It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New Creepy 10/28/11 Website Mystery

page: 635
104
<< 632  633  634    636  637  638 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 12:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by whatsinaname
oh that I can reveal, I already said about that back on p150~ it was alas babylon or ivanova on these forums.

I can safely say no further attempt has been made to the security of my system and it may have been coincidense, I can't stress that enough, it was just plain odd and enough to get me in contact with the previous owner of the laptop just to be sure no data was lost. if any other situation occurs I will contact skeptic directly.


Did you, by any chance, happen to enter your username into the safe? Thinking maybe it was the key?




posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 12:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Molimo
reply to post by OneisOne
 


If they just closed it down it could cause an outrage on the community so they draw attention away to do it in a more subtle way


If it caused anyone outrage, they would have to just move on. I've seen this happen. A thread is closed, someone posts another thread about it, then that thread is closed and the "outraged" person banned. This is their domain, their rules.

But I think you missed my point.

The wiki password requirement happened after the ATS game. The person behind oct28 site made that change.

Why???

To keep people interested!

OiO



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 12:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by favouriteslave

I don't believe in god in traditional terms. God is not a person. I use it in terms of everything that is. All of creation, all of everything. I use it as an all emcompassing term. I'm atheist, I don't believe in religion or a traditional "god"

We are all one. A fragment of the singularity....expanding through cycles


You're right. However, if you truly were the god-less you claim (and that is no judgement) why would you EVEN refer to ANY thing as God "in terms of everything that is"..?
I'm on your side.
Only, never forget words DO have meaning. That is why we have a word for every thing, actually.
That's how clever we are, indeed.
edit on 22-9-2011 by TheSilentwalker because: corrected typo



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 12:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Molimo
reply to post by OneisOne
 


Either that or ATS is trying to stall/stop/sabotage us
edit on 22-9-2011 by Molimo because: (no reason given)


See, Molimo, that's precisely where you are blatantly being paranoid.
I don't know…
Pull yourself together?
Please?
If only for your own sake?



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 12:49 PM
link   
reply to post by TheSilentwalker
 


Gods aren't everything only the best humans and probably any other species



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 12:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by OneisOne
Doesn't anybody find it odd that the wiki became password protected right after ATS started a puzzle game that requires passwords. And that the wiki change has people looking in to the codes and math again.

Wasn't it posted on the oct28 site that the math and material are not important, that the manuals are? Now easy access to the manuals has been disabled. Why would that be? To get people chasing the codes again and keep interest.

As the oct28 site states: there are no coincidences.

reply to post by TheSilentwalker
 

Your Sept. 19th post is a classic!

OiO


Exactly.
There are BUT coincidences.
And when it is not… it is scheduled mind game.

Quod Erat Demonstrandum.



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 12:55 PM
link   
Interesting....

Record-7 Seals beyond Einstein theory

Are these the "7 seals" revealed as "beyond Einstien theory"?
edit on 9/22/2011 by TNTarheel because: spelling



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 12:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Molimo
 


Meh… That's the best answer that can be formulated here.
M. E. H.



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 12:56 PM
link   
reply to post by TNTarheel
 


Just like Newton was proved to be incorrect, so will Einstein.

It takes time. We'll get there. It is a progression of understanding and experience.
edit on 22-9-2011 by 0pened because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 12:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheSilentwalker

Originally posted by favouriteslave

I don't believe in god in traditional terms. God is not a person. I use it in terms of everything that is. All of creation, all of everything. I use it as an all emcompassing term. I'm atheist, I don't believe in religion or a traditional "god"

We are all one. A fragment of the singularity....expanding through cycles


You're right. However, if you truly were the god)lass you claim (and that is no judgement) why would you EVEN refer to ANY thing as God "in terms of everything that is"..?
I'm on your side.
Only, never forget words DO have meaning. That is why we have a word for every thing, actually.
That's how clever we are, indeed.


Because aside from ATS most people I know still believe in god in a traditional sense. I speak like that to help them ease into the transition from believing in a god to really understanding what their "god" really is. It's a slow transition from the god on a cloud with a harp to god isn't really god, it's just the singularity or everything we know in a bigger sense. It was easier for me because I didn't believe in "god" from the getgo, for others its not so easy. I have to always pretend I'm talking to children when I speak of "god"



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 12:57 PM
link   
reply to post by TNTarheel
 


Possible still not enough to state that its really him



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 01:01 PM
link   
reply to post by favouriteslave
 


Stop pretending you're talking to children then. Seriously. It's a service to your self and everyone you address to.
Just what I said: sometimes, love is neither a kiss nor a caress: just blatant, cold and harsh truth.
How does the fainted wakes up if not by slapping?

I hear you, my friend. And I do like and respect your caution and loving arm, at that.



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 01:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by 0pened
reply to post by TNTarheel
 


Just like Newton was proved to be incorrect, so will Einstein.

It takes time. We'll get there. It is a progression of understanding and experience.
edit on 22-9-2011 by 0pened because: (no reason given)


Perhaps you would care to check the links before posting, yes?



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 01:04 PM
link   
reply to post by TNTarheel
 


True, sunshine.
However, opened is on another parallel vibe here.
Don't you people see the web you are indeed creating?

Mind. Boggling.



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 01:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Molimo
reply to post by TNTarheel
 


Possible still not enough to state that its really him



Are these the "7 seals" revealed as 'beyond Einstein …
Open · Last updated: 9/15/2011 · 6 posts
I AM very disappointed in the answers given so far. Has anyone even bothered to go to the NASA website or 7seals.yuku.com... ? I bet not. You just voiced your ...

answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110912095904AAuLoKs · Cached page

search page



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 01:07 PM
link   
reply to post by TheSilentwalker
 


You mean the web of videos he keeps posting wasting our time?



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 01:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by TNTarheel
Interesting....

Record-7 Seals beyond Einstein theory

Are these the "7 seals" revealed as "beyond Einstien theory"?
edit on 9/22/2011 by TNTarheel because: spelling


Oh goodness!!

I went to that guy's website and he is claiming to be the Christ!

(YIKES!!!)

OiO



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 01:08 PM
link   
reply to post by TNTarheel
 


Ok hes a prime suspect



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 01:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheSilentwalker
reply to post by TNTarheel
 


True, sunshine.
However, opened is on another parallel vibe here.
Don't you people see the web you are indeed creating?

Mind. Boggling.


Hello, Silent


Forgive me if I do not enter into the fray. My time is short.

Peace to you.



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 01:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by 0pened
reply to post by TNTarheel
 


Just like Newton was proved to be incorrect, so will Einstein.

It takes time. We'll get there. It is a progression of understanding and experience.
edit on 22-9-2011 by 0pened because: (no reason given)


Einstein already knew he was incorrect. Spooky action at a distance really bothered him. Speaking of enigmas.



new topics

top topics



 
104
<< 632  633  634    636  637  638 >>

log in

join