It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Who created this archon?
No deeper analysis exists,
So, conceptually speaking, the gnostic demiurge - the 7 spheres - and the Ze'ir Anpin = YHVH (tifereth being the sphere in which he manifests) align with the same reality.
This makes a hell of alot more sense than postulating that the Jewish G-d must be a deluded archon who wants to siphon lifeforce frm mankind; and prevent them from serving the highest father, or realizng their inherent Godliness.
How could it? How does this postulate make ANY sense whatsover? How can someone simultaneously - as the deluded gnostics do - believe that G-d exists, yet deny that he has any relationship with this reality. It doesnt make sense to me.
Why is loving G-d so cliche? or so strange? One can love himself, or love others. But loving G-d, that ineffable, inexplicable presence in your life. That spirit from beyond which draws me inwards, towards Him. How is that strange??
Originally posted by filosophia
Gnosticism originated with the early Christians before the Roman empire made Christianity official.
Gnosticism was about reaching the Creator through one's self, as opposed to the church.
Since Jesus was opposed to the establishment church and its ways,
it only makes sense that the spirit of Christ led to gnosticism, which gnosis translates as "knowledge" so they were about the knowledge of God as opposed to the rituals of the church.
The Church, viewing gnosticism as competition, deemed their enemies heretics and burnt them at the stake.
The Gnostic Gallery
A Brief Visual Tour of Evidence for Gnostics and the Mysteries
One of the difficulties we face in getting a clear sense of Gnostics, Pagan religion, and the Mysteries, is the lack of tangible evidence. Most of the original literature of Pagan spirituality was intentionally destroyed, and the rest was eaten by the ravages of time. The Greek dramatist Aeschylus wrote over ninety plays, of which nine have survived intact.
This is a good benchmark. About ten percent or less of all Pagan literature survives, and probably less than one-tenth of one percent of Gnostic writings and textual material collected in the libraries attached to the Mystery Schools. (On the Coptic Gnostic texts found in Egypt in 1945, see When the Mysteries Died.) What of other evidence, such as artifacts and architecture? Consider the Greco-Roman ruins spread across Europe from the western shores of Ireland and Scotland down to the tip of the Iberian peninsula, around the Mediterranean basin and throughout Egypt and the Levant—all this is evidence of Pagan religion and the widespread network of the Mysteries. In many cases, the ruins of classical world are superposed over another layer of evidence: the megalithic constructions of prehistory.
The sacred grottos of the Black Virgin, for instance, became the sites for cathedrals and abbeys at Chartres, Glastonbury, and elsewhere. Shamanic religion in Europa was the prehistorical matrix of the Mysteries. This archeological evidence is also spread all across Europe and into the Middle East. The purpose of this gallery is to display non-textual evidence presenting visual traces of the Mysteries and the Gnostic seers, the telestai, who directed them. In some cases, the evidence points in a general way to Pagan religion, in other instances, it indicates specific aspects of Gnostic practice and Mystery ritual. The value of this evidence lies in its visual impact (short of going to the places depicted), but I have supplied brief comments to describe.
A Cosmic Abortion
The central event in Gnostic cosmology concerns the Aeon Sophia, a divinity in the Pleroma (astronomically speaking, the core of our galaxy, or any galaxy). In the scenario of the Fallen Sophia, the Aeon plunges from the cosmic center and produces a massive perturbation in the realms of elementary matter, the encircling limbs. This mythological event may be envisioned in a way consistent with modern cosmological physics: The erratic surge of a plasmatic stream from the galactic core exites the elementary matter in the limbs, producing a spate of inorganic life-forms.
They are called Archons (from the Greek archai, "prior, from the beginning") because they arise first, before the sun and the planetary system as a whole. Archons are humanoid creatures of inorganic composition, but alive and aware in their own way. Their first habitat is the region where the galactic limb has been impacted by the "shoot" of plasma from the core. (Astrophysicists now surmise the existence of such shoots by the evidence of thread-like tunnels extending from the core, or central bulge, into the limb-structure.) This agitation occurs in the region of Orion, the most well-known and easily recognized of all the starry constellations. The Archontic entities so produced are of two types, neonate (or embryonic, resembling the human foetus) and drakonic (resembling reptiles or lizards, but still humanoid). The rudimentary forms of these entities can be traced in fractal patterns around the Mandelbrot Set. (See Alien Dreaming.)
