It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
something should be done about this ... but what?
For this post, I will assume that everything you've said is perfectly correct and accepted as settled.
It seems that the only remaining problem we have is how to get pharmaceutical companies to take less profit while maintaining their operations.
New problem 1) How do we determine the correct amount of profit? Is it the number of dollars? The percentage return on their investment? Should it be industry wide profit or individual company profit? This is going to be a tough job requiring government laws which will be challenged for years.
New problem 2) Say a company has made their maximum allowed profit by September; why shouldn't they just close down for the year?
New problem 3) If the profit limits apply only to pharmaceutical companies, won't investors take out all their money and invest in a sector that doesn't have a limit on profits? I would.
New problem 4) As pharmaceuticals are so important, will they be prevented from closing down and going out of business if they don't like the new rules? Will they be prevented from moving to some country that doesn't have such rules? If the answer is "yes," how in the world will they be made to keep working?
I've got a couple of other questions, but I'm beginning to think the answer to YOUR question is "Sorry, nothing can be done." At least not the way you'd like it to be done.
You may, I fear, be very right. I wonder though, if society does not share your ideals, or just can't find a way to put them into practice. I could come down on either side of that question; I just don't know. I think it's important to know which it is.
Sadly there is no answer to this issue, at least not in reality. I have my ideals which sadly do not match the majority of society.
Originally posted by charles1952
You may, I fear, be very right. I wonder though, if society does not share your ideals, or just can't find a way to put them into practice. I could come down on either side of that question; I just don't know. I think it's important to know which it is.
Sadly there is no answer to this issue, at least not in reality. I have my ideals which sadly do not match the majority of society.
As you say, it's all quite sad. I wish I could think of a way out.
With respect,
Charles1952
Originally posted by maung
Maybe we should treat pharmacy like other organization company offering goods and service. If they sell something, they must make the drugs met what they claim and give warranty of it. I know it sounds so silly, but i work with repairing something, and if i failed, they wont pay me, or even worse they might ask me to pay them if the stuffs get worse. That is really not fair.
Seriously i think for every company offering goods and service, gov should put them in the same box, must be responsible for what it purpose. Consumer right protection must be the same for company selling drugs and other product. If it is not worked, it is broken. But if pharmacy want to stand behind foundation organization, they should not make a lots of profit. I have lots of family who work in big pharmacy. So i know the profit is really huge, hundreds percent of it. Mostly with medium and cheap drugs with no patent anymore, it mostly consist of corn flour with few another extract.
At least that is what happen in here.
I would be simply astonished if any pharmaceutical company made even 50% profit year after year. It may be possible, and others can so inform me, but I would rush to invest in such a company if that were so.
Originally posted by JibbyJedi
Why instantly cure for $2 when you can treat for $1,000s for years?
It's definitely a crime against humanity. Profits have always been worth more than life.
I would be simply astonished if any pharmaceutical company made even 50% profit year after year. It may be possible, and others can so inform me, but I would rush to invest in such a company if that were so.
1. The "R&D Scare" Argument. "This legislation...could deal a crippling blow to pharmaceutical innovation and research..."
The Facts:
The Pharmaceutical Industry is the most profitable in the U.S. in terms of profit margin. Ending price discrimination against seniors will not shut down new drug R&D. The industry:
• Spends less on R&D than goes into profits. In 1999, the top five pharmaceutical companies (ranked by sales) all allocated a higher proportion of their revenue to net income than to R&D.3
• Spends $11 billion annually on advertising and marketing.4
• Makes $26.2 billion annually in profits.5
• Has a profit margin of 28.7 percent, nearly three times higher than the profit margin of other manufacturers of branded consumer goods.6
• Ranks #1 inprofits among all industries on all measures: return on revenues, assets, and equity.5
The drug industry has cried wolf before about R&D - the sky didn't fall then, and it won't now:
• The brand name pharmaceutical industry said that increasing the availability of generic drugs, part of the 1984 Waxman-Hatch Act, threatened R&D. But over the five year period following passage of the legislation, pharmaceutical companies more than doubled their investment in research and development, from $4.1 billion to $8.4 billion.7
• In 1990, the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (PhRMA predecessor) opposed legislation enacted into law to reduce Medicaid drug prices because "ncentives for pharmaceutical research will be reduced."8 But between 1990 and 1997, pharmaceutical companies again more than doubled their spending on research and development, from $8.4 billion in 1990 to $18.9 billion in 1997.7
2. The Spectre of Price Controls Argument: "The 'Prescription Drug Fairness for Seniors Act' would place federal price controls on the prescription drug market..."
The Facts:
H.R. 664/S. 731 does not set prices.
It uses the purchasing power of Medicare's 40 million Beneficiaries to get the same low price as drug companies charge favored customers like HMOs, large insurers, and Federal agencies like the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense.
The Prescription Drug Fairness for Seniors Act does not tell drug companies what prices they must charge. They are free to negotiate with large volume purchasers and set any prices they choose. H.R. 664/S. 731 simply requires that the companies give seniors and people with disabilities on Medicare their best negotiated price.
Section 3c of the bill requires drug companies to make Medicare outpatient drugs available to pharmacies at the lower of (1) the lowest price paid by any agency or department of the United States or (2) the manufacturer's best price for the drug.
3. The Greedy Pharmacists Argument: "The legislation contains no guarantee that the discounts will be passed down to the elderly..."
The industry's profits were still an extraordinary 14% of sales, well above the median of 4.6% for other industries.2 A business that is consistently so profitable can hardly be considered risky.
On a related note, I looked at the Dutch version of one cancer research institute because I live here now (Koningin WIlhelmina Fonds Kankerbestrijding), one of the first lines in their year report was (literally translated) "We aren't looking for a cure for cancer as it is too complicated...." I never got any further to look at how many millions they wasted on not looking for a cure...
Originally posted by FoJAk
reply to post by Akragon
Yeah, I heard about this not too long ago. It really pisses me off (to say the least) that people are denied this because it won't make rich people richer. My father is riddled with cancer and I've been trying to find a way to get a hold of this stuff for his sake, but to no avail so far. It's disgusting the way we treat each other. No one wants to help anybody if there is not anything in it for themselves. I hate humans.
Originally posted by FoJAk
reply to post by Akragon
Yeah, I heard about this not too long ago. It really pisses me off (to say the least) that people are denied this because it won't make rich people richer. My father is riddled with cancer and I've been trying to find a way to get a hold of this stuff for his sake, but to no avail so far. It's disgusting the way we treat each other. No one wants to help anybody if there is not anything in it for themselves. I hate humans.