It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

wiki leaks tweeting strange codes???

page: 4
65
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 10:42 AM
link   
Heres a more suitable syntax to decrypt the file, which i adjusted to open it:


% openssl enc -d -aes-256-cbc -in sDgo3FDksdGwsrkrS.enc -out cablegate-201108300212.7z -k 'Gw0whe$PfehwH[W%$%0sfwFGOENqi24yHSFP[NKFwekqzcxGPAEGMq32pfewkjnwrHN]#%Fwedqkdg?WM43hgwr#$JhowdnwqQELFDWmenhwREWKwqeq$'


If you use linux/bsd then you should be able to just punch in that command and open the file, though for windows you would need this: www.openssl.org...

You only need to decrypt it if you downloaded the *.enc file the other day.

Otherwise you can just download the unencrypted cablegate-201108300212.7z file directly from here:
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:AUHKVFRXREM7DCVK54MBDBGHQNPHLG5J

Btw if no-one realised, its the full cablegate documents in html format (301650 files, 359 folders).

Ex; snippet of the contents:


....

1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 196248 cable/2007/03/07MADRID510.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 190007 cable/2007/03/07MADRID512.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 192239 cable/2007/03/07MADRID514.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 195582 cable/2007/03/07MADRID520.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 191184 cable/2007/03/07MADRID521.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 191369 cable/2007/03/07MADRID522.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 191286 cable/2007/03/07MADRID523.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 191419 cable/2007/03/07MADRID524.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 191313 cable/2007/03/07MADRID525.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 191114 cable/2007/03/07MADRID526.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 191333 cable/2007/03/07MADRID527.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 191260 cable/2007/03/07MADRID528.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 199862 cable/2007/03/07MADRID529.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 190678 cable/2007/03/07MADRID535.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 191199 cable/2007/03/07MADRID536.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 201582 cable/2007/03/07MADRID545.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 190453 cable/2007/03/07MADRID546.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 191291 cable/2007/03/07MADRID547.html
1970-01-01 01:00:00 ....A 191079 cable/2007/03/07MADRID548.html

...


edit on 2-9-2011 by InsideYourMind because: quote boxes




posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 10:47 AM
link   
I'm looking at the unpacked 60gb file(not the entire originally 1.4gb insurance file), but the latest 557mb released file that unpacks to almost 60gb, and as you say it is basically a backup of their website in html format, all can be read of course, but I'm not sure there is anything that is going to be groundbreaking in any of this. So far I'm smelling a Mossad rat, more investigation is definitely needed atm though.

Seriously what sort of truth can we expect from some imbeciles who took a bribe to remove the bank of America cables, time will tell, still smelling that rat though.
edit on 2-9-2011 by Haxsaw because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 10:52 AM
link   
The "OpenSSL=" comand string means "Open Secure Socket Layer" in reference to file name ### which is AES256 encrypted. The "Code" string prior to that is the "password" to activate the AES256 encrypted file.

I'm too skeptical to bother doing it as I have no idea what is hidden behind or torjaned within the file. The fact that it is zipped means it could house an .exe (executable) virus or spyware program. I'm going to sit this one out and wait for the more brazen amongst us to explore what is hidden there.

Based on the feedback so far it appears to be a comma-delimited text file that may be needed to be imported into some type of database or spreadsheet in order to read properly. I'm looking forward to seeing if this anything meaningful. My opinion based on what I know now is that this is simply a full archive of all of the cable data they have obtained to date and has nothing to do with the insurance file they referenced earlier in the year. I suspect this is simply a distribution attempt to ensure their archives remain unscathed by hacker attacks and live in perpetuity in the public domain.

We'll see...



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 10:55 AM
link   
Just digging about on the web - wikileaks site cable page has this snippet:

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

So that is it, they are all out.

I missed this B of A action - am I supposed to beleive that Assange took a bribe to bury some cables about them? Because I don't beleive it. If it is true then the whole #ing world is not the same as I thought it was. Seriously? No way!



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 10:59 AM
link   
Its hard to know what to believe these days does anyone have a link to the accusations that wikileaks accepted bribes to remove Bank Of Americas content?



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 11:03 AM
link   
This may get me offed by the TPTB but I have the file, but I'm not sure how to decrypt it. Any clues?



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 11:08 AM
link   
I am totally out of my league with all this stuff- I'm a cyber moron.
If any of this stuff turns out to be interesting info, could someone post a simplified summary of it for people like me??
Thankie kindly!



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 11:09 AM
link   
From what I have read - what is the big deal with this file. All the cable are on the web site in a searchable form:

www.theregister.co.uk...



"Given that the full database file is downloadable from hundreds of sites there is only one internally rational action," WikiLeaks said, adding that it wants to use crowdsourcing techniques to hunt for juicy nuggets in the vast treasure trove of information.

edit on 2-9-2011 by Shamatt because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 11:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by Bluesma
I am totally out of my league with all this stuff- I'm a cyber moron.
If any of this stuff turns out to be interesting info, could someone post a simplified summary of it for people like me??
Thankie kindly!


twitter.com...#!/search?q=%23wlfind

This is where wikileaks has told people to tweet they're findings i suggest keeping an eye out there.
edit on 2-9-2011 by Terrion because: (no reason given)

edit on 2-9-2011 by Terrion because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 11:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by Bluesma
I am totally out of my league with all this stuff- I'm a cyber moron.
If any of this stuff turns out to be interesting info, could someone post a simplified summary of it for people like me??
Thankie kindly!


