Originally posted by habfan1968
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by habfan1968
USC is not Berkeley.
USC is the University of Southern California.
Berkeley is the Unversity of Californa, Berkeley.
There is no "USC radio telescope".
Thanks for that, i do get a little confused with the letters from universities.
Is it possible the person that posted the video made a mistake? USC vs University of California? They have a sound clip, may have come from Elinen,
is there a chance they got the university mixed up?
edit on 30-8-2011 by habfan1968 because: (no reason given)
Sure there is.
They are Spanish as hear it, so it's very likely...and Phage would have well known this to be the most likely scenario with the UC and USC tit for
tat with Max, but rather than be contributory, and help to get to the bottom of this, Hoax or not, he decided do be ultra pedantic and issue very
short posts arguing the toss about USC or UC, rather than the thread topic as a whole.
Typically terse, and unhelpful as most debunkers are.
Just rubbish and discredit the source, argue about an extra 'S' for a hour or so, imply the Radio array is no longer in use to get folks to believe
it couldn't possibly be true, (even though SETI have the funding in place and it's *may* well have been up and running for testing and calibration
two weeks before it was estimated to be on line, and forget about what the actual thread really consists of.
Why? For what purpose?
If one truly believes this is a hoax, prove it or provide evidence honestly, not by slight of hand and word play.
If he/they can't be bothered, fair enough simply butt out of the thread.
I actually am thinking it probably is a hoax, but i won't argue for a few hours about UC or USC, i downloaded the file and have been using the time
to play around with it instead (not that i know what i'm doing)...why couldn't phage have done the same?
Because with the quantity of sycophants trailing in his/their wake, phage has gotten to the point where he posts his thing, and that about wraps it up
in many peoples minds...i'm encouraged to see not everyone takes what an anonymous member on an anonymous website forum has to say on a given subject
for absolute truth to be honest.
It's a shame the public don't question their politicians a little more intensely too, perhaps then they wouldn't be led down the garden path so
I am reading as i go, and not skipping ahead to the end of the thread, so if these points have been raised and answered, apologies in advance.