It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Man Faces Life In Jail For Recording Police

page: 9
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in


posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 09:49 PM

Yet this is legal and many other invasions of privacy to the average citizen!

Filming up women's skirts is ruled legal
Law doesn't ban voyeurism in public, Supreme Court says

posted on Sep, 4 2011 @ 11:54 PM
Ohh Americans don't really care. They're too lazy and ignorant. Police? They think they're the protectors of freedom and righteousness and and all that honest razzle dazzlez. The police can never do wrong!

Police officer: Spread your cheeks.
Typical American: Sir yes sir!

posted on Sep, 5 2011 @ 02:05 PM

Originally posted by SuperCereal
If he gets sentenced we should all organize a mass protest and demand his immediate release. Its ridiculous what they try to get away with nowadays.


posted on Sep, 5 2011 @ 03:05 PM
Don't know if anyone posted this already or not.

posted on Sep, 5 2011 @ 05:07 PM
The problem is that they've figured out that they don't answer to anyone, only the public, and they could give two shyts about us. There is no federal agency that will swoop down and make them stop, they can just choose to ignore any rulings.

Even when the supreme court says they are wrong they just plod ahead, Illinois especially.

Illinois is as close to a true socialist state as you'll find in America, nothing surprises me about them at this point. And these are the people in the White House right now, a scary thought.

If there was ever a time to take Bill Shakespheres advice, and kill all the lawyers, it is now.

posted on Sep, 5 2011 @ 08:14 PM
holy swiss cheese, man i feel sorry for that dude, and did u see the vid of the black girl getting blasted in the face by that white male cop? all i can say if WOW, or the dude that got shot in the back and died from that other cop, wtf is goin on with this country, where this is actually being captured on vid and nothing is being done to these obviously f#ckin crazy cops, i mean, all i have to do to legally kill somebody is get a badge? WAKE UP PEOPLE, ARE WE ONLY GONNA CARE IF IT HAPPENS TO US?

posted on Sep, 7 2011 @ 12:05 PM
reply to post by hawkiye
How did the Michigan police officer known on this website as "BeakerOfBorg" have me censored and get away with calling me "paranoid and delusional" last spring when I said u.s. federal and ILLinois state's attorneys would not prosecute the Chicago Police "Red Squad" and FBi "Squad Eight" for hate crimes that you can view video-recordings of by looking up HuntingBear, PaulTerrenceWiggins on the website and which law enforcement agent is using "Social Exclusion" against us indigenous Terrapin tribespeople by calling himself "ChiefBigRooster"?

edit on 7-9-2011 by ChiefHuntingBear because: typo

edit on 7-9-2011 by ChiefHuntingBear because: Three dots should not appear after the url for

edit on 7-9-2011 by ChiefHuntingBear because: ommission

edit on 7-9-2011 by ChiefHuntingBear because: Three dots do not appear after the url for

edit on 7-9-2011 by ChiefHuntingBear because: Why can't I have an avatar?

edit on 7-9-2011 by ChiefHuntingBear because: poor typing

edit on 7-9-2011 by ChiefHuntingBear because: getting this just right

posted on Sep, 9 2011 @ 05:11 PM
It just shows how everyday were getting closer and closer to police state. I heard of a story on how a woman was put on a police list saying she was a dangerous woman. That woman was arrested for attending a Ron Paul rally.

posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 11:19 AM
This is EXTREME BS!!!

posted on Sep, 13 2011 @ 11:25 PM
In all states it is illegal to audio tape a conversation without consent defend this guy all you want but what he did as trivial as it seems is against the law.Check your states laws on this site to see if its legal in your state or not more then likely it is.

Now making a video in a public place does not fall under this at least in Ma we just had a case where a rather corrupt "police" officer beat the tar out of a guy and it was video taped, that officer and others involved in the case tried to sue the person who made the tape claiming it was illegal wiretapping and it was thrown out since in public you can be video taped and there is no expectation of privacy, but if it had been a tape recorder or digital recorder and not a video camera this would have went differently.So call it B.S that they are gonna try to get this guy for 75 years in prison but he was breaking the law like it or not.

posted on Sep, 16 2011 @ 07:52 PM

“A statute intended to prevent unwarranted intrusions into a citizen’s privacy cannot be used as a shield for public officials who cannot assert a comparable right of privacy in their public duties,” the judge wrote in his decision dismissing the five counts of eavesdropping charges against defendant Michael Allison.

Judge throws out wiretapping case. Finally. This is what we were waiting for.
edit on 16/9/2011 by PsykoOps because: (no reason given)

new topics

top topics

<< 6  7  8   >>

log in