It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by XplanetX
Please excuse me for butting in Bogomil.
There is a book called "Is there a God". It is written from a christian perspective rather than a secular perspective. If you can stomach reading a book written by a christian concerning the 'science' contained within the bible then I highly reccomend it. If you would prefer not to read the whole book then you can click the link, press ctrl f and search for 'flat earth'. It will take you to the section concerning the bibles record of the earth and it's physical attributes.
Here is a link:
www.greatcommission.com...
I hope that helps.
Isaiah 40:22 He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in.
Originally posted by racasan
reply to post by XplanetX
1 - its say circle and not sphere or ball or round
2 – the passage gives us two bits of information – circle and
“heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in”
The only real conclusion is Isaiah thinks the world is flat
If we lived in some odd universe where sceptics where defending the flat earth theory and using a bit of text like Isaiah 40:22, you would have no problem in seeing they are wrong and that circle ball
I think what’s happening is you know the world is a sphere and you believe what the bible says is true so if these things come into conflict you have a problem, you must cut in some kind of mental blinkers in an effort to make the conflict go away
But remember sceptics don’t have your world view and so can read exactly what the text says – and what Isaiah 40:22 says is the world is flat
One more thing, if the word has 3 meanings then it could mean anything, if it could mean anything then it really means nothing
edit: i dropped חוג into google images and got:
www.google.co.uk...,or.r_gc.r_pw.&biw=1728&bih=833&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=o g&sa=N&tab=wi
so some kind of ring?
edit on 26-8-2011 by racasan because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by racasan
reply to post by XplanetX
Ok so it can be easily translated to sphere – accurate translation or not – so what about the “heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in” – I guess that actually reads as 15 billion light year wide space time event if you read it in ancient Hebrew
Re-read Isaiah 40:22 and ask yourself “if I where a sceptic could I read this as it saying Isaiah thought the world was flat?”
Or
Putting to one side the ancient Hebrew thing, is "flat earth" a reasonable thing to get from the text?
Originally posted by XplanetX
Given that we know today that the world is definitely a sphere, albeit not a perfect sphere. If the bible is indeed the inspired word of God then we should take the default position that the translation should definitely be 'sphere' not circle. If you can find something in the bible that definitively suggest's that the world is flat then I am all ears.
Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by XplanetX
You wrote:
["JOB 26:7 He spreads out the northern skies over empty space;
he suspends the earth over nothing.
An invisible force that we call gravity today."]
Did the similarity of the words 'nothing' and 'invisible' lead to to one of those christian-'logic' conclusions of things being identical, because they semantically can be put on a VERY broad common category?
In REAL logic, this is called a false inductive argument. But don't worry, it's mainly critics of christian missioning who care about logic, so no souls will be lost.
PS The real cosmological situation is ofcourse as everybody (i.e. all the right kind of believers) know, that the earth IS flat, and that it rests on the top of a never-ending regression of turtles. Some people believe it to be a sphere, because this disc sags somewhat at the edges, creating an illusion of being a sphere.
Originally posted by Blue_Jay33
People who argue that the bible says "this" and argue the point, but don't even believe in the bible amaze me. They build these super easy straw-men arguments shoot them down and proclaim themselves the victor, everybody else is stupid, and they are the smart ones. I guess it strokes their ego to do that.
My favorite one, is they say the Sun was created after the earth, even after vegetation was on the earth, totally ignoring science and context.
Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by XplanetX
You wrote:
["You are arguing semantics."]
Yes, I AM arguing semantics. I'm also arguing twisted logic. But that is already clear in my former post. If you want to follow this direction, please present a rational reasoning chain of how a biblical 'nothing' is a scientific gravity.
Originally posted by XplanetX
Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by XplanetX
You wrote:
["You are arguing semantics."]
Yes, I AM arguing semantics. I'm also arguing twisted logic. But that is already clear in my former post. If you want to follow this direction, please present a rational reasoning chain of how a biblical 'nothing' is a scientific gravity.
I have better things to do than argue semantics.
Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by The GUT
Quote: [" It is a pretty good stumper that consciousness issue, eh? It throws a legitimate bump in the road for materialists."]
Such smart 'tactics' could backlash, if it turns out, that it's just maneuvers without competence behind. Re-inforcing the impression of the christianities as a bunch of empty talkers and semanticists without a clue of what they are talking about.
In 1976 Professor Dean Kenyon repudiated the conclusion of his own evolutionary University textbook Biochemical Predestination (1969) which he had co-authored with Gary Steinman. His intensive research of amino acids and DNA caused him to reject Darwin's theory and accept Intelligent Design.
Then, in 1985, the atheist, Dr. Allan Rex Sandage, regarded as the greatest observational cosmologist in the world, told an American conference on science and religion that he had become a Christian, declaring:
"It was my science that drove me to the conclusion that the world is much more complicated than can be explained by science ... It was only through the supernatural that I can understand the mystery of existence ... Many scientists are now driven to faith by their very work."
theevolutioncrisis.org.uk...
WHAT science? WHAT context? And may I also include standard logic into the situation.