UK troops in Afghanistan friendly fire 19 times., page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 27-8-2011 @ 07:09 AM by Paulioetc15

UK troops in Afghanistan


www.bbc.co.uk
Four of the so-called friendly-fire incidents resulted in casualties, although none fatal, it was disclosed after a Freedom of Information request.

Between January 2008 and June 2009, Afghan personnel came under friendly-fire by UK troops at least 10 times.

Also, 21 Afghan interpreters for UK forces have been killed since 2006.

British forces mistakenly firing at Afghan soldiers, police and security service officials, resulted in seven deaths.

The most serious incident in the Lashkar Gah dis.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.thefrontierpost.com

Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
War On Terrorism
Military Projects
Middle East Issues
edit on 27-8-2011 by Paulioetc15 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 27-8-2011 @ 11:39 AM by stumason
reply to post by Viking9019



Indeed, but they should be PID'ing their targets. Those are the ROE and are strictly adhered too, sometimes to the point where if they cannot see the target who is firing, then under no circumstances can they fire back and they end up having to withdraw. It's all an effort to minimise firendly and civilian casualties.

Which begs the question, if they did PID them, that means that they were being shot at themselves by the Afghans who got shot back.


reply posted on 27-8-2011 @ 02:00 PM by Paulioetc15
reply to post by stumason



Well all the training and all is going to take some time. I believe that friendly fire among Americans is the highest but probably.


reply posted on 28-8-2011 @ 03:31 AM by DaveNorris
Originally posted by Paulioetc15
reply to
post by stumason



Well all the training and all is going to take some time. I believe that friendly fire among Americans is the highest but probably.


huh?


reply posted on 28-8-2011 @ 03:43 AM by Paulioetc15
reply to post by DaveNorris



What are you talking about? All i'm saying better training would be good.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^