It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For some scientists, the Higgs remains the simplest explanation of how matter got mass. It remains unclear what could replace it as an explanation. "We know something is missing, we simply don't quite know what this new something might be," wrote CERN blogger Pauline Gagnon.
Source
Originally posted by Angry Danish
t = sqrt
Originally posted by Helious
I agree, our tech has exceeded our wisdom, they don't even know what they hell there looking for over there. Time for a chalk board and endless conjecture because our brains can't exceed what we already know because frankly, there just not ready for it and nature has a funny way of telling you that.
Originally posted by stirling
Let us rather say tha cerne is seeking further wisdom......
There is an open court scramble to peoduce the essesnce of the iniverse.The missing link.
I think they should be looking to WB Smiths bookThe New Science.
Though it wasnt finished it still may contain clues that the boffins can use to unravel the basics....
Plasmas may contain some vital clue as well......
The solution to your problem;
t = sqrt ( 1 - v^2/c^2 )
The Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction equation, well actually, the inverse gives the result of mass.
Allow me to explain:
This equation calculates the increase in mass of an object in relative motion to an observer. Which is to say, matter never "got mass" from anything. "Mass" is nothing more than a result of the occupation of spacetime - all matter occupies spacetime therefore all matter has mass.
Care to elaborate instead of just calling me stupid and walking away?
Originally posted by Angry Danish
Care to elaborate instead of just calling me stupid and walking away?