Funny Pics of Obama Northbound along I-5..90 miles South of Seattle.

Originally posted by SG-17
reply to post by Daedal

 

Honestly those are disgusting. The caricature is racist itself and most of what is written (and misspelled) is untrue. This is not free speech as much as it is libel and defamation.

Wow, I guess ANYTHING that protrays ANY minority is RACIST! To satisfy you, must we remove all references to any minority? Since when is a president (black, white, half, Chinese or Christian or otherwise) exempt from editorialization?

Racist - Used when logic and truth don't work

Funny signs. I am kind of surprised at the misspelling though, being on public display and all.

Alright, these signs are pretty funny. But I still find it hilarious that Republican-sign-making-people still haven't learned to spell correctly on their signs. I know, I know, one word on one sign was spelled wrong...but come on start spelling correctly on your signs if you want more and more people to start taking you seriously! Plus, you spent what must have been countless hours making these, wouldn't you want them to be perfect?

Originally posted by SG-17

Originally posted by SpaDe_

Originally posted by SG-17
reply to post by Daedal

 

Honestly those are disgusting. The caricature is racist itself and most of what is written (and misspelled) is untrue. This is not free speech as much as it is libel and defamation.

Please, how is it racist in any way? You obviously don't read many financial or wall street news papers, because they have cartoons in them like this all the time. Get real, your only mad because it's true.

Umm... no. The accentuated ears, lips, teeth and noise coupled with the reduced cranial dome is classic racism.

It is designed to make him look like a chimp or sub-human.

edit on 8/24/2011 by SG-17 because: (no reason given)

when all you got is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail.

Originally posted by pavil

Originally posted by SG-17
reply to post by Daedal

 

Honestly those are disgusting. The caricature is racist itself and most of what is written (and misspelled) is untrue. This is not free speech as much as it is libel and defamation.

What is exactly racist about a caricature????? The man does have big ears....even he himself has made fun of them on occasion. Caricature are supposed to play on physical attributes of the person......somebody needs to not pull out the racist card too often....there is a credit limit on them you know.....
The Race Card is Maxed Out

I have to agree. Getting bent over a Cartoon is a bit ridiculous. We live in a world where
nothing is Ordinary and freedoms are being removed to such a degree, by 2020 there
will be none left if people allow things such as this to interfere. What comes around
goes around, this is the law of the universe in this reality.

Here are some quotes on freedom of expression:

The only valid censorship of ideas is the right of people not to listen.
~Tommy Smothers

The fact is that censorship always defeats its own purpose,
for it creates, in the end, the kind of society that is incapable of exercising real discretion.
~Henry Steele Commager

Censorship reflects society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime.
~Potter Stewart

We have a natural right to make use of our pens as of our tongue, at our peril, risk and hazard. ~Voltaire, Dictionnaire Philosophique, 1764

The dirtiest book of all is the expurgated book.
~Walt Whitman

Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so, too.
~Voltaire

I am thankful for all the complaining I hear about our government because it means we have freedom of speech. ~Nancie J. Carmody

The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error. ~John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, 1859

Books won't stay banned. They won't burn. Ideas won't go to jail. In the long run of history, the censor and the inquisitor have always lost. The only weapon against bad ideas is better ideas.
~Alfred Whitney Griswold, New York Times, 24 February 1959

I believe in censorship. I made a fortune out of it.
~Mae West

Censorship feeds the dirty mind more than the four-letter word itself.
~Dick Cavett

Censorship offends me. ~Author Unknown

We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.
~John F. Kennedy

Every human being has a right to hear what other wise human beings have spoken to him. It is one of the Rights of Men; a very cruel injustice if you deny it to a man!
~Thomas Carlyle

Star and flag sir, God bless you.

Absolutely true. Obama is the New World Order's puppet, he has no true power. We need to simply ignore him every time he opens his mouth.

Originally posted by Anttyk47
This would come out of Washington state.

Washington State is...like...super liberal isn't it?

