You can now see NIBIRU!

page: 7
17
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join

posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 05:18 AM
link   
ATS Went full blown retard a long while ago..

It's just taking most of the comunity a while to realise it.

We're headding right to another GLP

Just thank the Galactic Federation of Light, Niburu and Comet Elnin...


Actually, I think we can seriousely thank the GFL, because a lot of the real kooks started to arrive here around the time of Blossom Goochild. I suppose many of then just stayed around after that big fail..lol
edit on 8/26/2011 by Ironclad because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 05:52 AM
link   
I normally stay well away from these threads but this has hit the main page so I must add my two cents.

People please wake the Frigg up, the world we live on now has many very real problems that don’t require Google or a telescope to see.

Every day 35 000-50 000 children die from hunger, disease and war.

Yet these threads get ignored and Niburu threads hit the main page?

Deny ignorance is our motto, isnt it?

I come back from work to see these things and I can’t help but face palm myself........

This is most likely the only time you will see me on one of these threads.

For anyone who is interested in real world problems and finding solutions to those problems thats where I’ll be.


Peace.



Spike Spiegel
edit on 063131p://am3134 by Spike Spiegle because: grammar



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 05:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Spike Spiegle
 


I think ATS has become overwhelmed by teens and pre-teens. And exciteable and gulible over topics we know are often pointless and baseless.



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 05:58 AM
link   
reply to post by ShadowMonk
 


yeah what is that ive seen this before reminds me of the wavelength of fear please show the pic to others, I thought it was me being silly and it was just water mark under image



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 06:20 AM
link   
reply to post by mugger
 


"than our closest known star" which I'm assuming they mean...our sun? so, regular telescopes, might not see them? and it might be closer to us then our closest known star, but even Nasa, can't find it right now? BUT BUT..wait..we have all these astronomers..all over earth...looking out their windows, star gazing....surely they would see something before NASA.



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 06:48 AM
link   
Nibiru last appeared in our skies as the Star of Bethlehem and is not due in this vicinity for another 1600 yrs so it's probably something else.



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 06:48 AM
link   
I think your pretty spot on there, but you know what, i posted a thread about a proffesor who described in detail about nibiru and this infrared picture is exactly what he provided, yet i had debunkers putting me down left and right! im assuming the other object to the left of it might be elenin? or something else? just curious, if you go to my profile and find a topic i posted about nirbiru you can read the link i provided on the proffesor and his details, the page is laid out with many blank spaces in it so you have to do some scrolling but it was a excelent read1 verry thougher and scientificaly in depth
id like to see this be debunked, the fact the color in infrared is verry dark blue and green shows it is cold like a dwarf star and i think the green is either its colder tempreture or radiation, its area of infuence is massive!



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 06:51 AM
link   
reply to post by Tahnya86
 



i posted a thread about a proffesor who described in detail about nibiru and this infrared picture is exactly what he provided, yet i had debunkers putting me down left and right!


What makes you think the author of that ridiculous essay was a professor? He didn't even know that density equals mass divided by volume!



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 07:15 AM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 


that arguement aside he still provided a verry good timeline and scientific detail on its charicteristics, you cant just dismiss something completly because of a discrepencey, you have to match up resorces to get a more affirmed and sure.



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 07:17 AM
link   
I'm trying to wrap my head around the thought process of someone who screams, "Nibiru!" and is then shown endless links explaining that the image in question is a known celestial object. These posts are of course ignored, or worse written off as "debunkers" (as if debunking nonsense is a bad thing). Please unwed yourself from these unsubstantiated ideas. Learn something. Expand your mind. I can only take so much ignoring of facts before my head starts to throb.



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 07:24 AM
link   


Zoomed image, at the coordinates of the "blue/green" image. Brown Dwarf maybe?!
edit on 26-8-2011 by SonOfKal because: image?!



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 07:26 AM
link   
reply to post by Tahnya86
 



that arguement aside he still provided a verry good timeline and scientific detail on its charicteristics, you cant just dismiss something completly because of a discrepencey, you have to match up resorces to get a more affirmed and sure.


A timeline is not "good" if it is false. "Scientific detail" implies that science was done. It was not. A scientist would explain how the measurements were taken. How did this guy determine the mass? Usually, a planet's mass is calculated by observing the periods of its moons and using Newton's laws of gravity to calculate it. Unfortunately, the author does not believe in gravity, so how did he determine its mass? All of the figures he quotes are clearly just made up. Just because someone says something that sounds scientific doesn't mean that it's science.



