It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Tea Party is Racist?

page: 4
4
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 30 2011 @ 12:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Southern Guardian

Wow, this comment morphed from something moderate to equating progressives to communist and fascist icons and murderers. Divide and conquer alright.

edit on 30-8-2011 by Southern Guardian because: (no reason given)



Quotes from America socialist leader Norman Thomas (1884 - 1968):

"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened."

************

"I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform."


There, my fellow Americans, is the progressive's blueprint and road map to bringing down this country. Many in the tea party realize how far along that path the progressives have come and want to stop them now before they complete the destruction of America.

So, if you try to see things from the tea party's point of view, saving the country is not something that can be compromised on, it has to start now.

Just like the progressive's view that their goal of destroying America is almost within reach, so they can't let up. Efforts must be redoubled. No room for compromise there either.




posted on Aug, 30 2011 @ 01:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by centurion1211

Originally posted by Southern Guardian

Wow, this comment morphed from something moderate to equating progressives to communist and fascist icons and murderers. Divide and conquer alright.

edit on 30-8-2011 by Southern Guardian because: (no reason given)



Quotes from America socialist leader Norman Thomas (1884 - 1968):

"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened."

************

"I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform."


There, my fellow Americans, is the progressive's blueprint and road map to bringing down this country. Many in the tea party realize how far along that path the progressives have come and want to stop them now before they complete the destruction of America.

So, if you try to see things from the tea party's point of view, saving the country is not something that can be compromised on, it has to start now.

Just like the progressive's view that their goal of destroying America is almost within reach, so they can't let up. Efforts must be redoubled. No room for compromise there either.





I have known about thjis template for many years now...that the Democratic party and particulary the Unions are adopting these policies and practices. They are also following the very socialist templates as is being done in England right now...and with the same social tragic events in mind.

England is currently ruining their budget and economy with social programs , give aways, and entitlements. They have crippled a whole generation of Young people on emotional train wreck entitlement policies and very destructive behaviors couched as entitlements.

I did not realize how bad it has become in England until I read the book

"Life at the bottom" The world view that makes the underclass.

by Theodore Dalrymple"

This is the very system that someone is attempting to overlay onto America. We know this as the "Dumbing Down " of the American peoples. We are not Englishmen here ..we are Americans...ie...Yanks.

They are attempting to sneak it in through the back door ..by various and mostly executive means and without the awareness of most Americans. It is the very system of thought and "Feelings " which is being promoted in our Public Schools and media. The World vVew and World Programs.

The Tea Party cannot succeed by working through either the 'Republicans nor the Democrats. They will ..in the end...find that they must exodus from this system and become self sufficient...very much like the Amish.

This must needs be done because of the very corruption and non represenative way this government now functions...they no loger represent America but only certain special interest groups and at very over inflated costs.

It is become clear to me that this current government would rather wage war on it's own peoples than lose power and control.
This government ..republican and democrat would both turn on the public rather than allow the public to think for themselves.

The Republicans are only Democrat Lite. Both parties will lie to and deceive the public on many things.

Hope this helps.

Orangetom



posted on Aug, 30 2011 @ 03:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by centurion1211

Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by Xen0m0rpH
 


I think racism is a major factor to why the tea parties have made such a political influence among the conservative population ...


Stop you right there.

Based on exactly what reputable sources or evidence?

"You think" somehow makes it a fact - as in a lie repeated often enough becomes a fact?


Where did I say this was absolute fact? When I said "I think", it implied that this was what I believed. No I don't evidence for closeted racists, they translate their issues with Obama into partisan and birtherist outbursts.

I'm sure you're not a racist centurion? Obama's black with an arabic middle name, so what, right? There's herman cain, one of the tea party candidates, I mean, he's black right? I'm sure you've got plenty of evidence to point to the fact that race has nothing to do with your anger.

Carry on.



posted on Aug, 30 2011 @ 03:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by centurion1211
Quotes from America socialist leader Norman Thomas (1884 - 1968):

"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened."

************

"I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform."


There, my fellow Americans, is the progressive's blueprint


I'm going to assume that you automatically equate the term socialism to communism, and by that, all progressives are communists. So that must me a communist right? I suppose I oppose any market freedom whatsoever, that I think everybody should get paid the same? You're accusing of this because I don't buy the free market fantasy from the rightwing? Rather low. It's a weak argument to label somebody as a communist or fascist the minute they disagree with you.

