It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Yankee451
Originally posted by JonU2
reply to post by Yankee451
Well, I work with three people who were there on that fateful day, one of whom I talked to on the phone on that day. I've since discussed it at length with them and seen a personal video recording made by one of them when the second plane hit (which has never been seen or touched by the mainstream media, I must add).
I've got to tell you that you are talking absolute nonsense as these witnesses certainly saw the second plane as it was flying toward the tower and as it hit it...............
I think you ought to rethink your theory pal!
If you read this thread alone, you'll see you're full of it.
Not sure at all what you're inferring but my friends exist, I know they were there that day and I've seen the tape which shows the second plane.............just letting you know the reason for my whole questioning of your 'no plane' theory. Believe it or don't believe it - no big deal to me.
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by JonU2
Not sure at all what you're inferring but my friends exist, I know they were there that day and I've seen the tape which shows the second plane.............just letting you know the reason for my whole questioning of your 'no plane' theory. Believe it or don't believe it - no big deal to me.
Fabricating eye witnesses has been bludgeoned to death...you'll make number 7 if I recall.
You aren't nearly as impressive as Hooper or FDNY343 though.
Ah, so that's your tactic, I get it. Anybody who disproves your ridiculous theory is lying. Well, that IS pretty fulproof in an online forum....you can label any evidence that doesn't agree with your theory as faked and those that bring it as liars. You must be pretty proud of yourself.
The only difference with me is that I believe the OS to be just as ridiculous as your 'no plane' theory. I believe that this was a Mossad operation with the 'consent' of a few in power in the US Government that helped 'smooth the way' for the whole thing.
There was definitely planes there though - not saying that the images shown on the MSM were all untouched and real but, again, there was definitely planes used in New York on 911.........
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by JonU2
Ah, so that's your tactic, I get it. Anybody who disproves your ridiculous theory is lying. Well, that IS pretty fulproof in an online forum....you can label any evidence that doesn't agree with your theory as faked and those that bring it as liars. You must be pretty proud of yourself.
The only difference with me is that I believe the OS to be just as ridiculous as your 'no plane' theory. I believe that this was a Mossad operation with the 'consent' of a few in power in the US Government that helped 'smooth the way' for the whole thing.
There was definitely planes there though - not saying that the images shown on the MSM were all untouched and real but, again, there was definitely planes used in New York on 911.........
I've stated my position numerous times, and I've supplied my proof.
Spare us and read the thread or read the freaking OP at least. This is a collaboration, and anyone who comes out swinging with ridicule only proves the point of my original position.
If you want to discuss this in a rational way, fine, but I've suffered through thirty some odd pages of your very argument and still no one has offered to address the evidence.
Originally posted by Juanxlink
So you know its smoke, because you were there? Gotta love bold claims...
As has been pointed out, anyone that has seen a few plane crashes will tell you 1 or 2 things about shanks.
Originally posted by galdur
Where is this Hooper guy? I´m waiting for them to explain why testimony of firefighters - fire professionals - is totally excluded from the official story and these people are under a gag order to boot. Why would that be? Why would you suppress witnesses at one site while elevating others at a different site ? Identify issues.
Originally posted by galdur
So, who are these Pentagon witnesses? Have they even be heard from in the last decade?
Originally posted by galdur
reply to post by hooper
Everything that was put out in the official report had to be approved by all commission members.
As an obvious result it´s just contrived nonsense.
They include what supported the conclusion they were told to achieve beforehand and ignore the rest.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by DragonriderGal
This one didn't have any reason to be different.. i
It was inverted.That means the lift vector was inverted. You probably don't understand what difference that makes. But thats one of the reasons why you'r a Truther.
The smoking gun of 911 is that EMPTY field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
There is no jet, there. There are no bodies, no luggage, no landing gear, no tires, no (miles) of wiring, no tail, no wings and no engines; specifically, two of them, weighing 6 tons, each and made of titanium.
Wally Miller, the coroner at Shanksville said he found no blood, but found human remains. When pushed on the question of finding human remains, Miller said...Yes/No/Some....and then said that the only remains found were hands and feet - nothing else. So, did Mr. Miller find 40 pair of each? If so, how is it that no other body parts survived? How is it that there was no blood? There was no fire to eviscerate any of the materials, so what happened to it - all.
They tell us that the scar in the ground is supposed to be the wings, but if that's so, where are the wings? If so, then why is/was there no outline of the engines? Where are the engines?
It should also be noted that the scar in the field appears in a Google earth search from 1999. So, if the scar was already there, then the only thing that is there (new) would be the crater.
Note: Wally Miller, the coroner, stipulates that - the crater was no more then 10 ft. deep...maybe 20 feet wide.
Question - how do you fit a 100 ton plane (the specs are on the webpage listed), into a 10 foot hole and leave none of it or the passengers and cargo, in the hole? [my addition: Or even outside the hole?]
They want you to believe that it either evaporated or that they dug it all out later and just never bothered showing you.
What happened to all the jet fuel? There was no raging fire at Shanksville, so what happened to the fuel. I thought fuel was so bad it could drop a building in NY in 57 and 90 minutes respectively and then cause a third to fall for no reason at all, at 5:20 pm. (WTC7 aka the Salomon Brothers Building)
No - there's no jet there. Something went into that field, but it wasn't a jet and it wasn't flight 93.
And if there's no jet - then that means that the official "story" of 911 is a lie!