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 07:41 AM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 


well verry well said points butt the professor aside, i have found the dwarf on google sky and microsoft worldwide telescope, if you use co ordinates : 09h 47m 59s 13' 15, 23 and use IRIS on Microsoft world wide telescope and infrared on google.com.sky you will find they both have the cold dwarf, if you know you infrared scale you can match up the scientific fact of what a cold dwarf stars tempreture would be on the infrared scale.



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 07:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by SonOfKal



Zoomed image, at the coordinates of the "blue/green" image. Brown Dwarf maybe?!
edit on 26-8-2011 by SonOfKal because: image?!



i hope you're not serious ....



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 07:50 AM
link   
reply to post by Angelicdefender2012
 

I can see your point.
But, then again, that doesn't exist either.



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 08:08 AM
link   
reply to post by domtron
 


There's so much wrong in this post I don't know where to begin. The Planet X hypothesis was around long before 1925. It started with the discovery of Neptune. The name Planet X became used in the first decade of the 20th century when Percivall Lowell coined it. The search ended in 1989 when Voyager 2 flew by Neptune and recalculated it mass. This new mass then explained the perturbations in the orbits of the gas giants.

Now on to the IRAS survey. The IRAS survey was completed in 1983 and the study you are referring to was performed that same year. In December 1983 the Washington Post published an article summarizing the study. Unfortunately, they did a poor job at this and sensationalized the findings. When the actual journal article was published it painted a very different picture. First, there were actually two unknown objects found in the IRAS data, and a few of these had the possibility of a being a celestial companion among numerous other possibilities. In 1985 a new journal article was published that identified nine of these objects as young, ultra-luminous, distant galaxies. The final object was identified as an infrared cirrus in 1987.

This brings us to WISE. While WISE has found many interesting things in our galactic neighborhood, it has found no new planets or stars in our solar system. What you are trying to express here is Tyche hypothesis. This states that there could be a planet 25,000 AU away that could explain the orbits of long-period comets. It would never come closer than 25,000 AU. Of course all of this is moot as it has not been found. As I said this is a hypothesis that has yet been proven. If Tyche exists it could be found in the WISE data, however nothing has indicated its existence to this date.

For your claims about the Sumerians, I'll just let Michael Heiser correct those mistakes for you.
Sitchin Is Wrong



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 08:10 AM
link   
reply to post by Tahnya86
 


Did you miss this entire thread? We've been talking about that very object. It has been identified as CW Leonis a carbon star that is 450 LY away.



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 08:29 AM
link   
edit on 26-8-2011 by Luke2089 because: wrong
edit on 26-8-2011 by Luke2089 because: (no reason given)
how do u insert an image cps i got the bloody thing jus cnt get the picture on here
edit on 26-8-2011 by Luke2089 because: (no reason given)


on google.com/sky/

i searched venus an went 2 the right a lil then put on infra red n u cn see this massive star that is nt visible when you view it normally (this is also 2 the left of mercury)
what is it?
edit on 26-8-2011 by Luke2089 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 08:52 AM
link   
reply to post by Noobastronomer
 


Just playing along!



posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 09:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by Luke2089
edit on 26-8-2011 by Luke2089 because: wrong
edit on 26-8-2011 by Luke2089 because: (no reason given)
how do u insert an image cps i got the bloody thing jus cnt get the picture on here
edit on 26-8-2011 by Luke2089 because: (no reason given)


on google.com/sky/

i searched venus an went 2 the right a lil then put on infra red n u cn see this massive star that is nt visible when you view it normally (this is also 2 the left of mercury)
what is it?
edit on 26-8-2011 by Luke2089 because: (no reason given)
This has already been answered several times, but I'll post my answer one more time:

The infrared data on Google Sky comes from the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) whole-sky survey conducted in 1983. If you go to the catalog overlay search page, and put in the coordinates of the object (roughly 9h 47m 48s, 13° 18' 53"), with a 2.5 degree size, you can clearly see the object in the search results:



By clicking on the point source table link, we can see the list of point sources. The one with the largest flux is object 09452+1330.

By searching for that object name on Google, we find that this is also known as IRC +10216 or CW Leonis. As Wikipedia says:


IRC +10216 or CW Leonis is a well-studied carbon star that is embedded in a thick dust envelope. It was first discovered in 1969 by a group of astronomers led by Eric Becklin, based upon infrared observations made with the 62 inches (1.6 m) Caltech Infrared Telescope at Mount Wilson Observatory. Its energy is emitted mostly at infrared wavelengths. At a wavelength of 5 μm, it was found to have the highest flux of any object outside the Solar System.


So what we have here is a dying star about 400 light years away. It just happens to be a very bright IR source.





top topics
 
17
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join