Progressives in general don't support communism, unless communism comes in the form of medicare and social security, and if that's where you're getting, hopefully those presidential hopefuls in the republican party will come in to save america and the elderly from communism.


Many in the tea party realize how far along that path the progressives have come and want to stop them now before they complete the destruction of America.


exactly what have the tea parties achieved over the last 3 years aside from them electing GOP freshman, most of whom voted to extend the patriot act and Israel military support? What else did they achieve aside from labelling everbody who didn't agree with them as communist sympathizers? I'd like to know, really.

Unless you'd have me believe the mysterious liberal elite lead by Goerge Soros is keeping them down? That's it right? Commies in the whitehouse. It's 1963 all over again.

If there's one there I can tell from your predictable post, it's that republican presidential hopefuls really have it easy these elections. Just act angry and yell out communism and the tea parties will eat it up like puppies.


So, if you try to see things from the tea party's point of view, saving the country


I nearly spilled me beer, I'm done here.

edit on 30-8-2011 by Southern Guardian because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 30 2011 @ 04:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Southern Guardian

I nearly spilled me beer, I'm done here.

edit on 30-8-2011 by Southern Guardian because: (no reason given)


Might want to save that beer (progressives drink beer?), or have something a lot stronger on hand for election night 2012 because your so-called "progressive" nanny state dreams will most likely be over.

Never forget that poll after poll shows that people identifying themselves as "liberals" make up only about 20% of the electorate, while conservatives have the highest percentage followed closely by independents. That means so-called "progressives" always need a lot of help from independents - and "other means" - to ever win a national election. Poll after poll also says you're not likely to get that this time around after so severely botching the economy.

So, gloat while you can ...




posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 02:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by centurion1211
Might want to save that beer (progressives drink beer?), or have something a lot stronger on hand for election night 2012 because your so-called "progressive" nanny state dreams


Obama's not looking all that popular in the polls, he's still hovering around 40% by most standards. However, I don't think the current band of republican candidates at the moment show much against overtaking Obama in 2012. I'm sure you disagree though, I mean you've got Fox news, drudge, free republic, alex jones and all those other conservative outlets to tell you otherwise.

It's still early days though, given the conservative base and their innovativeness during the election period, there may verywell be a republican golden boy or golden event waiting to push Obama aside. Anything is possible, it just doesn't look as though republicans are gathering any convincing candidates. When I look at the republican portion of congress, they don't appear to be all that confident.


Never forget that poll after poll shows that people identifying themselves as "liberals" make up only about 20% of the electorate, while conservatives have the highest percentage followed closely by independents.


That is very true. In actual fact, the idea that hispanics and african americans tend to be liberal for the most part is nonsense. I've found that most minorities actually tend to be conservative. Americans in general tend to be conservative but that being said, only a fraction of americans are conservative to the point of promoting free market policies and extreme social policies such as forcing raped woman to bear pregnancy. Most americans, while conservatives, are moderately conservative. The brand of tea party does not appeal to most americans and it never has. Reagan tried to bring in similar policies that would virtually transform america to what the tea parties advocate now, he never got far. Reagan was a staunch opponent of medicare, but he never touched it. Nixon can be applied to in the same light. George H Bush? If anything he was quiet the centrist and actually raised taxes in part of his presidency, reagan did prior as well. Dubya? Well you all all about him. But hey? Who am I to convince you?



posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 11:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by Southern Guardian

It's still early days though, given the conservative base and their innovativeness during the election period, there may verywell be a republican golden boy or golden event waiting to push Obama aside. Anything is possible, it just doesn't look as though republicans are gathering any convincing candidates. When I look at the republican portion of congress, they don't appear to be all that confident.



Rick Perry is the GOP Nominee. He has been annointed.

The Koch brothers called him like a hunting dog and he came. Right in the middle of a special legislative session that he himself had called for.




