It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What you amount to. (the tea party)

page: 7
16
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 01:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus

Originally posted by Janky Red

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Janky Red
 


Private collectives? You mean corporations? Well, it's a known fact that communism is against capitallist venture. Lol.
There is community, and then there is communism.


Yes the Corporation,

the Tea Party Deity of Fortune

I am against the destruction of the American economy and the privatization of America political system.




And you view corporations as the destruction of the economy... that is so quintessential Marx.


Funny, but you haven't challenged anything that I have posted thus far...

I think you are being such a baby because the truth about your movement hurts your feelings.



edit on 3-9-2011 by Janky Red because: (no reason given)




posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 01:50 AM
link   
reply to post by Janky Red
 


A baby? lol ok, but really sometimes it's useless to argue with someone you know is not going to change his/her mind. Or maybe I'm just too tired right now. I have been fighting with my dishwasher this week. Oh yah, I apologize about the art comment too. Vic made me see the error of my ways

edit on 3-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 01:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by beezzer
 


They will have to back someone. Who do you think it will be, honestly?
edit on 3-9-2011 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)


If I had to guess. . . . . as much as I want to say Paul, it'd be Bachmann. Not that I'm giddy about that. (Patriot Act et al) but I want to look at the big picture.

Of course, this is only my humble opinion.



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 01:53 AM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


Would you vote for Bachmann if she was your other choice?



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 02:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by beezzer
 


Would you vote for Bachmann if she was your other choice?

Yes.
I'd even be interested in Palin. (Just to see heads explode)



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 02:07 AM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


No beezzer why?
You know neither Bachmann or Palin deserve to be among the names of Jefferson and Kennedy and the people that made this country the country to live in once.

And you know there are legitimate reasons why.
edit on 3-9-2011 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 02:08 AM
link   
Here's an ineresting article from Newsmax, and it's surprisingly pro Ron Paul

www.newsmax.com...



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 02:11 AM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 



Paul, by contrast, is not only the father of the modern liberty movement — the man who made it fashionable to believe in the constitution again — but he has been consistent over a lifetime and seemingly incorruptible. As a tax attorney Bachmann allegedly went after a taxpayer earning less than $10,000 a year — and at a time when Timothy Geithner, Obama’s Treasury Secretary, wasn’t paying HIS taxes. And in 2008 she voted for Nancy Pelosi's stimulus bill.

In contrast, Ron Paul has been the champion of the little guy, arguing for years, for example, against government taxing of waitresses' tips.



If that isn't enough for the Tea Party to understand.. nothing will be.


Bachmann has appeal to social conservatives. She is a Christian, a Lutheran, but then so is Ron Paul, who was Lutheran in upbringing and now attends a Baptist church. Paul refuses to promote his faith for political purposes but told a reporter in 2007 that he “believed in Jesus Christ as his personal savior” and sought God’s guidance in many of his important life decisions. He has been married to his wife, Carol, for 51 years.


This is a good honest man. Who wouldn't want to vote for him? He will give you an honest answer and explanation to any question.
edit on 3-9-2011 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 02:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by beezzer
 


No beezzer why?
You know neither Bachmann or Palin deserve to be among the names of Jefferson and Kennedy and the people that made this country the country to live in once.

And you know there are legitimate reasons why.
edit on 3-9-2011 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)



Kennedy was a womanizer and had extra marital affairs while in the WH. All those parties and such... you glorify him and then defame Palin.



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 02:18 AM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


That kind of stuff is human and not what I look at. It was not good of him and not the kind of man in personal life I aspire to be, but the rest of his actions cannot be denied. It's funny that is the route you took to attack him.

Kennedy on a collection of intellectuals and diplomats gathered in the white house:

"I think this is the most extraordinary collection of talent, of human knowledge, that has ever been gathered together at the White House, with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone. "



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 02:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


That kind of stuff is human and not what I look at. It was not good of him and not the kind of man in personal life I aspire to be, but the rest of his actions cannot be denied. It's funny that is the route you took to attack him.

