It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New Creepy 10/28/11 Website Mystery

page: 470
104
<< 467  468  469    471  472  473 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:29 PM
link   
reply to post by KhaliWitch
 


have alook at its flickerstream,at the beginning we a garageband video, and he is apple related, so.....?
gn8
i am popping in if i feel news, since i am on the list, there is no other way to do that...




posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:31 PM
link   
reply to post by KhaliWitch
 


And that is precisely why we cannot take anything from 0pen seriously. We need to realize it ourselves.

We realize things not by reading or searching. Those experiences will not be found here-they come to us when we are ready.



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:33 PM
link   
*snip*
edit on 11-9-2011 by favouriteslave because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by onehuman
reply to post by 200457
 



THAT is very sweet! I am posting this video for you as I think folks really need to HEAR it.




Thank you so much! That is musical harmony.

If you listen, you can't but let your soul feel free.

Just another aspect of how beauty is all around us. We simply have to /listen/.



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by Druid42
Your /monad/ is an ambiguous term to me. Google tells me it is an individual unit. I can agree with the google definition, but when you incorporate intelligent design, and give the /monad/ an anthropomorphic aspect, I cannot help but ask you for clarification.

Our interactions with /reality/ are our /freewill/. Is the design by nature, or a result of our interactions? Do we see what we see in reality because we have the choice to, or is it nothing more than an illusion in our minds?

Please, elucidate your thoughts, as I think you are onto something there.


I had this document on my mind, having just read it earlier today:

www.scribd.com...

Yes it's long. You can jump to around page 40 to 54 and scan those page to get an idea what I was referring to.

Anthropomorphic effects don't bother me as much. I have spent lots of time pondering on that. Because "as above so below." We are truly created in "His" image and have potential to be Christs. (Please don't let my use of the religious terms throw you off -- this isn't about religion, it's just a useful language).

"Nothing more than illusion in our minds" -- hmm. Sort of. Except we're not talking about your brain or the wetware or anything 3D. As I said, you are the dot. I am the dot too. We're all dots. Formless eternal dots. More and more I am getting the impression that is the entire intent to this Oct28 exercise -- Open is trying to get us to step out of the confines of this reality and see that we are the dot. The formless dreamer who is imagining all of this, and through that imagining created all of this.

I apologize, I may not be explaining this all that well. Those who've also had this experience explain it much better. It's something hard to put into words and to describe to others. One of the reasons I am following along on this thread is because I still lack some missing bits of information. Basically I first had experience (without any drugs), without understanding. It was overwhelming and confusing. Ever since I have been trying to understand what happened and what it meant. While dipping my toe or a foot or a whole leg back into the experience now and then. But that's how I am... I don't like to be thrown suddenly into a pool of cold water -- which is what the universe did to me years and years ago. Nope, I'd rather ease into it slowly.

I think Open is encouraging us to understand the pool we are about to be thrown into, and to show us how to slowly dip ourselves gently into it beforehand, if we wish.

I'm sorry if this is vague.



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:37 PM
link   
reply to post by adraves
 


Then stop reading/searching/listing/digging this thread, move on, and apply your "super genius" skills elsewhere.



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:38 PM
link   
The last thing a fish notices is water



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:38 PM
link   
If I had to describe a term for 0pen in christian terms it would have be the anti-christ.


edit on 11-9-2011 by adraves because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:39 PM
link   
I must bid you all Good Night as it is getting quite late here and my husband is demanding attention from me, I don't want him to feel lonely so I will be back tomorrow round the afternoon!!

Namasté



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:40 PM
link   
lol

edit on 11-9-2011 by adraves because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:40 PM
link   
I have been trying to figure out what the numbers are on the new picture. I think I have a few of them, you have to look pretty closely, maybe they will help someone get a clue to whatever? I tried to make what I see at least below:





posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:41 PM
link   
I haven't read all of the new pages. What is the new image?



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by stonedlion

We're approaching Pi because that it was programmed that way.

Take our targetEpoch October 28th 2011 converted to milliseconds 1319774400000.

Once we reach our targetEpoch our equation will look like this:

Pi / 1319774400000 * 1319774400000 = Pi

Replacing the targetEpoch with any other date will yield the exact same results.

 

I'm not in any way discrediting your theory, in fact I actually like it a lot. However, just know that there's no significance to the third number, at least in a purely mathematical context, we're just dividing and multiply Pi by the same number.
edit on 9/11/2011 by stonedlion because: (no reason given)


Mathematically, it makes sense. It could have been any other number used in combination with Pi.
Maybe it's just an indirect way for Open to say that October 28 has a particular significance in relation to Pi?
A Pi within the infinite Pi, like a fractal...



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:43 PM
link   
reply to post by onehuman
 


Angles. 0, 30, 45, 60, 90, 180, 270, 360. Go back a few pages and you'll find a list of the Pi relation to those.
edit on 11-9-2011 by Fraam because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by onehuman
I have been trying to figure out what the numbers are on the new picture. I think I have a few of them, you have to look pretty closely, maybe they will help someone get a clue to whatever? I tried to make what I see at least below:




90 180 270..................right angles.

It was mapped out a few pages back. Go back and check.



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:45 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by onehuman
I have been trying to figure out what the numbers are on the new picture. I think I have a few of them, you have to look pretty closely, maybe they will help someone get a clue to whatever? I tried to make what I see at least below:




Have a look at page 465 of this thread.

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by ApolloEnigma
I haven't read all of the new pages. What is the new image?


check the 10 28 2011 page, you will see it



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by onehuman

Originally posted by sheba2011
This new image --

oct282011.com...

Perhaps it's blurred so we don't over-analyze it too much?

Or it's vibrating.


Could those points possibly be points on the zodiac wheel? When you look at a zodiac chart it can appear as pie in 12 equal parts. The number sequence said you must see the 4. There were 4 threes in the number.
4x3 equals 12. Also the four elements Fire, Water, Earth and Air..... All parts of nature. .... just thinking out loud pardon me!
edit on 11/9/11 by onehuman because: (no reason given)


I'm pretty sure it was you must see 4. Which is different than see THE four.

I am still confused about how everyone got 64 from this: 409233/3735 ...

Did anyone see my earlier post about what happens when you divide those two numbers? And then pop it all into wolfra-alpha as expression of time in milliseconds? How you get 109.567068 which if milliseconds is

~~ (0.4 to 0.5) × average human fingertip reaction time ( 0.2 to 0.25 s )
~~ (1.4 to 2.2) × blink of an eye ( 50 to 80 ms )

..... which relates directly to ... the images in manual #4...



posted on Sep, 11 2011 @ 05:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by snewpers
.
So uhm.... did I miss anything of importance that
would make me read the last twenty odd pages?
.


Nothing important at all, ol' buddy ol' pal!

As per your philosophy, we are still just running around in circles.

You know, the distance between two points IS a straight line, but It seems like we are now addressing a three dimensional realty. If you are familiar with Einstein/Rosenthal bridges, a straight line is not the shortest distance. Drink some milk, then re-join the discussion.



new topics

top topics



 
104
<< 467  468  469    471  472  473 >>

log in

join