The Statesman reported that Rick Perry, in the middle of the special legislative session he called, flew off to Vail, Colorado, on a donor's private airplane to a summit hosted by the Koch Brothers. Rick Perry is no stranger to meeting with conservative billionaires to plan how to enact corporate-friendly policies at the expense of Texan families, and it's for this reason that he could be the preferred presidential candidate for the Koch Brothers.

www.dailykos.com...

Good dog


Two weeks later he was singing the Kochs favorite song in public....



Rick Perry suggests global warming is a hoax
www.cbsnews.com...

Good dog
edit on 31-8-2011 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)

edit on 31-8-2011 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 02:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Indigo5

Originally posted by Southern Guardian

It's still early days though, given the conservative base and their innovativeness during the election period, there may verywell be a republican golden boy or golden event waiting to push Obama aside. Anything is possible, it just doesn't look as though republicans are gathering any convincing candidates. When I look at the republican portion of congress, they don't appear to be all that confident.



Rick Perry is the GOP Nominee. He has been annointed.

The Koch brothers called him like a hunting dog and he came. Right in the middle of a special legislative session that he himself had called for.




The Statesman reported that Rick Perry, in the middle of the special legislative session he called, flew off to Vail, Colorado, on a donor's private airplane to a summit hosted by the Koch Brothers. Rick Perry is no stranger to meeting with conservative billionaires to plan how to enact corporate-friendly policies at the expense of Texan families, and it's for this reason that he could be the preferred presidential candidate for the Koch Brothers.

www.dailykos.com...

Good dog


Two weeks later he was singing the Kochs favorite song in public....



Rick Perry suggests global warming is a hoax
www.cbsnews.com...

Good dog
edit on 31-8-2011 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)

edit on 31-8-2011 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)


Hating Fox News while happy to quote the DailyKos?

There's a great example of hypocrisy (by the left) in action.

Sit. Lie down. Speak - on second thought ...




posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 02:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Southern Guardian

Originally posted by centurion1211
Might want to save that beer (progressives drink beer?), or have something a lot stronger on hand for election night 2012 because your so-called "progressive" nanny state dreams


Obama's not looking all that popular in the polls, he's still hovering around 40% by most standards. However, I don't think the current band of republican candidates at the moment show much against overtaking Obama in 2012. I'm sure you disagree though, I mean you've got Fox news, drudge, free republic, alex jones and all those other conservative outlets to tell you otherwise.

It's still early days though, given the conservative base and their innovativeness during the election period, there may verywell be a republican golden boy or golden event waiting to push Obama aside. Anything is possible, it just doesn't look as though republicans are gathering any convincing candidates. When I look at the republican portion of congress, they don't appear to be all that confident.


Never forget that poll after poll shows that people identifying themselves as "liberals" make up only about 20% of the electorate, while conservatives have the highest percentage followed closely by independents.


That is very true. In actual fact, the idea that hispanics and african americans tend to be liberal for the most part is nonsense. I've found that most minorities actually tend to be conservative. Americans in general tend to be conservative but that being said, only a fraction of americans are conservative to the point of promoting free market policies and extreme social policies such as forcing raped woman to bear pregnancy. Most americans, while conservatives, are moderately conservative. The brand of tea party does not appeal to most americans and it never has. Reagan tried to bring in similar policies that would virtually transform america to what the tea parties advocate now, he never got far. Reagan was a staunch opponent of medicare, but he never touched it. Nixon can be applied to in the same light. George H Bush? If anything he was quiet the centrist and actually raised taxes in part of his presidency, reagan did prior as well. Dubya? Well you all all about him. But hey? Who am I to convince you?


Careful. Purposely saying things you know to be false (trying to be nice here) can get to be a "bad habit".

I've said in post after post that while I did originally support Bush , that changed for a number of reasons during his 2nd term and I have been quite critical of his policies. I'm sure you know that, but still you post otherwise using the democrat manifesto of "a lie told often enough becomes the truth".

The only "support" I've really given Bush and other Republicans like Palin since that time was to post against the use of slurs and caricatures and attacks on their families.



posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 02:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by centurion1211

Originally posted by Indigo5



The Statesman reported




Hating Fox News while happy to quote the DailyKos?

There's a great example of hypocrisy (by the left) in action.

Sit. Lie down. Speak - on second thought ...





Since reading comprehension doesn't seem to be your strong suite..

