Should oppose autocratic, now should avoid war

China, Russia, India, Syria, Lybia, all need to wood up and just bomb everyone......i would of a long time ago..

Was Libya a fiasco as the OP states? It was only a fiasco if you wanted the prize nut-job Gaddafi and his autocratic and repressive apparatus to stay in power. Otherwise Libya looks like being a success, albeit with short-term complications in getting stability and progress. We should hope that Libya is able to flourish as a nation unencumbered by the type of government that is self serving and autocratic.

The problem China and Russia have is that in condemning autocratic regimes who brutally repress, they are (er) condemning themselves, where both governments (especially China) have demonstrated (and currently demonstrate) serious repression. To condemn the actions in Syria is to condemn themselves. Tiananmen Square is still a fresh memory and the ruling Chinese autocrats have demonstrated that the life of a Chinese is pretty cheap when they are threatened. Does anyone here really thing that the Chinese Communist Party would willingly hand over power to the people when / if this is demanded?

In the blue corner we have the liberal democracies which condemn human rights violations and repression. In the red corner we have the nations who are the part of the problem.

Regards

Vladimir Putin, what a joke. He flexes his muscles in a pillowed room full of strippers. Ooo look at how manly he is. What a little girl.

Doesnt matter if Russia and China oppose it. They have opposed many resolutions and the West will do what they always do and that is they will act outside the UN. They just try this route first. No brainer. No news.

The key to the syrian thing is turkey, who has up till know
been a supporter of the curent batch of dirt bags. if anyone can lagitimatly
put boots on the ground in syria it's turkey claim humanitarism
and stamp the old gard out, giving turkey more sway in syria.
no one will put up a fuss if it's turkey