reply to post by malcr
It is very easy to make numbers seem significant as somebody else pointed out we can add, subtract, divide, square, square root , drop the 3rd
signficiant digit etc etc and get the number we are looking for.
We must also be wary of using a unit of measure. It's not hard to create a unit of measure and make sure everything matches. Once you start this then
all sorts of "magical" numbers are created 3,4,5 pythagoran triangles. Perfect circles, square and geometry. So huge warning sign there.
There are other methods of arithmetic than the number base 10 (Decimal). There are also "binary", "octal", "hex", and those are just the common ones.
You can make a numerical (counting) system out of any randomly chosen value (letter, number, rhunes, whatever).
The fact that those who have measured using the metric system have found it to correspond with the CUBIT system indicates that MATH is MATH. It
doesn't matter what "base" you use, if the equations come out the same. Suppose whoever engineered the pyramids (and someone did! there's no question
about that!) used a base for mathematics that when calculated to what we call the speed of light, simply came out to their version of "1". The program
postulates that even the Egyptians inherited the site. Who knows if the "cubit" was the original measurement used? The accuracy of the architecture
certainly indicates a much tinier "unit" than we know of. Atomic even? Molecular?
While you make some good points, we must try to avoid being ethnocentric or academicentric, or whatever you want to call it. We don't know how in the
sam hill they did it. We could not do it now. That's the point. We COULD NOT do it now.
We have systems in place that are variant (Celsius, Farenheidt, Kelvin), and they each in their own way lead to equivalent points of physical states.
That's the beauty of math. It is correct, or is it incorrect. It is not the same as subjective arts/sciences. And no matter what base you use, or
symbolism (such as Pi and the Golden Number), the SAME ANSWERS are the ANSWERS, regardless of the method or symbols used to get there. If anything, it
is the ONE universal truth. In my opinion, anyway.
Also, the heiroglyphs in these very distant structures have YET to be decoded. Theosophy states that the keys are hidden in extremely remote,
inaccessible places, and that MOST of the copies ever made -- which were based on prehistoric oral tradition -- were systematically destroyed. They
would have ALL been destroyed except for the discretion and wisdom of those who were initiated and knew the key and knew how dangerous it would be in
the hands of the unaware/naive. The glyphs mean NOTHING to those without the key, just as the Mantras used in guru meditation, even though they might
be written down for someone, would do NOTHING without the proper vibration and tone.
And the video made a special point to "DISCREDIT" the "no wheel" theory. They indicated that a simple chisel and a rock were insufficient tools.
As for not including the structures NOT IN THE LINE, those might have been made by prior or later groups, eh?
Anyway, I'm only adding to your points, not trying to attack you personally. These thoughts just came to mind after I read your post. I'm glad you
made your last point, that you don't wave away the linear connection of the structures as shown. I believe it too!!
Yeah, we don't know when the 26,000 year cycle "began" or "ended" in our terms. No one said it would be "the end of the world". They implied, if I
recall correctly, that it was the end of a certain CYCLE. I have heard that with each cycle (we are the Fifth), the human race will become a little
more enlightened. Until then, the secrets will be kept SECRET.
I actually hope I'm around when it does happen, though!
edit on 1-9-2011 by wildtimes because: To remove remarks that seemed harsh. Sorry, everybody. SORRY
edit on 1-9-2011 by
wildtimes because: (no reason given)