The original story was written by Rick Perry's Homestate Paper




The Statesman reported


www.statesman.com...

Or maybe you would prefer Politico?

Rick Perry attended Koch brothers bash
www.politico.com...

Or any other of the 100's of sources?....

Did you know that the Gov. of Florida (Scott) also ran like a good pet to the Koch "Summit" at the same time? and refused to say where he dissapeared to for days?

It's not like either Perry or Scott denied it....once the media was able to prove it.

Cue the "na na na na - I can't hear you"...just don't actually read or research.

Good dog


edit on 31-8-2011 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)

edit on 31-8-2011 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 06:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Indigo5

Originally posted by centurion1211

Originally posted by Indigo5



The Statesman reported




Hating Fox News while happy to quote the DailyKos?

There's a great example of hypocrisy (by the left) in action.

Sit. Lie down. Speak - on second thought ...





Since reading comprehension doesn't seem to be your strong suite..

The original story was written by Rick Perry's Homestate Paper




The Statesman reported


www.statesman.com...

Or maybe you would prefer Politico?

Rick Perry attended Koch brothers bash
www.politico.com...

Or any other of the 100's of sources?....

Did you know that the Gov. of Florida (Scott) also ran like a good pet to the Koch "Summit" at the same time? and refused to say where he dissapeared to for days?

It's not like either Perry or Scott denied it....once the media was able to prove it.

Cue the "na na na na - I can't hear you"...just don't actually read or research.

Good dog


edit on 31-8-2011 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)

edit on 31-8-2011 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)


The DailyKos ...

Is quite capable and often guilty of CHERRY-PICKING the news to suit its readers.

Quite possibly no one denied anything because there was nothing OF SUBSTANCE to deny.

Keep the insults coming ...




posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 08:06 PM
link   
reply to post by Southern Guardian
 


Socialism is a bridge to communism. Even the Communist Party websites say it. Marx said it. Fabian Socialism says it.



posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 08:12 PM
link   
It's really funny watching Progressives freak out about the Koch brothers when most of the Progressive movement today is bankrolled by George Soros.
How did Obama get elected? Any guesses? It's certain that Soros funded Obama's campaign and funds MoveOn.org.
What's the problem here?



posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 10:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Southern Guardian
 


Socialism is a bridge to communism.


And how do you define socialism exactly?



posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 11:06 PM
link   
WHOOOOOO!!!! Back after a hiatus, The Killah 29 has returned! *Cheering*
Now for my post.

Racist? Not really. Morons? Yes. Most of the Tea Partiers have no f-ing idea what the f*** they are talking about and are just making a big b****ing storm. And it's become very annoying.



posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 11:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by The Killah29
WHOOOOOO!!!! Back after a hiatus, The Killah 29 has returned! *Cheering*
Now for my post.

Racist? Not really. Morons? Yes. Most of the Tea Partiers have no f-ing idea what the f*** they are talking about and are just making a big b****ing storm. And it's become very annoying.

You returned for THAT little gem?
*yawn*
If you're annoyed now, I can't imagine how irritated you'll be next year!



posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 11:16 PM
link   
reply to post by centurion1211
 


Excellent commentary my friend. I love your posts.



posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 11:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
It's really funny watching Progressives freak out about the Koch brothers when most of the Progressive movement today is bankrolled by George Soros.
How did Obama get elected? Any guesses? It's certain that Soros funded Obama's campaign and funds MoveOn.org.
What's the problem here?


There is a no problem.

You've pointed out perfectly to those who are caught up in this nonsense exactly how this sick game is played.

Both sides are being played against each other for the greater good of a select few.



posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 11:26 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


Oh lordy. XD And no i didn't come back just for that. It's just my first post since I came back



posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 11:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Southern Guardian

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Southern Guardian
 


Socialism is a bridge to communism.


And how do you define socialism exactly?



Must I really?

I can just make it really short and go with the Merriam Webster definition


any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

a system of society or group living in which there is no private property

a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done


www.merriam-webster.com...


Or I could go with say, oh what Karl Marx and Lenin have to say about it, which I have posted on another thread here about the Tea Party


Heres a source I went with on the other thread. Engels on Socialism

www.marxists.org...


edit on 31-8-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
4
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join