Originally posted by SaturnFX
I wonder if this is by the same group that posted the "Thank God for George Bush" signs during the bush presidency.

Gotta love corporatism at its finest.

There is nothing corporatism about the signs. Anyway, libs did it to Bush for 8 years, and they also said Bush wasn't a legit Prez too!

reply to post by yadda333


Looks like you failed to get the essence of the We the Congress point. We have a representative Republic. That does not mean Congress gets to shove mandated health insurance down our throats because a group of Socialists want it.

Originally posted by kellynap43
reply to post by Indigo5

 

Yep, and how is that a different stratagey then what the left took while bush was in office?
They did the exact same thing. And so , please rinse and repeat.

Example: Obama, Biden, Pelosi all voted AGAINST providing body armor for the troops in IRAQ. Along with reinforced metal plating on HUM V to protect against land mines and RPGs. Along with many other needed materials for survival. But I guess, I can see why they would do that. After all, the more troops that die, the more Bush looks like he has failed. That is how evil and corrupt and exteme your party has gone to . Want proof? Just look up their voting history on Foreighn Policy.

Reality disconnect

It says he "voted against funding our troops." He did – exactly once. Obama cast at least 10 votes for war-funding bills before voting against one last year, after Bush vetoed a version that contained a date for withdrawal from Iraq.

www.factcheck.org...

So Pres. Bush VETOED a bill to fund our troops?? While then Senator Obama voted to fund them 10 times...every bill..except one? Get it?

Your claim is equally as valid as inserting Pres. Bush's name.
President Bush voted AGAINST providing body armor for the troops in IRAQ. Along with reinforced metal plating on HUM V to protect against land mines and RPGs. Along with many other needed materials for survival.

See....

Is this where you bitterly shout that Bush only vetoed that bill because it included a timeline for ending the war?

Yep. The same reason that Biden, Obama and some GOP by the way, all voted against that last funding bill which contained no indication that President Bush would wrap up operations in Iraq in this century.

Seeing as then Senator Obama had voted for every troop funding bill prior to that (at least 10 bills) Your claim that he did not care for the troops is just dumb and without factual support.

You know how you really look out for troops? Don't send them into a crapstorm to invade and occupy a foriegn country on false premises.

Try this for looking out for troops...

Iraq: 8 Years, 4792 American troops dead,

Libya: 6 months, ZERO troops dead.

Originally posted by Mutant

Originally posted by SG-17
reply to post by Daedal

 

Honestly those are disgusting. The caricature is racist itself and most of what is written (and misspelled) is untrue. This is not free speech as much as it is libel and defamation.

Wow, I guess ANYTHING that protrays ANY minority is RACIST! To satisfy you, must we remove all references to any minority? Since when is a president (black, white, half, Chinese or Christian or otherwise) exempt from editorialization?

Racist - Used when logic and truth don't work

And it's racist NOT to include people of other races besides white.
Remember that meme? If it's all white, it's racist.
I like your last point......and I agree with Howard Zinn.
It's a mind control tool to divide and conquer
while concealing those who seek to oppress us!

Originally posted by TXRabbit
Judging from the spelling, I have a good idea of who did this

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f5b683c599c8.jpg[/atsimg]

LOL. A redneck!
OMG! Is that RACIST?

Originally posted by SG-17
reply to post by Daedal

 

Honestly those are disgusting. The caricature is racist itself and most of what is written (and misspelled) is untrue. This is not free speech as much as it is libel and defamation.

NO, it's not racist, or disgusting or defamatory.

Anyway, he deserves it.

Originally posted by Azdraik
There have been several comments about the artists spelling, has anyone thought for a moment that they did that on purpose?

Bad spelling is the result of liberal education in public schools. Democrats have had control of the NEA and teachers unions for quite some time now. Maybe it's time to teach spelling and math instead of values clarification and revisionist history.

Originally posted by SG-17
reply to post by Daedal

 

Honestly those are disgusting. The caricature is racist itself and most of what is written (and misspelled) is untrue. This is not free speech as much as it is libel and defamation.