Gnostics called this event "the generation of the Archons," or "the generation of error," because they equated the Archons with the human tendency for error—a curious trope, to be explained below, concerning the Gnostic theory of error, and in the profile of Archontic intrusion in How We Are Deviated. In a bizarre image, the fractal Archon generation is compared to "an abortion without any power of its own. Like a shadow it came into existence in a vast watery substance... And Sophia hovered over the chaotic matter, which has been expelled like an aborted foetus." (On the Origin of the World, 99: 5-10, 20-25)
Sophia did it by accident. Her creation (Yaldabaoth) woke up and saw creation and mistakenly believed that it created it. That is why he is referred to as a blind idiot.
That's because these folks were systematically wiped out by the Catholic church. Search the saying 'Kill them all let god sort them out (God will know his own)', you are in for a little surprise concerning the origins of that saying
I understand that you see this 'Gnosticism' as an attempt to obfuscate Judaism but realize that whatever obfuscation Judaism has suffered was suffered tenfold by the 'Gnostics' at the hands of the Catholic church.
We come into this world as slaves; not free people. The siphoning is just par for the course; a regular matter of affairs here in the sub lunar realm.
They believed that god exists but that he is a counterfeit god that created a counterfeit world due to an accident (abortion) on the part of Sophia. They had a relationship with this entity but it was acknowledged as a Slave/Master relationship.
Cause they were short sighted and egotistical? I don't think so.
Why do the beliefs of the Gnostics create so much anxiety for Judeo Christians?
The Jews have endured a much longer oppression under the catholic church, ie; being burned in synagogues, forced conversions, locked up in ghettos, than the gnostics have.
I dont get that. How is that a 'regular matter of affairs"?? Because Gnostics and Theosophists say so?
The wa ive obseved Jews serve G-d, does not at all jibe with this gnostic idea of a archon that siphons life force.
They simply 'saw' just what Yahwe and the Archons were - imposters, parasites and predators. as in fact anyone with an ounce of commonsense should really be able to tell just from their ridiculous utterances and commands!
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by JohhnyBGood
They simply 'saw' just what Yahwe and the Archons were - imposters, parasites and predators. as in fact anyone with an ounce of commonsense should really be able to tell just from their ridiculous utterances and commands!
Thats something an ignoramus would consider common sense.
know what I mean? Trying to put the Gnostics into context with Judeo Christianity by using these texts as a measuring rule seems a little misguided to me. I mean no offense; I just am amazed, myself, when folks try to understand 'Gnosticism' from this angle.
Why would 'Elohim' not jibe with the 'Gnostics? Elohim is at least plural. Sophia had to emanate from someplace; and the demiurge emanated from 'Her'; plural. Maybe for some reasons the Jews don't see Sophia's accident as an accident.
I see that you are very enamored of Judaism and I think that is great.
God is the narrow path between the tear in the veil. It's not exoteric and it's not esoteric. The path is between. The rock (Peter / Church) must be rolled away. We must rise to new life from the baptism of the material world. We must be the ones to pull the veil back and reveal the love of God on the other side of our own creations of chaos.
Ultimately, this life is the whole truth and all degrees of infinity. This includes evil. We must rightly divide the light from the darkness by God's example. Each human has the opportunity to walk the path of Israel in the wilderness. We live in a tent (body) by the leading of the Good Shepherd (God).
Very interesting, but I'm curious as to how you've come to reject the notion that the tree of life manifested itself, fully realized, through the Jewish kabbalistic mystical tradition, in the form of a human being as G-d embodied and the principal personified. Are you familiar with the deeper, esoteric meaning of the name Yeshua (look into it)?
The literal meaning of "Ehyeh"-"I shall be"-implies new birth or revelation of self. In context of the verse in which it appears, Ehyeh suggests that the essence of God's own Self will be born, as it were, into reality with the spiritual birth of humanity through their redemption from exile. This of course leads to the understanding of the land of Egypt as the spiritual womb of the Jewish people. God's becoming in reality is thus linked intrinsically with the becoming of the Children of Israel into a nation.