It goes without saying that I hope we can keep this thread free of hate. Emotional, or hateful responses to the subject of race are exactly what has
kept it taboo. And in being taboo, an underbelly of anger has quietly grown, ready to explode in the coming years.
A recent article in the Daily Telegraph -
Witnessing the live birth of gangland
In 2010, a quarter of births were to mothers born outside the UK, according to the ONS.
And that as a result...
we’re experiencing the biggest change in our demographic identity since the Anglo-Saxon invasions of the fifth century.
The common response of the pro-multicultural 'Liberal left' (argument (1)
for the sake of this thread) is that Britain "has always been a
nation of immigrants". Like the Nazis, this is a lie that extremists like to repeat in the hope that the less-educated will be taken in by it.
However, England as a nation came into existence with
the arrival of the Anglo-Saxons (and related tribes). As the Telegraph article points
(though I would argue that 'Great Britain' is not in itself a nation but rather a collection of nations founded by slightly different peoples at
Nothing like this has happened before. Please pay no attention next time a Left-wing historian pops up on TV to romanticise the arrival of the
Normans, Huguenots, Eastern European Jews etc. These were significant influxes, but Great Britain has never been “a nation of immigrants”.
The other two regular responses of the 'Liberal left', if they even admit the truth that England is not a nation of immigrants, are that:
This is scaremongering. Britain has a healthy minority of immigrants that will never end up replacing the indigenous folk.
That this is a good thing - the land and culture do not belong to the founding ethnic group(s).
However, argument (2)
is brought into disrepute by the revelation that...
...within a few years, a quarter of young Britons will be black, Asian or of mixed race. In the capital, the total will be well over 50 per
is really what this thread is about, for the evidence now shows arguments (1)
to be well-and-truly
discredited. So all we are really left with is the debate as to whether race-replacement is acceptable or not. It is well under way now in England and
several European countries who since ancient-times have been comprised of European peoples. It is not over-exaggerating the situation to predict that
in England, in just a few decades, the ethnic English are going to be a minority. Some extremists may claim that we deserve it for the misdemeanours
of the British Empire. But even if we do deserve some kind of recompense (for the record, I believe not) then is the theft of the English peoples'
homeland a reasonable price to pay?
The ironic thing is that many 'Liberal left' extremists would say that predominantly European peoples stole the Native American and Australian's
homeland. I agree, and would not have been among those invaders who drove the natives to the edge of extinction. But where many would say those
natives had every right to fight back (some even saying they still have a right to fight back now), they would scream bloody murder if a white
European stood at his/her own border with a shotgun locked and loaded.
This isn't about hatred or superiority. It is purely and simply to do with the rights of each ethnic group in the world to survive. The English are
coming into an era where we are in a fight for our very survival. Multiculturalists aren't true multiculturalists - I am! I want a world where every
beautiful ancient culture, from the Dogon of Africa to the Sami of Lapland; the Aborigines of Australia to the Cherokee of America, is preserved and
allowed its own space to thrive. Multiculturalists want a world where each of those cultures exists multiple times within multiple Continents, only in
a watered-down version that is adapted to the Consumerist, 'Liberal' trappings of the modern, technological Western World.
It's not right!