General: China Could Be Planning Surprise Missile Attack on United States

page: 5
42
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 02:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by eLPresidente
There will be no war...


This is what The Communist wants us to think.

He wants us to let our guard down so he can destroy us.

That is his way.




posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 02:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Pervius
 


from my limited knowledge on asian geo politics the japanese are kind of the most hated kids on the block in mainland asia for that whole rape and pillaging thing so a chinese japanese alliance is more in the realms of clancy then reality. i think if anything japan will aly with the enemys of china due to the regions mutual fear and mistrust of china (ie there more scared of china then japan these days)



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 02:05 PM
link   
reply to post by USAisdevil
 


Yes, yes...

None of which really conflicts with the fact that the US is sitting on it's own very large reserves and can and will produce it's own if push comes to shove.

None of that conflicts with what I've posted actually it confirms the rather large amounts that it has at it's disposal.


Also and this is very important so pay attention....

Just like many here love to state that "arrogant Americans" like to believe that China doesnt have a capability that the USA is aware of conversely realize and understand that China does not know what the US has up it's sleeve either.

Did you ever stop to think about WHY The pentagon isn't really worried or has protested about this supposedly potential problem?

Think about that for a second.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 02:08 PM
link   
reply to post by TDawgRex
 


****Secret transcripts from China******

Chinese Secret Agent #1: Hold the super secret missle attack!

Chinese Secret Agent#2: Um, okay. Why?

Chinese Secret Agent #1: It's on ATS now.

Chinese Secret Agent#2: Do they say anything about planet Nirubu? How about my thread on Indigo Children?

Chinese Secret Agent#1: You have 15 stars. Awesome!



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 02:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by TDawgRex
 


****Secret transcripts from China******

Chinese Secret Agent #1: Hold the super secret missle attack!

Chinese Secret Agent#2: Um, okay. Why?

Chinese Secret Agent #1: It's on ATS now.

Chinese Secret Agent#2: Do they say anything about planet Nirubu? How about my thread on Indigo Children?

Chinese Secret Agent#1: You have 15 stars. Awesome!


****Secret transcript from US intelligence monitoring Chinese conversations****

Agent1: Sir we have their locations, identities, all configured and ready for targeting.

Intelligence director: Don't alert the Pentagon, our government still needs to borrow more money from them.





posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 02:20 PM
link   
reply to post by TDawgRex
 


No. They would be impossibly out numbered. The US would call on its European allies, and it's likely it would also make it's middle east allies join too. The African Union is unofficially allied to the European Union as well. It would result in complete annihilation of China.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 02:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by TDawgRex
 


****Secret transcripts from China******

Chinese Secret Agent #1: Hold the super secret missle attack!

Chinese Secret Agent#2: Um, okay. Why?

Chinese Secret Agent #1: It's on ATS now.

Chinese Secret Agent#2: Do they say anything about planet Nirubu? How about my thread on Indigo Children?

Chinese Secret Agent#1: You have 15 stars. Awesome!




Thanks Beez...I needed the chuckle.

2nd



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 02:28 PM
link   
reply to post by TDawgRex
 
All in good fun bud. Just a little lightness to a dark subject!




posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 02:36 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 




I'm still laughing...

Well with that I'm off to write another outside the box controversial thread on an unrelated topic.

Peace.
edit on 1-9-2011 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 02:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by Pegasus2000

Originally posted by TinfoilTP

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by TDawgRex
 






General: China Could Be Planning Surprise Missile Attack on United States

Ok what has China been waiting for? sorry for saying but after what america and NATO did to Libya and america to Iraq China has every rtight to attack in Self defense it would be best for china and russia to join forces.


Anti-American much?

China will collapse under its own weight of too many mouths to feed. One deadly famine in that dense population would make the Black Death of the middle ages look like childs play. We don't need to do anything, mother nature will take care of them, lol.


Yet another reason for china to take the US soil, if everything goes down the tubes ie. world economy, what other option for china to do than attack the US with heavy force and take it for its own. Mostly for the Agriculture infrastructure. Don't quote me on this, this is only Theory. There's many scenarios and possible outcomes.


There's that little thing called the Pacific ocean in the way. They will never get here unless Scotty beams them over. That one aircraft carrier they got would have to make over a million escort trips, assuming it could survive one
.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 02:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by TinfoilTP
 





Anti-American much?

China will collapse under its own weight of too many mouths to feed. One deadly famine in that dense population would make the Black Death of the middle ages look like childs play. We don't need to do anything, mother nature will take care of them, lol.


I could say the same the thing about america collapsing





Anti-American much?


So you defend americas war crimes of the past and current conflict in libya? and no thats not Anti-American dont get me wrong on that part.
edit on 1-9-2011 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)


USA is not overpopulated

What war crimes, lol.

