The Mtn. States may be more safe than other areas because of lack of plants built in that location, but that does not, in itself, suggest that they are a "safe zone" for the "chosen ones" ... I think there is a more logical explanation, no?

The majority of plants would be located in the Western part of the Country not the East and that is because of the direction the wind would carry the Nuclear fallout. Is it coincidence that most plastics plants are located on the Eastern coast? Plastics are known to cause lower sperm levels in the male gender of all species.

I think they are there because they are probably better locations for whatever reasons.

Originally posted by kimish
The majority of plants would be located in the Western part of the Country not the East and that is because of the direction the wind would carry the Nuclear fallout. .

What if the plan was for most of the fallout to travel east of the east coast? It's a big world...

Safe Zone? Not Denver. Denver is already getting it from Fukushima.
The only safety lies in being prepared, being healthy and able to deal with a toxic earth. The earth will survive.

........

I can think of another reason that nuclear powerplants are nearby siginificant population centers. Can you?

There are better ways to reduce the earths population, that wont turn Nort America into a radioactive wasteland for the next 50.000 years.

lol at there being a safe zone on that map.


If you lose 1/20th of those plants we are all screwed

Originally posted by readytorevolt
lol at there being a safe zone on that map.


If you lose 1/20th of those plants we are all screwed

Makes you wonder if they are really worth it then doesn't it?

Or perhaps they are in strategic places where the demand for electricity is higher. This has nothing to do with depopulation. You do realize that the amount of fallout would screw the whole planet, including for those orchestrating 'depopulation' right?

If you look hard enough you'll see a pattern in anything. Human beings do stupid things like build stuff in the wrong place etc. If they want to depopulate the planet there are a lot easier ways than the convoluted method you are implying here.

Originally posted by Enlightenme1111

Originally posted by readytorevolt
lol at there being a safe zone on that map.


If you lose 1/20th of those plants we are all screwed

Makes you wonder if they are really worth it then doesn't it?

I know for a fact they are not worth it. Energy suppression for economic gain is one of the biggest problems facing humans as a whole

Originally posted by Domo1
You do realize that the amount of fallout would screw the whole planet, including for those orchestrating 'depopulation' right?

Maybe. What if it the agenda wasn't from humans? What if they had technology to counter the effects or clean it up? Come on, let's talk conspiracy!

Originally posted by Domo1
Or perhaps they are in strategic places where the demand for electricity is higher. This has nothing to do with depopulation. You do realize that the amount of fallout would screw the whole planet, including for those orchestrating 'depopulation' right?

The planet would not be screwed by a few Western nuclear reactors melting down. It wasn't screwed by Chernobyl, it wasn't screwed by Fukushima, it wasn't screwed by the hundreds of megatons of nuclear weapons we've detonated. The planet is very hard to screw. A bunch of American nukes melting down would only screw the immediately affected areas, and maybe some agriculture. It wouldn't even kill very many people. You'd get some excess cancers, but they would probably occur long after reproduction, which does little for depopulation.

Originally posted by Enlightenme1111

Originally posted by Domo1
You do realize that the amount of fallout would screw the whole planet, including for those orchestrating 'depopulation' right?

Maybe. What if it the agenda wasn't from humans? What if they had technology to counter the effects or clean it up? Come on, let's talk conspiracy!

edit on 23-8-2011 by Enlightenme1111 because: (no reason given)

Come on, let's deny ignorance.

What IF, there was a pill one could take that would render the radiactive effects on the body harmless. What IF, certain people possessed this pill. What IF, certain people used this knoweledge against you for DEPOPULATION PURPOSES. what if. scarey, very scarey.

Originally posted by readytorevolt

Originally posted by Enlightenme1111

Originally posted by readytorevolt
lol at there being a safe zone on that map.


If you lose 1/20th of those plants we are all screwed

Makes you wonder if they are really worth it then doesn't it?

I know for a fact they are not worth it. Energy suppression for economic gain is one of the biggest problems facing humans as a whole

Yes, let's go back to coal-burning and natural gas powerplants that are highly inefficient and put up more pollutants. The reactor in VA that went offline because of the quake did exactly what it was supposed to in the situation....The reactor was SCRAMed and cooling water was kept circulating with auxillary generators.

Originally posted by seabhac-rua

Come on, let's deny ignorance.

Ignorance may be what built them in the first place, so I agree with you on that.
I wonder if it's still ignorance that we're building more, even after Fukushima.