Humans don't belong on earth?, page 3

reply to post by RadeonGFXRHumanGTXisAlien

Think about it.

I have. And I've debated it with other members. Go look up the threads created by itsthetooth.

Cats, dog etc, have fur, feathers, scales etc to protect them from their natural environment,

So did we at one point. We evolved the intelligence to build shelter and make clothing. A layer of fur was no longer necessary.

they dont need to live in houses,

Interesting that you chose two of the most domesticated animals as your examples then. Even feral cats seek shelter from weather conditions.

they are born perfect without dissabilities, due to evolution and the survival of the fittest.

Hardly. Mind you, there are fewer deleterious mutations witnessed for the exact reason that they typically impede sexual selection in some form in the wild.

Hell horses on their first day they are born, they are running around, not that i like horses, just pointing it out.

Different animals gestate at different rates and are born with different levels of maturity. By your logic, kangaroos must not be native to this planet either. Their young emerge after barely a month and move to their mother's pouch to complete their gestation. They more closely resemble an embryo when this occurs.

Those animals have perfect night vision, humans can barely see in the dark.

Define "perfect" in this context -- hyperbole doesn't make for good arguments. Further not all animals have night vision. Mammals with larger eyes (nocturnal monkeys, possums, raccoons…), carnivorous hunters, snakes, fish, nocturnal birds have it. On the other hand, prey species for many of these predators have relatively poor night vision. So it's neither universal nor perfect.

Humans on the other hand, need houses,

Because, due to our intelligence, we're able to move outside of our original range of habitation. What other animal is present globally that we didn't bring with us?

humans make the enviroment adapt to them,

Which is exactly the reason we don't have fur any more. You're rebutting your own thesis here.

human babies are too weak on their first day of birth, they born naked, hungry etc,

So are other animals.

it takes humans at least 18 years to be somewhat self sufficient.

Citation needed.

We need shelter to live, we can't live in the open, we'll die,

Only because we've moved out of our starting biome. And we're far from the only animal that requires some kind of shelter.

wolves will kill us, predators will kill us,

We're smarter than they are.

the cold will kill us,

See above.

we can't hunt, we have to kill cattle etc.

Where I grew up, hunting was the norm. If it weren't for game laws, we could have eaten year-round on what we hunted.

Animals are born perfect, survival of the fittes, if they're disabled theyre left to die,

If they're born perfect, then aren't they all the fittest?

humans on the other hand we have variation, some are disabled, some are smart, some are dumb, does the animals in the wild have this?

Yes, there's variation among animals as well.

Humans aren't a natural part of this ecosystem, mother nature is not our mother, but a cold hard bitch who wants us dead.

If you mean that humans originated somewhere other than Earth, then I disagree. If you mean that we've divorced ourselves from natural selection to the point that we're no longer really part of the rest of the world's interactions between animal species, then I'd agree.