That Libya War is run by NATO lead by France and Britain, US is backup support roll. Can't pin it on the US. We are only obligating our treaties legally as a nation. No crimes involved there.
Kadaffi is gone, good riddence. With that comment you obviously defend the dictators of the world deliberately distorting and flipping the positions of the bad guys with the good guys, and you are not even very good at it.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 04:51 PM
link   
You ever wonder if the Chinese stop to ponder how many blades of grass are in the U.S.?



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 04:53 PM
link   
meh i doubt the Chinese will attack...yet. they are currently modernizing their military so give it a few years and China's military will be far more up to date and with unfathomable amounts of troops at their disposal and manufacturing capacity that is just unimaginable I really would bet my money on China.

And just to add to it that it wont just be china, I would think every enemy or ex-enemy will be launching attacks as well and with only the UK and possibly some European countries as allies which I doubt would offer any backing anyway I really don't think the US would stand a chance.

You think just because your guns are bigger that a thousand to one smaller guns wouldn't stand a chance? The US is falling and China is rising get over it, there is a new boss rising on the block.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 04:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by TinfoilTP

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by TinfoilTP
 





Anti-American much?

China will collapse under its own weight of too many mouths to feed. One deadly famine in that dense population would make the Black Death of the middle ages look like childs play. We don't need to do anything, mother nature will take care of them, lol.


I could say the same the thing about america collapsing





Anti-American much?


So you defend americas war crimes of the past and current conflict in libya? and no thats not Anti-American dont get me wrong on that part.
edit on 1-9-2011 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)


USA is not overpopulated

What war crimes, lol.

That Libya War is run by NATO lead by France and Britain, US is backup support roll. Can't pin it on the US. We are only obligating our treaties legally as a nation. No crimes involved there.
Kadaffi is gone, good riddence. With that comment you obviously defend the dictators of the world deliberately distorting and flipping the positions of the bad guys with the good guys, and you are not even very good at it.


The fact that you got the name wrong of the basis of your argument makes me think you don't ever read any news. You just listen to the bull#.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 05:01 PM
link   
You guys keep saying we'd kick the crap out of them, but we can't even win wars in the middle east.

Something tells me the country is too 'pussified' to take on another superpower right now.

We used to have nuts!



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 05:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by iamhobo
You guys keep saying we'd kick the crap out of them, but we can't even win wars in the middle east.

Something tells me the country is too 'pussified' to take on another superpower right now.

We used to have nuts!



The problem is, we don't wage war anymore, we wage policing actions.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 05:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by iamhobo
You guys keep saying we'd kick the crap out of them,


Who said that?

Where?

Not in this thread...

Sources please?


Something tells me the country is too 'pussified' to take on another superpower right now.

We used to have nuts!


Who's advocating war here?
edit on 1-9-2011 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 05:30 PM
link   
reply to post by SLAYER69
 




Originally posted by anumohi
Chinas stupid, we have subs all around china waiting to deliver them to their maker. what the Chinese don't understand is the US's newest and most devastating weapons that far exceed the hydrogen bomb plus our space based laser systems that are locked on to all of Chinas satellites....Chinas got a really big surprise coming if they want to push the envelop



Originally posted by SirMike
reply to post by auraelium
 


I have to agree. Any first strike from China would be met with an overwhelming counter attack. Even if the Chinese did launch a first strike on the US the silos are so hardened (remember they were built to take multiple direct hits from Soviet MIRVS) that a fair number would survive. This doesn’t even take into consideration the US strategic missile boats.



Originally posted by auraelium
Thats the greatest load of rubbish ive ever heard, why would china attack the USA? they would be nuked to high heaven before their first bomb would hit, as my mother used to say "some people would believe anything".


That's not all of the first page, I just got tired of copying and pasting...

I hope you were being sarcastic
edit on 1-9-2011 by iamhobo because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 05:33 PM
link   
To be honest, China doesn't have enough delivery systems to make an ICBM attack on the U.S. mainland worth it. They have around 24 missiles, total, with practical range to strike -parts- of the mainland. Even if they have a few systems we don't know about, total delivery systems is likely well below 50 - well within what our current ABM systems can handle, and minor in terms of losses to attrition, since a lot of those will be doubled-up on targets.

Now - an attack on one of our allies in the region - such as Korea.... that's entirely plausible. Though it would not really accomplish much at this point, as China has no capability to stand against a concentrated U.S. effort to dispatch them from a region.

I'm not saying they aren't big boys on the block. I'm just saying we're bigger and have better toys to use.

Besides, we're on the way to destruction and have no chance to survive. They should simply allow us to make our time. Someone set up us the burst.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 05:37 PM
link   
reply to post by iamhobo
 


That's it?

Seriously?

For example:

If we fired on Russia the way the article describes this scenario the Russian would be more than capable of the same as you quoted doing to us! That isn't saying "they'd kick our asses" Those are describing Armageddon. Reread them again objectively

They are stating the truth that any Nuclear attack on another nuclear armed country would be retaliated by said target nation. You do realize that would mean the complete and utter destruction of both don't you?





new topics
top topics
 
42
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join