Are we being setup for depopulation? A picture of all nuclear power plants in the United States.

page: 1
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 07:50 PM
link   



There is a large safe zone here with Denver in the middle. For those not familiar with the Denver conspiracy, please refer to www.abovetopsecret.com...

Many of you already know what is really going on at Fukushima, and now there are reports of problems with reactors in Louisa County, Va. due to the earthquake - Source

Imagine what would happen if an earthquake/tsunami event happened on the east coast? What if a solar flare/EMP type event knocked down our grid? Just something to think about...




posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 07:54 PM
link   
The Mtn. States may be more safe than other areas because of lack of plants built in that location, but that does not, in itself, suggest that they are a "safe zone" for the "chosen ones" ... I think there is a more logical explanation, no?
edit on 23-8-2011 by LadySkadi because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 07:56 PM
link   
The majority of plants would be located in the Western part of the Country not the East and that is because of the direction the wind would carry the Nuclear fallout. Is it coincidence that most plastics plants are located on the Eastern coast? Plastics are known to cause lower sperm levels in the male gender of all species.

I think they are there because they are probably better locations for whatever reasons.



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 07:59 PM
link   
I still think there is something to the UN Biodiversity Map.........





posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 08:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by kimish
The majority of plants would be located in the Western part of the Country not the East and that is because of the direction the wind would carry the Nuclear fallout. .


What if the plan was for most of the fallout to travel east of the east coast? It's a big world...



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 08:03 PM
link   
Safe Zone? Not Denver. Denver is already getting it from Fukushima.
The only safety lies in being prepared, being healthy and able to deal with a toxic earth. The earth will survive.



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 08:04 PM
link   
........

I can think of another reason that nuclear powerplants are nearby siginificant population centers. Can you?

There are better ways to reduce the earths population, that wont turn Nort America into a radioactive wasteland for the next 50.000 years.



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 08:39 PM
link   
lol at there being a safe zone on that map.


If you lose 1/20th of those plants we are all screwed



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 08:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by readytorevolt
lol at there being a safe zone on that map.


If you lose 1/20th of those plants we are all screwed


Makes you wonder if they are really worth it then doesn't it?



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 08:56 PM
link   
Or perhaps they are in strategic places where the demand for electricity is higher. This has nothing to do with depopulation. You do realize that the amount of fallout would screw the whole planet, including for those orchestrating 'depopulation' right?



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 09:02 PM
link   
If you look hard enough you'll see a pattern in anything. Human beings do stupid things like build stuff in the wrong place etc. If they want to depopulate the planet there are a lot easier ways than the convoluted method you are implying here.



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 09:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by Enlightenme1111

Originally posted by readytorevolt
lol at there being a safe zone on that map.


If you lose 1/20th of those plants we are all screwed


Makes you wonder if they are really worth it then doesn't it?



I know for a fact they are not worth it. Energy suppression for economic gain is one of the biggest problems facing humans as a whole



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 09:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Enlightenme1111
 

Rather a lot near to major fault line you have to admit. Humans are rather foolish is all I think. Makes you wonder though.



Oh, and they can't build them too far from population centres as it is too inefficient to conduct the power a long way.
edit on 23/8/11 by Pimander because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 09:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Domo1
You do realize that the amount of fallout would screw the whole planet, including for those orchestrating 'depopulation' right?


Maybe. What if it the agenda wasn't from humans? What if they had technology to counter the effects or clean it up? Come on, let's talk conspiracy!
edit on 23-8-2011 by Enlightenme1111 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 09:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Domo1
Or perhaps they are in strategic places where the demand for electricity is higher. This has nothing to do with depopulation. You do realize that the amount of fallout would screw the whole planet, including for those orchestrating 'depopulation' right?

The planet would not be screwed by a few Western nuclear reactors melting down. It wasn't screwed by Chernobyl, it wasn't screwed by Fukushima, it wasn't screwed by the hundreds of megatons of nuclear weapons we've detonated. The planet is very hard to screw. A bunch of American nukes melting down would only screw the immediately affected areas, and maybe some agriculture. It wouldn't even kill very many people. You'd get some excess cancers, but they would probably occur long after reproduction, which does little for depopulation.



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 09:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Enlightenme1111

Originally posted by Domo1
You do realize that the amount of fallout would screw the whole planet, including for those orchestrating 'depopulation' right?


Maybe. What if it the agenda wasn't from humans? What if they had technology to counter the effects or clean it up? Come on, let's talk conspiracy!
edit on 23-8-2011 by Enlightenme1111 because: (no reason given)


Come on, let's deny ignorance.



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 09:57 PM
link   
What IF, there was a pill one could take that would render the radiactive effects on the body harmless. What IF, certain people possessed this pill. What IF, certain people used this knoweledge against you for DEPOPULATION PURPOSES. what if. scarey, very scarey.



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 10:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Enlightenme1111
 


Nuclear plants on that map coincide with population centers. Thats not a conspiracy but planning since transmission of electricity over large areas doesnt work out all that well.



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 10:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by readytorevolt

Originally posted by Enlightenme1111

Originally posted by readytorevolt
lol at there being a safe zone on that map.


If you lose 1/20th of those plants we are all screwed


Makes you wonder if they are really worth it then doesn't it?



I know for a fact they are not worth it. Energy suppression for economic gain is one of the biggest problems facing humans as a whole


Yes, let's go back to coal-burning and natural gas powerplants that are highly inefficient and put up more pollutants. The reactor in VA that went offline because of the quake did exactly what it was supposed to in the situation....The reactor was SCRAMed and cooling water was kept circulating with auxillary generators.



posted on Aug, 23 2011 @ 10:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by seabhac-rua

Come on, let's deny ignorance.


Ignorance may be what built them in the first place, so I agree with you on that.
I wonder if it's still ignorance that we're building more, even after Fukushima.





new topics
 
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join