US official: Al-Qaida's No. 2 killed in Pakistan , page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 27-8-2011 @ 12:55 PM by TrowaBarton

US official: Al-Qaida's No. 2 killed in Pakistan


www.msnbc.msn.com
WASHINGTON — Al-Qaida's second-in-command, Atiyah Abd al-Rahman, has been killed in Pakistan, delivering another big blow to a terrorist group that the U.S. believes to be on the verge of defeat, a senior Obama administration official said Saturday.


The Libyan national who was the network's former operational leader rose to al-Qaida's No. 2 spot after the U.S. killed al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden during a raid on his Pakistan compound in May.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said last month that al-Qaida's defeat was within reach if the U.S. could mount a string of successful attacks on the group's weakened leadership.
(visit the link for the full news article)

edit on 27/8/11 by TrowaBarton because: To add content.



reply posted on 27-8-2011 @ 01:24 PM by Praetorius
reply to post by ALF88

Looks like they are speeding up the - Get Rid Of The Terrorist Threat Agenda - for ten years they didn't manage to get anybody and now they do it within months.

How stupid do they think we are?


Eh...pretty stupid, but for pretty much the opposite reason. I'd assume there are likely threads here on ATS compiling how many high-level al qaeda fighters/leaders have supposedly been killed MULTIPLE TIMES (seriously, the guys are like cats, with their fancy 9 lives) according to various news reports covering their deaths...time and time again. We've apparently been very successful in killing them, but seriously, it's like the blasted Night of the Living Terrorists or something over there...I'm sure we'll hear about this guy being killed again in a couple of years.


reply posted on 27-8-2011 @ 01:27 PM by Cobaltic1978
reply to post by ALF88



They will continue to drip feed us news like this until we are led to believe that the threat of terrorism is on the wane. Don't worry people we are winning this. I remember reading a column around 2003 saying that the war on terror could last 50 - 60 years.

You know what the next threat will be though if some sources are to be believed? Alien Invasion.

Now that really would bring their NWO plans up several gears.


reply posted on 27-8-2011 @ 02:50 PM by pthena
reply to post by TrowaBarton

However I will ask this query in the meantime, If al - qaeda is defeated than who will be the new "boogeymen?"

Individual boogeymen become insignificant once world war is achieved. The time has already passed when thinking of coming world war, because we are already in it.

The area of conflict is already large enough: Libya, Somalia, Egypt(sinai), Iraq, Sudan, Nigeria, Yemen, Syria, Turkey, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran.

Japan has been kept unstable (6 Prime Ministers in 5 years) over US refusal to relocate bases from Okinawa. US demand for Syrian pres to "step down". US unilateral declaration of South Ossetia and Abkhazia as part of Georgia and ordering Russian forces to leave. New noises about Venezuela.

We are in it. World War. And this time the US is the aggressor, not Germany or Japan.

edit on 27-8-2011 by pthena because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 27-8-2011 @ 02:53 PM by mr-lizard
reply to post by TrowaBarton



How many number 2's is that now?

Atiyah Abd al-Rahman

Ayman Mohammed Rabie al-Zawahiri (he died twice if I remember correctly)

Sheik Abd-Al-Rahman

Abdul Ghani.

Ilyas Kashmiri

They were all regarded as 2nd highest Al-Queda at one point.


Anyone notice how this guy was a Libyan? Makes you wonder eh?

en.wikipedia.org...

Apparently this is the group he was involved in,.
edit on 27-8-2011 by mr-lizard because: (no reason given)


And - according to Wikipedia

LIFG was founded in 1995 by Libyans who had fought against Soviet forces in Afghanistan. It aims to establish an Islamic state in Libya and views the current regime as oppressive, corrupt and anti-Muslim, according to the Canadian Security Intelligence Service. LIFG claimed responsibility for a failed assassination attempt against Gaddafi in February 1996, which was in part funded by MI6 according to David Shayler, and engaged Libyan security forces in armed clashes during the mid-to-late 1990s.[4] They continue to target Libyan interests and may engage in sporadic clashes with Libyan security forces.[5]




edit on 27-8-2011 by mr-lizard because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 27-8-2011 @ 03:21 PM by pthena
reply to post by mr-lizard
British connection:

Britain's SAS leads hunt for Gaddafi
For the first time, defence sources have confirmed the SAS has been in Libya for several weeks, and played a key role in co-ordinating the battle for Tripoli.

With most of the capital in rebel hands, the SAS soldiers, who have been dressed in Arab civilian clothes and carrying the same weapons as the rebels, have been ordered to switch their focus to the search for Gaddafi.

Say, aren't there Geneva Conventions against military fighting as civilians. Isn't that who the US likes to lock up as terrorists at Guantanemo?


reply posted on 27-8-2011 @ 10:47 PM by caladonea
reply to post by TrowaBarton



Another terrorist is dead.....I really don't feel bad about that...but..I do question the timing of it all.


reply posted on 28-8-2011 @ 11:29 AM by John_Rodger_Cornman
Originally posted by TrowaBarton

US official: Al-Qaida's No. 2 killed in Pakistan


www.msnbc.msn.com
WASHINGTON — Al-Qaida's second-in-command, Atiyah Abd al-Rahman, has been killed in Pakistan, delivering another big blow to a terrorist group that the U.S. believes to be on the verge of defeat, a senior Obama administration official said Saturday.


The Libyan national who was the network's former operational leader rose to al-Qaida's No. 2 spot after the U.S. killed al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden during a raid on his Pakistan compound in May.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said last month that al-Qaida's defeat was within reach if the U.S. could mount a string of successful attacks on the group's weakened leadership.
(visit the link for the full news article)

edit on 27/8/11 by TrowaBarton because: To add content.


That's good what are they going to do about the ones on wallstreet?

Yeah. exactly. Pretty much nothing.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^