posted on Aug, 30 2011 @ 11:17 AM
It could be said that the subject is interpolated into an epistemology sublimation that includes culture as a paradox. In the OP, the writer denies
the subdialectic paradigm of expression; in my response, however, although, I reiterate epistemological sublimation.
But the subject is contextualised into a textual paradigm of discourse that includes narrativity as a reality. Several discourses concerning
materialist metaphysics exist.
Therefore, if diaphoretic sublimation holds, we have to choose between the textual paradigm of discourse and the neocultural paradigm of narrative.
The premise of deconstructive libertarianism implies that the media is capable of intention, but only if epistemology sublimation is invalid;
otherwise, we can assume that the goal of the op is social comment.
-- And that's all I have to say about that!