I think you labeling the creator of those signs racist is racist. The sad part is that the signs are mostly true. Sigh... for 98% of all the washington chumps.

reply to post by SG-17


You sound like a kool-aid drinking libtard.

Originally posted by Indigo5

Originally posted by kellynap43
reply to post by Indigo5

 

Yep, and how is that a different stratagey then what the left took while bush was in office?
They did the exact same thing. And so , please rinse and repeat.

Example: Obama, Biden, Pelosi all voted AGAINST providing body armor for the troops in IRAQ. Along with reinforced metal plating on HUM V to protect against land mines and RPGs. Along with many other needed materials for survival. But I guess, I can see why they would do that. After all, the more troops that die, the more Bush looks like he has failed. That is how evil and corrupt and exteme your party has gone to . Want proof? Just look up their voting history on Foreighn Policy.

Reality disconnect

It says he "voted against funding our troops." He did – exactly once. Obama cast at least 10 votes for war-funding bills before voting against one last year, after Bush vetoed a version that contained a date for withdrawal from Iraq.

www.factcheck.org...

So Pres. Bush VETOED a bill to fund our troops?? While then Senator Obama voted to fund them 10 times...every bill..except one? Get it?

Your claim is equally as valid as inserting Pres. Bush's name.
President Bush voted AGAINST providing body armor for the troops in IRAQ. Along with reinforced metal plating on HUM V to protect against land mines and RPGs. Along with many other needed materials for survival.

See....

Is this where you bitterly shout that Bush only vetoed that bill because it included a timeline for ending the war?

Yep. The same reason that Biden, Obama and some GOP by the way, all voted against that last funding bill which contained no indication that President Bush would wrap up operations in Iraq in this century.

Seeing as then Senator Obama had voted for every troop funding bill prior to that (at least 10 bills) Your claim that he did not care for the troops is just dumb and without factual support.

You know how you really look out for troops? Don't send them into a crapstorm to invade and occupy a foriegn country on false premises.

Try this for looking out for troops...

Iraq: 8 Years, 4792 American troops dead,

Libya: 6 months, ZERO troops dead.

edit on 25-8-2011 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)

That was a cool reply.
I like it.

Originally posted by SG-17
reply to post by Daedal

 

Honestly those are disgusting. The caricature is racist itself and most of what is written (and misspelled) is untrue. This is not free speech as much as it is libel and defamation.

What kind of blind, loyalest ignorance must some fool have in order to claim that these humorist caricatures are "racist"? It is a shame, those that really want him to succeed and are on his side are flanked by the ignorance you have just displayed, ignorant fools who run to the race card every chance they get...it allows them to avoid actually discussing the issues....

How your ignorant post got so many stars is an illustration of my main point, and that is the average internet citizen that supports Obama are their own worst enemies.......

You should be ashamed of yourself, it's people like you, who lack the intellectual ability to understand and defend his programs that will make him a one term president. But hey, we all knew when we got a black president that there would be a bunch of ignorant people out there that would play the race card every chance they got.....and this is a good example.

OP, you are an embarrassment to your political party.

Originally posted by RainbeauBleu

Originally posted by Mutant

Originally posted by SG-17
reply to post by Daedal

 

Honestly those are disgusting. The caricature is racist itself and most of what is written (and misspelled) is untrue. This is not free speech as much as it is libel and defamation.

Wow, I guess ANYTHING that protrays ANY minority is RACIST! To satisfy you, must we remove all references to any minority? Since when is a president (black, white, half, Chinese or Christian or otherwise) exempt from editorialization?

Racist - Used when logic and truth don't work

And it's racist NOT to include people of other races besides white.
Remember that meme? If it's all white, it's racist.
I like your last point......and I agree with Howard Zinn.
It's a mind control tool to divide and conquer
while concealing those who seek to oppress us!

I think it would just be discrimination based on a stereotype due to a type of prejudice.