare? Ask me what I think about that and why I won't vote for Romney unless he's the only one opposing the radical Marxist-in-Chief?


Other than RomneyCare would you care to tell me what part of Obamacare's thousands of pages of mandated health insurance coverage plan and rationed health care were Republican? Please back up your assertions with some material instead of just making blanket statements. Did you know that Hillary tried to pass the healthcare thing when Billy was still POTUS?
edit on 4-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 04:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Kitilani
 


"THousands for a pill" is an extreme exaggeration used for drama.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 04:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kitilani

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Hillary interned for a Marxist. she is more of Obama. She proposed socialised healthcare before Obama did. It's just what's on the socialist plate. Whoever is Democrat will do whatever is on the agenda of the Socialist Party. They have truly captured the Democrat Party.




Both Hillary and Obama's healthcare plans were old Republican healthcare plans.
Hate really gets in the way of facts doesnt it?
How do you like paying thousands for a pill at the hospital because joe motorbike refused to buy insurance before he got himself in an accident? I hate paying for other people's choices.


I also hate paying for other people's stuff. So then why would you want a healthcare system that promotes taxpayer funds going to pay for illegals healthcare?

rightwingnews.com...
edit on 4-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
edit on 4-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Erno86
 


So what is it buddy? Global warming? It's a fact that CO2 is part of our natural ecology. The liberals got their butts collectively kicked on that one when grade school science came in the picture. Not to mention that the sun is mostly responsible for warming and cooling trends. The libs even had to change their theory to Climate Change to accomodate the natural changes. Now they say there will just be wild fluctations.

Ok what else besided global warming? A return to Constitutionalism? Most Tea Party candidates talk about that a lot. What else? A balanced budget, less govt spending?
Wow we are really talking some radical stuff here.

I noticed that some of the attacks on Michelle Bachmann are related to Terri Schiavo. That's just more evidence that liberals believe in healthcare rationing and control by the State where judges interfere in family decisions. That was interestingly a precedent set just when the healthcare debate came on full fury.
I happen to be pro life and felt that starving Terri Schiavo to death was one of the most inhumane disasters for legislation I've seen.

Face it. Besides the economical differences (socialism vs free market) there are fundamental differences in social differences between liberals and conservatives.

edit on 4-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
edit on 4-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Kitilani
 


"THousands for a pill" is an extreme exaggeration used for drama.


Nice to know that no one you know has ever had cancer then. How lucky for you.
Better check your "facts" again.
edit on 4-9-2011 by Kitilani because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus

Originally posted by Kitilani

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Hillary interned for a Marxist. she is more of Obama. She proposed socialised healthcare before Obama did. It's just what's on the socialist plate. Whoever is Democrat will do whatever is on the agenda of the Socialist Party. They have truly captured the Democrat Party.




Both Hillary and Obama's healthcare plans were old Republican healthcare plans.
Hate really gets in the way of facts doesnt it?
How do you like paying thousands for a pill at the hospital because joe motorbike refused to buy insurance before he got himself in an accident? I hate paying for other people's choices.


I also hate paying for other people's stuff. So then why would you want a healthcare system that promotes taxpayer funds going to pay for illegals healthcare?

rightwingnews.com...
edit on 4-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
edit on 4-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)


First you are going to have to tell me when I did.
We do that now, you know. We just pay MORE for it now than we need to.
Nice that you back up talking points with talking points and all but I can tell by the title of your link what I can expect to find there. I am not sure why you responded since nothing you have said makes any sense.
edit on 4-9-2011 by Kitilani because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:15 PM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


It's an exaggeration.. but not much of one.

Expensive prescriptions:
Lipitor a drug many americans take for high cholesterol costs people 1,500 a year.
Zyprexa for schizophrenia (not an uncommon disorder, I've known three people with it) costs 7,000 a year.
Avastin for cancer costs 50,000 dollars a year.

Really.. read this and learn why we need a "socialized" health care.
nakedhealth.avvo.com...


Here’s some context. Prior to FDA approval, Makena was around as a a relatively inexpensive drug known as 17p, a progesterone shot that pharmacists have been compounding themselves for several years. After receiving exclusive rights to produce it, the company manufacturing Makena, KV Pharmaceuticals, set the cost per dose at $1,500, even though pharmacies had been charging between $10 and $20 for the same formulation. After taking some heat in the press and from members of Congress, KV Pharmaceuticals announced they would cut the cost in half per dose to $690. However, this still raised the cost over the course of a pregnancy from $400 to nearly $14,00 –an increase of 3,400%.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kitilani

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Kitilani
 


"THousands for a pill" is an extreme exaggeration used for drama.


Nice to know that no one you know has ever had cancer then. How lucky for you.
Better check your "facts" again.
edit on 4-9-2011 by Kitilani because: (no reason given)


Yes, in fact both my parents had cancer. If you are talking about chemotherapy treatments, your quote is still way out of the ballpark. Again you are still using drama and even lies now. You could have said that chemotherapy treatment can cost up to 40,000, but you said 'thousands for a pill". There is no sense exaggerating for effect.

www.ehow.com...

That link quotes roughtly 300 to 800 dollars for an 8 week course of treatment.
edit on 4-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


It's an exaggeration.. but not much of one.


