Regardless of your opinions of 9/11 , you need to read this.

page: 6
33
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join

posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 04:36 AM
link   
9/11 MADNESS
post removed because of personal attacks

Click here to learn more about this warning.




posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 04:43 AM
link   
I see that people on both sides of the argument are still insisting on back biting and name calling .
If you cannot present your opinions in a mature and intelligent fashion , then I suggest you go and post elsewhere.

One more point to clear up . Evidence is not proof ...Evidence is just a group of facts , which after careful analysis
can be deemed either proof or false.
Some evidence is undeniable proof and when that is the case , there is little point in debating such evidence.

Lets get this thread back on track.



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 04:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by tpg65
Here is proof that a 757 did NOT strike the Pentagon



Now , what are the implications of this ?
The official story is that an hijacked boeing 757 was flown into the pentagon.
The picture above shows that it was not the case .
So the official story must be a lie and we must assume that the official story of the rest of the events of that day is also a lie .

This is not bias ....This is common sense

I am no longer going to sit on the fence . I call foul to TPTB .


There is a large chunk of 757 debris in that photo.

So how does that picture prove that a 757 did not hit the pentagon. Please be specific.

I will provide you with a drawing showing where the plane impacted and the location of that hole.

Do you think that hole is to big, to small, not in the right place ? What exactly is your claim ? What is the evidence to back up your claim ?




posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 04:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by tpg65
Here is proof that a 757 did NOT strike the Pentagon



Just where is the "proof" it was not a 757 in that picture? THERE IS NONE, OF COURSE!
edit on 24-8-2011 by spoor because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 04:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by tpg65
You obviously didn't read the opening post .
Do not under any circumstances post again in this thread without evidence to back up your statement


So just where is the evidence to back that silly claim? There is none!

You do not get to say who can post in any thread.



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 04:59 AM
link   
Ok .
so what have we learned so far ?

WTC7 was destroyed in a controlled demolishion and a large amount of gold was stolen from one of the lower levels...Fact.

A 757 did not hit the Pentagon , while it remains unclear what did . . Fact.

.Nobody has ever been tried in OPEN court for crimes committed on that day ....Fact.

TPTB had everything to gain from the events of 9/11 . The introduction of the patriot act the invasion of Afghanistan ...Fact.



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 05:01 AM
link   
9/11 MADNESS
post removed because of personal attacks

Click here to learn more about this warning.



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 05:03 AM
link   
reply to post by spoor
 


There is no wreckage in that picture that would substantiate a strike by a 757.



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 05:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by tpg65
Ok .
so what have we learned so far ?

WTC7 was destroyed in a controlled demolishion


not a fact at all, there is zero evidence explosives were used


and a large amount of gold was stolen from one of the lower levels...Fact.


Wrong again, just another truther lie, not backed up with any evidence


A 757 did not hit the Pentagon , while it remains unclear what did . . Fact.


still wrong, how do you explain the 757 undercarriage, 757 wheels, 757 engines, 757 seats, bodies from flight 77 etc.

So the only fact you have is you are not actually interested in what actually happened, prefering to believe silly conspiracy theories not based on any facts!



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 05:07 AM
link   
reply to post by waypastvne
 


Care to highlight any wreckage in that picture that belongs to a 757 ?

Your drawing is meaningless and speculative . Look at the size of the impact hole . Also where is the damage that would have been caused by 1000's of gallon of aviation fuel ?

Again I conclude that a 757 did not strike the Pentagon .



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 05:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by spoor

Originally posted by tpg65
Ok .
so what have we learned so far ?

WTC7 was destroyed in a controlled demolishion


not a fact at all, there is zero evidence explosives were used


and a large amount of gold was stolen from one of the lower levels...Fact.


Wrong again, just another truther lie, not backed up with any evidence


A 757 did not hit the Pentagon , while it remains unclear what did . . Fact.


still wrong, how do you explain the 757 undercarriage, 757 wheels, 757 engines, 757 seats, bodies from flight 77 etc.

So the only fact you have is you are not actually interested in what actually happened, prefering to believe silly conspiracy theories not based on any facts!


Spoor ... Run along and find some evidence of 757 having struck the pentagon . There's a good chap



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 05:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by tpg65
Run along and find some evidence of 757 having struck the pentagon .


it has been posted here many many times before, but you refuse to look at it as it totally destroys your silly conspiracy theories.



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 05:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by spoor

Originally posted by tpg65
Run along and find some evidence of 757 having struck the pentagon .


it has been posted here many many times before, but you refuse to look at it as it totally destroys your silly conspiracy theories.


Since you obviously don't want to provide any evidence . How about a link so that I might judge for myself ?



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 05:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by tpg65

A 757 did not hit the Pentagon , while it remains unclear what did . . Fact.


This piece of debris is visible in that photo. It is about 3 1/2' wide by about 8' long. It is from a boeing 757. It is from the forward port underside of the fuselage, in-between the nose wheel bay and the E&E access door.
Your photo shows proof that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon. Your fact, is in fact, not a fact.

edit on 24-8-2011 by waypastvne because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 05:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by waypastvne

Originally posted by tpg65

A 757 did not hit the Pentagon , while it remains unclear what did . . Fact.


This piece of debris is visible in that photo. It is about 3 1/2' wide by about 8' long. It is from a boeing 757. It is from the forward port underside of the fuselage, in-between the nose wheel bay and the E&E access door.
Your photo shows proof that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon. Your fact, is in fact, not a fact.

edit on 24-8-2011 by waypastvne because: (no reason given)


To me that looks like any old peice of scrap metal.

Are we building miniature 757's now ?



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 05:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by waypastvne
This piece of debris is visible in that photo. It is about 3 1/2' wide by about 8' long. It is from a boeing 757. It is from the forward port underside of the fuselage, in-between the nose wheel bay and the E&E access door.
Your photo shows proof that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon. Your fact is not a fact.



the op is just not interested in anything that he disagrees with, this is a very good description
www.abovetopsecret.com...

here is a thread on a 757 hitting the pentagon
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 05:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by tpg65
Are we building miniature 757's now ?


You really have no clue at all, do you? Do you think that is the hole that the 757 that hit the Pentagon went through?



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 05:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by hooper
. Those 19 and those that supported them are responsible for the deaths. End of story.


oh yes.. you are so content in your findings.. yet.. who are these "those" that supported them? I'm sure the answer is in your brain somewhere hooper. so please.. enlighten the crowd.



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 05:32 AM
link   
reply to post by tpg65
 



And how many of these were on trial for 9/11 ? ?? ....I'll tell ya ..NONE

Then you would be lying. Nice fact finding mission there.



posted on Aug, 24 2011 @ 05:44 AM
link   
reply to post by spoor
 


Thanks spoor. I know the Boeing 757 thread, I'm just truther teasing. It's my favourite entertainment.



top topics
 
33
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join