It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Restaurant owner Gary Honeycutt says a push in California’s Legislature to ban the plastic foam containers he uses to serve up takeout meals could cost him thousands of dollars in an industry where profit margins are razor thin.
The bill by state Senator Alan Lowenthal, a Democrat, would prohibit restaurants, grocery stores, and other vendors from dispensing food in expanded polystyrene containers beginning in 2016. If signed into law, the measure would make California the first to institute a statewide ban on such containers.
I personally believe there are ways of encouraging changes like this through the free market rather than one more way for State or Federal Government to dictate what we do, eat, see, hear, wear or buy.
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
I personally believe there are ways of encouraging changes like this through the free market rather than one more way for State or Federal Government to dictate what we do, eat, see, hear, wear or buy.
I am not being sarcastic; what would you suggest? I was trying to think of a good way. I think having customers make the 'right' decision is probably asking a but much of our society if we really want to get things done. I agree with you, there is too much govt. control and micromanagement.
Originally posted by quango
I don't see why cardboard could not be used in place of foam.
Originally posted by quango
Also, why not find a way to reward customers who bring in their own plastic and tupperware containers to pick up to-go food.
Originally posted by zroth
They should address the real problems in that state before funding someone's green agenda.
Solve the unemployment problem then sell new containers to the employed.
Originally posted by IamJustanAmerican
reply to post by Wyn Hawks
Not true.
We are not running out of timber.
Originally posted by IamJustanAmerican
If you ever drive buy a housing development (if there is such a thing today)
Originally posted by Flyer
Originally posted by zroth
They should address the real problems in that state before funding someone's green agenda.
Solve the unemployment problem then sell new containers to the employed.
The 2 problems arent mutually exclusive.
They can try to do both.
Going by your logic, nothing should be done until world peace has been achieved.