It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TupacShakur
reply to post by Misoir
I wonder what other tricks they have up their sleeves....
That's good stuff. I didn't get around to watching those yet, but I'll check them out because Alex Jones tells it like it is.
Like Alex Jones said their next attacks will probably be something like... "Ron Paul assassinated Lincoln" "he blew up the RMS Lucitania" and "Paul crucified Christ"
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Janky Red
So you think he is wrong simply because he has acted on his own constant beliefs over 30 years??
Is it not fair to say that he also gave 30 years of FAIR WARNING???
I can't believe this is even a debatable topic.
Kro, we've been over this before. Do I need to post the proof that he's being ignored again? Here.
All the republicans are being attacked. Heck hardball devoted half their show trying to discredit Perry but that's to be expected. I find it funny that people keep claiming he's being ignored yet always have some new video of negative remarks about him.
Kind of hard to keep producing new video of him if he is being ignored so much.
PEJ also looked specifically at the network morning andevening news programs, primetime cable news programs and Sunday morning shows on August 14 and 15. The results?
According to that analysis, Paul was mentioned just 29 times. By comparison, Perry was mentioned 371 times, Bachmann was mentioned 274 times, and Romney was mentioned 183 times.
Originally posted by Janky Red
I think there is a clear and cut case of conflict of interest for Paul. Not because I dislike him,
he is my favorite candidate, but because it is unreasonable to expect president Paul to
destroy his own portfolio.
The opposite is also true; Paul would benefit TREMENDOUSLY
from a complete crash of the dollar, his family would probably benefit greatly too. It is a
very legitimate thing to question IMO, it is an unfortunate bind to be in. If Paul's position wins
the day, the consequential truth is that hundreds of millions of Americans could very well
be destroyed in the natural resulting process. Could we not assume that Paul's inclination
would be too facilitate bettering his personal financial position?
Mis', do you think Paul could make decisions that could potentially wipe out his and families positions?
Do you think Paul would be immured from the desire to facilitate the "event" he claims is inevitable?