No it is not. Not even a little one.
Look into chemotherapy pills. I have seen the bills myself.
Here is just one of the best examples here.

At $17,000 a month, Erbitux is one of the most expensive cancer drugs ever made.

source



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by beezzer
 


How did she illustrate what real conservatives were all about again?
With a catchphrase or by running to China to make a quick buck all while dishonoring her home country. The latter is a little more representative.

She has principles. Something that she has been steadfast in adhering to.

When did she go to China? Didn't know about that.


How well do you know her?

Why did she quit her job, that was pretty weak



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus

Originally posted by Kitilani

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Kitilani
 


"THousands for a pill" is an extreme exaggeration used for drama.


Nice to know that no one you know has ever had cancer then. How lucky for you.
Better check your "facts" again.
edit on 4-9-2011 by Kitilani because: (no reason given)


Yes, in fact both my parents had cancer. If you are talking about chemotherapy treatments, your quote is still way out of the ballpark. Again you are still using drama and even lies now. You could have said that chemotherapy treatment can cost up to 40,000, but you said 'thousands for a pill". There is no sense exaggerating for effect.

www.ehow.com...

That link quotes roughtly 300 to 800 dollars for an 8 week course of treatment.
edit on 4-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)


I am not sure what decade your parents were treated in but I stand fully behind what I said. That link is not MY link so take it up with the poster. Oh that is you.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kitilani

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


It's an exaggeration.. but not much of one.


No it is not. Not even a little one.
Look into chemotherapy pills. I have seen the bills myself.
Here is just one of the best examples here.

At $17,000 a month, Erbitux is one of the most expensive cancer drugs ever made.

source



Ok so was that one pill a month? I was not privvy to my father's health bills due to a wicked stepmother.

Ok, now then, is this expensive because the pharmaceutical companies just want to gouge us and Uncle Sam should just pick up the cost?
What is your point on this? As chemotherapy is clearly one of the more expensive treatments. So you feel that while my father had to pay for his own chemotherapy, that he should also have to pay for someone else's treatment?
Please, let's get to the bottom of this, as cost is relative.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Janky Red

Originally posted by beezzer

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by beezzer
 


How did she illustrate what real conservatives were all about again?
With a catchphrase or by running to China to make a quick buck all while dishonoring her home country. The latter is a little more representative.

She has principles. Something that she has been steadfast in adhering to.

When did she go to China? Didn't know about that.


How well do you know her?

Why did she quit her job, that was pretty weak



Janky it was about the petty lawsuits filed against her as an attack. If you didn't know what was going on, please research it before popping off about it.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Janky Red

How well do you know her?

Why did she quit her job, that was pretty weak

We've only met twice. Dinner once. China never came up.


Seriously? I don't know her. Though I know people who do.
And as for the reason she quit her job?
Ask her.



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kitilani

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus

Originally posted by Kitilani

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Kitilani
 


"THousands for a pill" is an extreme exaggeration used for drama.


Nice to know that no one you know has ever had cancer then. How lucky for you.
Better check your "facts" again.
edit on 4-9-2011 by Kitilani because: (no reason given)


Yes, in fact both my parents had cancer. If you are talking about chemotherapy treatments, your quote is still way out of the ballpark. Again you are still using drama and even lies now. You could have said that chemotherapy treatment can cost up to 40,000, but you said 'thousands for a pill". There is no sense exaggerating for effect.

www.ehow.com...

That link quotes roughtly 300 to 800 dollars for an 8 week course of treatment.
edit on 4-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)


I am not sure what decade your parents were treated in but I stand fully behind what I said. That link is not MY link so take it up with the poster. Oh that is you.



Lol I was the poster and that was my link. But clearly you have the mindset that because it is expensive someone else ought to be paying. Is that not your point of socialized medicine?
My other question here is did you believe that because the Democrats insist this healthcare insurance ponzi scheme will bring down costs of healthcare, that that is what is really going to happen? I can tell you that since obamacare passed my own premiums have just raised several hundred a month.
I think you could benefit from more research really. I think your point about seeing your families medical bills are completely beside the point here.

while we are on this subject, let's talk about something else here. When people know that the govt is going to pay for something, they will know they can raise the cost. It's just what happens. We have seen it happen in defense contracting.

edit on 4-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
edit on 4-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 05:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Ok so was that one pill a month? I was not privvy to my father's health bills due to a wicked stepmother.

Hardly. Folotyn is $35,000 a DOSE. There is a pretty long list. Then if you like, check HIV drugs, fertility drugs, etc.
Are you arguing that the exaggeration was pill instead of tablet, drop, or inject able?



Ok, now then, is this expensive because the pharmaceutical companies just want to gouge us and Uncle Sam should just pick up the cost?

Why do I have to choose between those two options?


What is your point on this? As chemotherapy is clearly one of the more expensive treatments. So you feel that while my father had to pay for his own chemotherapy, that he should also have to pay for someone else's treatment?


Um no.


Please, let's get to the bottom of this, as cost is relative.


Sure. Start making sense when you reply to me instead of using each post as a point from which to slowly pivot and attempt to put words in my mouth. So far most of what you wrote and argued with is sentences you made completely up yourself.
edit on 4-9-2011 by Kitilani because: (no reason given)





top topics
 
5
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join