It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The idea isn’t simply to flirt with cataclysmic danger, but to bring a small object (they suggest a 10-meter object called 2008EA9 that will pass nearby in 2049) into a loop around the Earth so we can study it closely for a few years. If we can get the art of capturing asteroids orbitally down to a science, we could use it to temporarily make asteroids into Earth-bound satellites (orbiting at about twice the distance of the moon), mine them for minerals, and then send them on their ways.
Originally posted by predator0187
This is the future people. This is how we are going to advance. We will have to do this and get minerals and elements that are not on the earth or that the earth has in limited supplies.
Pred...edit on 31-8-2011 by predator0187 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by predator0187
reply to post by kn0wh0w
Sure, hydrogen advancement, absolutely agree. But, where do we get the hydrogen from? It's not very abundant on earth and any process we use to make it creates a ton of CO2. If we could harvest it off an asteroid or meteor andhave an abundance of it, maybe hydrogen would take off more and become more of an option.
Pred...
Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by kn0wh0w
Thank god people like you aren't responsible for green lighting scientific research, otherwise we'd still be banging rocks together.
Originally posted by predator0187
This is the future people. This is how we are going to advance. We will have to do this and get minerals and elements that are not on the earth or that the earth has in limited supplies.
What makes an asteroid or meteor so deadly is the speeds that it is traveling at, if put in an orbit the speeds would be decreased a ton. It would still harm where it landed but it wouldn't be nearly as bad.
This is going to happen, I don't like that it is done by china, but, I guess they are more future driven then we are. We seem to only care about wars, and care nothing else.
Good on them, at least someone is thinking outside the box.
Pred...edit on 31-8-2011 by predator0187 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kn0wh0w
reply to post by predator0187
what if the comet, in the long run, takes on a trajectory where it would eventually collide with earth?
i think we're messing with things we shouln't be messing with.
again, thats just me though.