It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Strange Coincidence ?

page: 2
21
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 03:20 PM
link   
Simple wikipedia search will refute this one
Abraham Lincoln ( February 12, 1809 – April 15, 1865)
John Fitzgerald "Jack" Kennedy (May 29, 1917 – November 22, 1963)

As for the rest, you can imagine that most of it is not true




posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 03:47 PM
link   
reply to post by hp1229
 


So I was tricked ?


edit on 1-9-2011 by skepticconwatcher because: I believed it at first until I saw the other comments.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 04:20 PM
link   
why do people have to troll.

same guys who pulled the fire alarm in school i guess. time wasters.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 05:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by GmoS719
Some one lied to you...
John Wilks booth was born in 1838.
Which disproves this whole theory.
Crappy posts like this that get starred are embarrassing.


In all probability nobody lied to the OP - they may not have checked the DOB of Booth is all most likely. Who is John Wilks? Could it be John Wilkes Booth? The opening post isn't a theory... It's a collection of interesting "coincidences" that haven't been disproved at all - in fact nearly all of them are true.

All your post proves is that you had nothing interesting to say.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 08:33 PM
link   
Yes, the Kennedy > Lincoln connection is just too much.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 09:15 PM
link   
This is very interesting! Not sure if it is a conspiracy but there is a lot of coincidences in both cases ,thank you for the great post .



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by GmoS719
Some one lied to you...
John Wilks booth was born in 1838.
Which disproves this whole theory.


edit on 1-9-2011 by GmoS719 because: (no reason given)

edit on 1-9-2011 by GmoS719 because: (no reason given)


That can be up for questioning. All the other coincidences match up. Just because one does not, does not mean all of them do not match up. I think it was a ritual. Their is no way he would have been president if he held those ideals. No matter what time era



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 11:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by GmoS719
Some one lied to you...
John Wilks booth was born in 1838.
Which disproves this whole theory.


edit on 1-9-2011 by GmoS719 because: (no reason given)

edit on 1-9-2011 by GmoS719 because: (no reason given)


Yeah but that doesn't count since Lee Harvey Oswald did not shoot the President! So who is to say that the real killer wasn't associated with the true date of John Wilkes-Booth's birthday, what ever that date might be.



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 12:11 AM
link   
reply to post by Pimander
 


And what do you have to say that is interesting?
I was just pointing out that the date is wrong.
At least I contributed to the thread.
You didn't contribute anything.



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 12:41 AM
link   
reply to post by hp1229
 


The summon of demons and their aid is at play here.....

Like pretending to be mysterious and faking to be in posession of 'hidden' knowledge I must add that I can not reveil any more....



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 04:05 AM
link   




what could this mean ?!?!?

edit on 2-9-2011 by nightstalker78 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 06:34 AM
link   
Maybe Kennedy was the reincarnation of Lincoln? Just a thought.



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 07:18 AM
link   
How are you coming up with disaster Osama? Or am I missing something?



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 07:59 AM
link   
That is awesome, but can you take this information and make a prediction on the next assasination or disaster? I do belive all were planned events created by our own government, even old honest abe. Good find!



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 09:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by GmoS719
reply to post by Pimander
 
You didn't contribute anything.

I explained how 3 things you posted were incorrect. It's called denying ignorance - in this case yours.

edit on 2/9/11 by Pimander because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 10:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by ThinkingCap
Wow it's too bad I couldn't record my reaction to this thread. I just poured coffee on myself reading this thread, after accidentally spitting some out. .

Hah... But yeah. No coincidences here.

I bet they were both born on a black moon too.


I am assuming you are going through the 'First it is ridiculed' portion of your signature ?



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 10:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by skepticconwatcher
reply to post by hp1229
 


So I was tricked ?


edit on 1-9-2011 by skepticconwatcher because: I believed it at first until I saw the other comments.

Nope you were not tricked.

As the OP indicates, I received this as an email. It is not my theory or email.



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 10:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by zatara
reply to post by hp1229
 


The summon of demons and their aid is at play here.....

Like pretending to be mysterious and faking to be in posession of 'hidden' knowledge I must add that I can not reveil any more....


??? Absolutely no clue what you meant by that.

Care to explain por favor?



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 11:00 AM
link   
More crazy coincidences:


(click to open player in new window)



posted on Sep, 2 2011 @ 12:11 PM
link   
reply to post by lilowl53
 

Thanks. I received the OP as email. However there is a talk about the Jewish Holy book containing several such codes linking several events (past and present). Thats why I decided to post it under 'General Conspiracies'.




top topics



 
21
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join