Bush is an idiot., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 4-4-2003 @ 12:37 AM by MilanLoyalty
I hope Bush Does Not Get Re-Elected, But you Know He will.

By The Way, off the Record Al Gore won the Popular Vote of this country, so if you want to ask what the people asked for, The People asked for Al Gore, Unfortunetly The system makes little sense and Bush was able to get a Victory through the Electoral Collage.

Some of you Criticise Clinton and the Democratic Administration for Cutting Military Expenses, therefore weakening The Military, but if you Had any Education at all, you would realise that what he did made some sense.

After Ronald Reagan reformed the Tax system in 1986, the United States Fell into a 4 trillion Dollar deficit by 1993. So Clinton Figured if He Cut Military Spending and Raised Taxes he would reduce That defecit, which makes sense.

Mr. Bush can Cut Taxes all he wants to win the Hearts of the people, It will Only Hurt This Country In The Long Run. Which has led to This War with Iraq topic.

Mr. Bush couldn't Use His Brains Or His Advisors Or The Fiscal or The Monetary Policies to Stimulate The Economy if His Life depended on it. As we all know The Economy has been going to waste since The Man moved into the White House.

So since historically Short and Sucessfull Wars have been Good For The Economy+The Oil Control he will Get, mr. Bush decides Thats its a Great Idea to Attack Iraq.

And Please don't give me The "Operation Iraqi freedom, or Its about Weapons of Mass distruction Thing." because its simply C***.

You think Mr. Bush gives 2 cents about The Iraqi People, heck no common why would he, because he feels symphatetic. We are talking about a Guy who Broke all records of assigning Death penalties while he was in Texas , he doesn't feel bad about Anybody, he doesn't want to Liberate The People, he wants to get his hands on The Oil.

And as far as The Weapons of Mass Destruction are concerned.....who doesn't have them these Days, its not about that, CIA couldn't Link Saddam to any Terrorist attacks at all, why would The Man Start Now.

And these CNN Former generals, and war tactic analysts are the biggest bunch of Idiots I have Came across on.

When faced with a question Like, " Do you believe saddam will use Biological Weapons On The US Led Coalition." They say , No because That would Prove Him wrong the whole Time.

NO IT WOULDN'T YOU MORON, BECAUSE THAT WASN'T OR SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN A QUESTION IN THE 1ST PLACE. The Question wasn't if He Has Biological Weapons or Not, because we all Know he does, but the Question is , Would he have used them on The US Citizens? No he wouldn't he Had 12 Years after he was embarrased by the US and he did nothing, why would he start Now. And As Far as I'm Conerned He certanly has The Right to use those weapons right now in Order to defend Himself.


reply posted on 4-4-2003 @ 12:48 AM by MilanLoyalty
If Saddam is Torturing his peopel, he has been doing it for years, yet why didn't Bush Senior feel Bad for them and decide to Liberate Them back then, because he doesn't Care.

Rebuilding Iraq will Only favor The US, after they rebuild it, they will set up American Businesses and Companies in The Heart of Iraq and Make federal revenue of the Oil, its a Genious Idea.

But its as Evil as anything gets.

Iraq has fought 3 wars if You count the Gulf War, in the Past 15 years, They are worn out, They are Practically The size of a Large American state, Yet they still manage to defend themselves from Technological Superiors Like US and Britain. THAT TAKES BALLS, Those Men are Dying By The Numbers In Iraq to defend their Country, Yet Bush has The Nerve to say, that The Iraqi People are Glad The US showed up, who is he kidding, You or himself. Glad about what getting Bombarded......gimme a Break.

Britain and US are using Satellites, Superior Weapons, night visions, Tomahawks...., Unbelieveable AirCraft The Total Packgage along with Britain, Australia and Spain....And The Italian Support....and yet This small country with nothing but The Pride of Their Country and alot weaker weapons has managed to defend themselves in some ways, Like I said IT TAKES BALLS.

BY THE WAY I LOVE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, AND I LOVE THE LIFESTYLE, YOU GUYS ARE FREAT, BUT FORGIVE ME WHEN I SAY SO. I JUST DONT FEEL THAT THE GOVERNMENT RIGHT NOW IS BEING FAIR AT ALL.


reply posted on 4-4-2003 @ 10:35 PM by TheCatalyst
Very good posts. I agree with your opinion of Mr. Bush.



reply posted on 5-4-2003 @ 06:50 PM by Thomas Crowne
5POF, why did you even bother responding to this thread? The poster is so out of touch with both history and reality that I suspect that the poster is one of "them" to which I refer when I talk about history revisionists. There are so many flaws, inaccuracies and downright malicious lies that one would spend all night wording a response and in the long run it wouldn't be read because the truth takes a little more time and education than a sentence such as "Some of you Criticise Clinton and the Democratic Administration for Cutting Military Expenses, therefore weakening The Military, but if you Had any Education at all, you would realise that what he did made some sense."....

Those who wish to rewrite history like saying "Reagan's tax cut caused a deficit" as if there aren't some of us around that were conscious and sober then. Truth is, I had my moments of sobriety and do remember.

See, under better circumstances Reaganomics would have been a great thing. As a matter of fact, it proved to all with the ability to learn that placeing money into the hands of those who actually earned it is better for both the economy and the government coffers. Problem was we had this little "Cold War" thing going on. You know, that was the little commotion that prevented us from having to live under the rules of the Soviet Empire? Anyway, the costs of that war was more than what the increase in tax income was. Reagan did spend more than we had in order to defeat the Russians, but he did win.

See, 5POF, that was just for one point. Some of the poster's point is so vague and unsubstantial you'd have to attempt to build his case for him in order to turn it around and shoot it down. Now, who has that kind of time on their hands?

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 11 days ago with 59 member flags
The CIA in Australia: America\'s Foreign Watergate
  Posted 1 days ago with 19 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 11 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 10 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 10 days ago with 10 member flags