Yep, typical vapor condensation slowly evaporating to the ground, nothing to see here, right?
Is it at least safe to say contrails/chemtrails whatever you wish to call it, they are at least altering the sky?
Is it safe to say that if planes weren't flying around patterns like this would probably not be seen in the skies?
And even if this was just natural condensation or natural formations of air vapor, how do you explain the studies done showing metals found in the air
higher than the normal limit?
The easiest thing to do is to shoot the messenger and blame it on the miscalculations of a kooky conspiracy theorist. Or you can say that planes
always leaves this kind of debris in the air, and isn't that worthy of investigating? Isn't this the green age where we are supposed to care about our
environment and want to clean up pollution? Or maybe the metals are not there from chemtrails at all and are from other things and the health limit is
just a way of making us feel safe.
And here is an interesting question-answer session from a chem-trail "insider" who gives a lot of information, you be the judge of its merit.
So, either the government is spraying chemtrails for some reason, or it's just a natural phenomenon, but one thing is clear, there is a chem trail
"movement" so to speak that is very interested in this area. So, the question is:
Why do you NOT want chem trails to be real?
And in case your reason is that because science is on your side, why is it that in the opening post from this thread asking "Why do you WANT
chemtrails to be real?" there are no facts given, no links, no arguments, just this:
A question for the chemtrail cult, why do you WANT chemtrails to be real? You constantly defend them, pick and choose "geo-engineering"
research as "chemtrail proof", and defy logic, reason, science, and high school level meteorology.
All for what? Why do you WANT them to be spraying?
Calling the opposition a "cult" saying it defies logic, with no argument or reason given as to why it defies logic, and insinuating sub-high school
level mentality from the defenders of the research. Does this sound like the arguments of a sound, logical thinker or rather something devoid of all
critical thought and just out to insult the opposition?
edit on 23-8-2011 by filosophia because: (no reason given)