It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by avatar22
reply to post by ElGuapo1
Any ideas about "where" we should meet?
Originally posted by Kanzler
This is a proof for the fractal order of the universe - and so the time and our consciousness, this is what the three pictures actually describe.
Originally posted by Kanzler
Hey @ all, I'm new in here, I'm a guy from germany and a few days while lookin' around in the internet I found the oct282011 site. I was following your posts and the website and everything around it and put it together with my experiences and theories. And i have following conclusion:
It is true that the "thing" we call "consciousness" is not just a personal thing. We share consciousness, because everything is consciousness. On Oct. 28 there will be a change in consciousness - the people which are opened for this will experience this, or they just had experienced it now. The universe is a web of clusters, a web of informations, a web of everything existing. And once, it was ONE. So - where did consciousness came from? When everything was one before the big bang - consciousness must be existent in this time. It was not created by or after the big bang. It was there. It is there. It just splitted. But everyone of us share this concsciousness. It is like a dream we're all in. There is no need for this experiment of collective lucid dreams, shared by a group meeting in this dreams. Because we ARE meeting in one big dream. And after experiencing lucid dreams, I realized that beeing awake is nothing more than a "dream", or: A dream is the same as consciousness. It is a small part of consciousness, it is our personal part of it. And beeing awaken, we are in the real lucid dream - because everyone sharing this dream makes this dream possible and all the small dreams together makes the big one. Everything that isn't observed by a part of the members of the big one is not either true or false. By observing a thing, it is added to our shared world, so it becomes existent.
This means that love becomes the key to great happiness all over the world - because if you are loving your world you're experiencing, then you give love to all the other parts of the world, and they are part of you and your consciousness, so giving love will result in achieving love.
The other thing I learned while tripping on this stuff is that time is not, what we was teached it is. If the universe is consciousness and we are getting closer and closer to explore the one big consciousness we share, we return to one. This is explained often at the websites and your thoughts. The picture with the circle and the infinity-sign teaches two things: Art first, time is infinite. There is no end (Open explained it in a source code comment). This is the usual perspective on time. But the circle describes another interesting thing: Time is maybe not linear, it is recurrent - and so will one be divided in many and return to one. The circle is closing and it will restart. Think of the references to fractals (the tour through reality, the spiral clock described by the .wav and much more). They are part of the chaos theory and a recurrent, self-repeating pattern. Opening your eyes, you will see that o many things obey the law of fractals. The golden ratio is as much important as pi - because fractals are recurrent as circles are. And now remember the newly added feature with the numbers 1, 2, 3 and the 3 Symbols "Thoughts", "Time" and the big circle with the 4 smaller circles around it. Do you know what this circles mean?
It is the fournier-universe, a diagramm of a fractal multi-universe, invented to solve the Olbers paradox! sprott.physics.wisc.edu... en.wikipedia.org...'_paradox
Much love and one-ness to all of you!
PS.: I'm sorry for my bad englishedit on 19-10-2011 by Kanzler because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by chats
reply to post by JackTheTripper
do you referring to that :
science.howstuffworks.com...
The objection is absurd, since it is not initially defined in the imaginary experiment, in the case that triggers the collapse and in any case it is a deadly event.
(from wiki source)
scratching head
Originally posted by JackTheTripper
reply to post by chats
about your avatar - wanted: schrödingers cat, dead & alive.. Why not try to be the cat?
Originally posted by chats
reply to post by BlueberryHillBlueStar
Hi BlueberryHillBlueStar,
thank you, i am trying to catch up, but who is open and what are manuals ?