It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
2. 4 hijacked planes were allowed to fly openly in US airspace (despite National Security protocol, that would normally on any other day have called for fighter Jets to intercept/ shoot down; see below).
Originally posted by samkent
Here’s why others and myself come here to refute the ignorant ideas of truthers.
People and countries whom should be helping in the fight against terrorism are starting to doubt that 911 ever happened.
Here
Wahab Khan Maseeb, 20, leaves his lectures at the medical faculty in Abbottabad. A young Pakistani-American in jeans and a T-shirt, he was in school in Brooklyn on that fateful day 10 years ago. He saw the ash cover everything.
But was it an Islamist attack? Wahab hesitates. Like others, he saw the "Loose Change" series of documentary films, which accused elements of the US government of carrying out the 9/11 attacks.
"It was pretty convincing," he says.
The constant lies and misrepresentations have chipped and chipped the minds of those who have only seen stills and video clips of the event.
AJ and his ilk have profited at the expense of our future security. If 911 had been an attack against a single company he would have been sued into bankruptcy over his lies.
What if the Afghanistan and Pakistan governments believe the crap peddled by Loose Change? They could toss us out and embrace AQ and the Taliban. The results would be more attacks.
It's one thing to pose a question now and then. But the constant steam of BS put out by AJ and his cronies is starting to threaten our security.
my bolding
“We to this day don't know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. "It was just so far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that never got tied.” Although the commission's landmark report made it clear that the Defense Department's early versions of events on the day of the attacks were inaccurate, the revelation that it considered criminal referrals reveals how skeptically those reports were viewed by the panel and provides a glimpse of the tension between it and the Bush administration.
my bolding
Farmer scrutinizes F.A.A. and Norad records to provide irrefragable evidence that a day after a Sept. 17 White House briefing, both agencies suddenly altered their chronologies to produce a coherent timeline and story that “fit together nicely with the account provided publicly by Deputy Defense Secretary Wolfowitz and Vice President Cheney.”
Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by squidboy
2. 4 hijacked planes were allowed to fly openly in US airspace (despite National Security protocol, that would normally on any other day have called for fighter Jets to intercept/ shoot down; see below).
Just who and when did we have a protocal to shoot down passenger jets?
you seem to be stuck on this point. It was known that it WOULD fall at some point.
. When you consider certain protocols were changed 3 months prior to 9/11, by Rumsfeld giving himself authority to shoot down and he did not, well that should have been investigated.
That's right ! Thet knew ahead of time because the building was rigged. You've got it. See that wasn't so hard.