It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Imtor
The part with creators could be true only explained in Ancient Astronaut theory. There is some evidence that we did not evolve from those primitive animals at least not directly, without help. The link that I posted isn't talking about aliens at all, it adds errors in the DNA - mutations and viruses as a reason to become what we are. Still Darwin's theory can shut up.
And that is the only case 'creators' could be true, some other civilization, human or non-human that decided to call themselves Gods or creators and played God.
Religion fails here, as they take all literally ignoring the event of misinterpretation.
Anyway my opinion is, mixture of evolution, genetic engineering and mutations. Why not? All taken together?
And why I think there is some other civilization similar to us to make us what we are today - do you think that from UGLY ASTRALOPHITECUS or UGLY APES our fur would fall, we would become beatiful? Because through mutation or evolution turning into somethign beatiful HELLO?
We are beatiful that's right, compared to Greys, reptilians, animals we look beatiful? We look perfect. Can mutation and evolution perfect us so well? I think NOT. Thus the idea that we may be a separate species, partially, coming from someone else.
Give me a reason HOW evolution can make us so perfect in look, so clean and beatiful, so thinking compared to animals? I don't think so. Thus Ancient Aliens theory where ALIENS could be wrong and be simply another civilization - is the most plausible answer.edit on 30-8-2011 by Imtor because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SaturnFX
reply to post by undo
1) What is the heavenly host (host of heaven). This is one of those debates actually due to poor understanding of linguistics..some say it means stars, some say it is a army of ufos...
2) Stars don't necessarily mean stars...it translates to shining, and angels also fit the descriptions of shining ones...a ufo would also fit that description btw.
The passage you bring up is muddled in confusion more than anything...you got two things working against itself, first off, linguistic issues not really being clear of what they are describing...and again, cavemen trying to explain something far outside of their common understanding.
If you take it to celestial bodies, then yes, the case of black holes and such could be made, but what if they are discussing not stars, but simply ufo's, or something of the like...suddenly you are back to square one.
Check this out, you may find it interesting:
About the host of heaven
Originally posted by JAGx1981
reply to post by john_bmth
Whats logical about Aliens we have no physical proof of?
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by nenothtu
Just out of curiosity, who is this "we" you constantly referred to in that post? You got a mouse in your pocket?
i dunno why we people tend to use we when referring to things that other people agree with. but we do. when a person who believes science is the ultimate in truth confronts a person who thinks god is ultimate truth, they both end up saying we. the person for science says we to include his fellows who agree with a mainstream approach on the topic and the person for god says we to include his fellows who agree with a mainstream approach on the topic. political debate is the same. it's we we we all the way home
levity, we need some.
Originally posted by Believer101
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by Believer101
Desiring the removal of anything as influential as Christianity is simply ignorant. I would no more desire it's removal as Islam nor any thing else. It's done things for us. Weather you like that or not, well suck it up, we're the better a species because of it. Sure I'd like them to convert, but I would never grab a time machine and remove it from existence.
Influential? Really? The only thing Christianity influences is ignorant, hateful, spiteful people who think they're better than everyone else. We're a better species because of Christianity? You have GOT to be joking. Considering Christians are the most hateful people out there, who will KILL someone for being different, not believing in your precious "god", or for even being homosexual, NO. We are NOT a better species because of Christianity. We're a better species because more people are starting to wake up and see the truth in you people.
Originally posted by intrepid
reply to post by RevelationGeneration
I'm sure it just a simple oversight but would you address this please?
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by RevelationGeneration
How is that evidence???
You do realize chariots were transported BY BOAT all the time. And guess what, storm sunk ships back then...including ships with chariots on them. That's a much more logical explanation for the wheel than some magical creature "parting the sea". Why? Well, mostly because we've observed it happen in the past. We know for a FACT it happened.
So you would have to prove that this wheel ended up there because the sea were parted.
Somewhere in the Atlantic, there's a chess set deep down. But that doesn't mean someone parted the sea and whoever walked the route dropped a chess set...it means the Titanic sank and one of the things going over board was a chess set.
It's called LOGIC