I'm in the same boat here....if anyone could post a 'coles notes' version, I would also appreciate it! Please and thanks!



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 11:14 AM
link   
tryed to break it down by separating the characters of this:
AES256CBC: Gw0whe$PfehwH[W%$%0sfwFGOENqi24yHSFP[NKFwekqzcxGPAEGMq32pfewkjnwrHN]#%Fwedqkdg?WM43hgwr#$JhowdnwqQELFDWmenhwREWKwqeq$

and this is what I got, just a bunch of characters lumped together:

AESCBC: GPHWFGOENHSFPNKFGPAEGMHNFWMJQELFDWREWK

256: 00243243

256: 0$[%$%024[32]#%?#$$

wwhefehwsfwqiywekqzcxqpfewkjnwrwedqkdghgwrhowdnwqmenhwwqeq

I can only get this far, then I'm blank on what it means. This might be a complex computer code and what the purpose of it is unknown to me.

I haven't read a book on quantum physics so I'm kind of in the dark on this one.
edit on 2-9-2011 by FreedomCommander because: incomplete



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 11:19 AM
link   
reply to post by FreedomCommander
 


you really don't have to stress over it... they released an unencrypted version you can download. A for effort tho!



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 11:24 AM
link   
reply to post by Shamatt
 


they weren't two days ago, that's the big deal. websites just a mirror someone threw up for the files.



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 11:40 AM
link   
My understanding is that this is the un redacted version meaning they havent even self filterd the file and it has all the peoples real names in it.



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 11:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Tom_Proctor
It still is parts of the insurance file, and includes mostly everything in it.

A few weeks ago Assange took a bribe from Bank Of America and removed Bank of America cables. What a twat.


I'd say a twat would state something like that, without offering an ounce of evidence nor dare i say actual proof along with the comment...so proctor are you a twat? Or have you got some evidence or proof of this?
edit on 2/9/2011 by spikey because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 12:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by Haxsaw
I'm looking at the unpacked 60gb file(not the entire originally 1.4gb insurance file), but the latest 557mb released file that unpacks to almost 60gb, and as you say it is basically a backup of their website in html format, all can be read of course, but I'm not sure there is anything that is going to be groundbreaking in any of this. So far I'm smelling a Mossad rat, more investigation is definitely needed atm though.

Seriously what sort of truth can we expect from some imbeciles who took a bribe to remove the bank of America cables, time will tell, still smelling that rat though.
edit on 2-9-2011 by Haxsaw because: (no reason given)


Proof please...failing that, some evidence to go on would be nice..as for staff at WL being imbeciles, they are actually still breathing, so not that imbecilic are they...add that about 50% of people responding to this thread can't open the file WL created and encrypted, with the key WL provided, and i'd avise you to watch who you're calling names mate.



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 12:10 PM
link   
reply to post by InsideYourMind
 


Thanks for that post mate,

Should help a lot of us out a bit.

Cheers.



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 12:25 PM
link   
reply to post by spikey
 


I believe he's admitted to being "blackmailed".

“We are under a kind of blackmail in relation to those documents that will be dealt with over time”

LINK

Time will tell, but so far I see no cables that are going to change a great deal in this world. Also seems to be a lack of cables regarding Israeli diplomats, and I can understand some cables being kept for insurance, but bearing in mind the little impact the cables that have been released so far have had on the big picture, then I think its time to release some of the best he/they have, and if he has already, well we are going to need alot more evidence than wiki-leaks to bring on the revolution this world needs to remove the corrupt politicians/banks/reserve-banks/intelligence-agencies/etc.



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 12:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Haxsaw
reply to post by spikey
 


I believe he's admitted to being "blackmailed".

“We are under a kind of blackmail in relation to those documents that will be dealt with over time”

LINK

Time will tell, but so far I see no cables that are going to change a great deal in this world. Also seems to be a lack of cables regarding Israeli diplomats, and I can understand some cables being kept for insurance, but bearing in mind the little impact the cables that have been released so far have had on the big picture, then I think its time to release some of the best he/they have, and if he has already, well we are going to need alot more evidence than wiki-leaks to bring on the revolution this world needs to remove the corrupt politicians/banks/reserve-banks/intelligence-agencies/etc.


Well, at least i thank you for providing a link and addressing the matter somewhat.

However, i'm curious as to how this from Assange;


“We are under a kind of blackmail in relation to those documents that will be dealt with over time,” he said, though did not divulge the kind of blackmail the organisation was facing or from whom, saying only that “there are a range of possibilities.”


(quoted from a story from the link you provided (www.frontlineclub.com...)

Translates in your mind into this from your post;



Seriously what sort of truth can we expect from some imbeciles who took a bribe to remove the bank of America cables


I'd be amazed if Assange and his organisation wasn't under attempted blackmail, bribery, threats, fake sex charges, and a multitude of other equally nasty methods employed to either discredit him (and therefore his organisation by association), curry favour or outright shut him/them up.

How does any of these obvious 'running scared' tactics employed by the guilty, constitute evidence or proof of them being imbeciles or taking a bribe? The simple answer is that it does neither.

But thanks for taking the trouble to reply.



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 12:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Haxsaw
 


yeah little impact?
haVE UREAD THEM ALL?
THIS IS IT PEOPLE TRUST ME




top topics



 
65
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join