Kennedy on a collection of intellectuals and diplomats gathered in the white house:

"I think this is the most extraordinary collection of talent, of human knowledge, that has ever been gathered together at the White House, with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone. "

I'm not trying to attack Kennedy, but the good ol boyz club mentality is so obvious here. Let JFK have women galore but if Sarah palin's daughter is preggie it's horrid. Such hypocrisy. I'm not convinced you hate Palin because you think she is unintelligent.



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 02:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by beezzer
 


No beezzer why?
You know neither Bachmann or Palin deserve to be among the names of Jefferson and Kennedy and the people that made this country the country to live in once.

And you know there are legitimate reasons why.
edit on 3-9-2011 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)


We actually need John Doe, Ms. Average, someone not bred for public service. We need someone who doesn't wantthe job to be POTUS.

And wth that, I'll have to sign off for a bit. Wife has a honey-do list.



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 02:27 AM
link   
Palin and all the other assclowns only hijacked the name only, they did not hijack the people's sentiments and beliefs that are/were behind the tea party. The congressional black caucus can call the tea party all the names they want, but it won't change the sentiments behind it. The MSM can lie about how the tea party is a joke and ridicule and marginalize it, but it won't change the sentiments behind it. The people who are onboard with what the tea party stands for at its core are still on board, and that is why the tea party is getting attacked from all sides. It is still powerful and it will be the catalyst for change that we can believe in. You remember that line, right?



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 02:31 AM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


I don't give a damn about Palin's daughter. I'm 25. Do you know how many young girls I've known to get pregnant? So yeah your assumption is wrong and my judgement on Palin is pure. She's just dumb and that's it. Facts is facts as they say.



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 02:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


I don't give a damn about Palin's daughter. I'm 25. Do you know how many young girls I've known to get pregnant? So yeah your assumption is wrong and my judgement on Palin is pure. She's just dumb and that's it. Facts is facts as they say.


Well, I didn't give a darn about Clinton and the blue dress either. It was his treachery that bothered me.



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 02:35 AM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


Yeah.. me too. That's the only thing we have agreed on.
I just wish he hadn't lied. People do do stupid things though. Not saying it's ok, but thats a lot of pressure.
edit on 3-9-2011 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 05:08 AM
link   
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
 


You know what? You have totally dissed and dismissed me through this whole thread and I donated to Ron Paul's campaign and was promoting The Creature From Jekyll Island years ago. I was telling people about Skull and Bones in the 80's, so you know what you can do with your 25 year old attitude. I was in the avante garde of Tea partyism a decade before you were born buddy.



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 07:17 AM
link   
Tea parties represent the angry republicans collective. I'd seriously like to meet these "liberals" and "independents" who participate in the tea parties. Mind you, I've come across folks who claimed they were independent, liberal, but then you get down to the issues, it turns out they're just Reagan Democrats who really held conservative beliefs, or republicans who were disillusioned with the republican party, but still support republican candidates! Democrats in the tea parties? What democrats are in the tea parties? As far as I am aware, all the tea party endorsed candidates are republicans, how the hell can there be democrats? Are we talking about hillary democrats? How many of them are in the tea parties and what idiot would thing the tea parties would benefit Hillary Clintons run to the presidency? Is there a tea party portion of the democratic party? Am I missing something here??

None-cohesive grassroots my ass



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 08:27 AM
link   
I began reading this with a sort of biased scrutiny and eventually completely agreed with it. Well said. True and needs to reach a wider audience. I always hesitate to latch on to any "party"label and noticed the hijacking of the TP as soon as when Palin put her stench on it. See they couldn't ignore it completely so they infiltrated it in order to steer it off the rails and steal its thunder like you said.



posted on Sep, 3 2011 @ 08:34 AM
link   
reply to post by AwakeinNM
 


As far as I'm concerned anyone who considers themselves to be "in" the TP but will vote for someone other than RP is an idiot.



new topics

top topics



 
16
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join