It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We have the basis there for a political system that would be representative of the peoples will at all levels whilst offering financial and military security.
It is free from restrictive and dogmatic politcal ideaology and provides accountability whilst rewarding honesty and integrity.
It's an absolute no brainer in my eyes....but we all know it's just a pipedream.
Originally posted by sapien82
@everyone
You know , you lot are a bunch of smart people . and I think we could see eye to eye on most things . I say we do form a political party and we each delegate an area of britian , we first build our manifesto , I can do the graphic design needed for the promotional leaflets , palmflets, posters.
Originally posted by christina-66
Unlike them we have a far greater opportunity - courtesy of modern communication technology - to actually get something together for very little capital outlay. We've already had a volunteer for graphic design on this thread
Originally posted by Freeborn
As stu pointed out, I am strongly opposed to the very idea of political parties.
I think they limit free and individual thought, are restrictive and dogmatic, promote adherence to party line over personal conviction and generally detrimental to the democratic process.
Of course I recognise the urge and benefits of aligning oneself with people of a similar viewpoint, especially if real change is to be achieved.
It is quite the conundrum.
A movement or group aligned with one specific aim or goal, in this instance a change to direct democratic government as outlined, free from any political ideology or agenda maybe acceptable.
Hopefully it would attract support from a broad section of political beliefs.
Originally posted by Freeborn
I would probably support and offer advice etc, for what little it's worth, to such a group but would in no circumstances take any publicly prominent role...I have a full cemetery of skeletons in my closet.
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by christina-66
As stu pointed out, I am strongly opposed to the very idea of political parties.
I think they limit free and individual thought, are restrictive and dogmatic, promote adherence to party line over personal conviction and generally detrimental to the democratic process.
Of course I recognise the urge and benefits of aligning oneself with people of a similar viewpoint, especially if real change is to be achieved.
It is quite the conundrum.
A movement or group aligned with one specific aim or goal, in this instance a change to direct democratic government as outlined, free from any political ideology or agenda maybe acceptable.
Hopefully it would attract support from a broad section of political beliefs.
I would probably support and offer advice etc, for what little it's worth, to such a group but would in no circumstances take any publicly prominent role...I have a full cemetery of skeletons in my closet.
Originally posted by stumason
reply to post by Freeborn
well, I can tell you now I am up for it..
For too long we have whinged and whined on these boards, but we don't really do anything about it. I think the time has come to get off our arse and mobilise.
After all, if those pillocks in the EDL (and they are pillocks) can organise, then I am sure educated persons such as us can get going.
reply to post by christina-66
I think a non-partisan system is perfectly plausible with the direct democracy model. The requirement for allegiances would be greatly reduced because every major decision is in the hands of the citizenry.
Originally posted by EvanB
reply to post by christina-66
I think a non-partisan system is perfectly plausible with the direct democracy model. The requirement for allegiances would be greatly reduced because every major decision is in the hands of the citizenry.
It would also get the citizenry interested in their own country again and destroy the apathy with everyone having a stake.
Originally posted by stumason
Ok, so we're all in agreement (hope you were sat down for that)
What are we going to do about it?
(I feel like some 19th century ideological activist now - conspiring in a dark room somewhere to change the world )
Originally posted by stumason
Ok, so we're all in agreement (hope you were sat down for that)
What are we going to do about it?
(I feel like some 19th century ideological activist now - conspiring in a dark room somewhere to change the world )
Marketing
Talking as a marketing manager (had my own business), you have to research the market as it were. We have a bare bones manifesto but just because we see a percieved need not everyone sees it the same way so research adds meat to the bones and makes it universal.
So what do we call ourselves?