Does Abu Ghraib report fault or clear U.S. command?

heres a great example of bias running rampant in the media...ill let the two articles speak for themselves...these are the actual headlines

Report on Iraq abuse cites interrogators, clears leaders

WASHINGTON � A new Army report on prisoner abuse by intelligence personnel at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison cites misconduct by military interrogators but exonerates high-ranking Pentagon officials and senior U.S. military commanders, a Pentagon official said Wednesday

U.S. Command Faulted in Abu Ghraib Probe -Paper

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. Army investigation into abuse at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq finds they resulted from failures of leadership at the highest levels of command, the Washington Post reported on Friday.

same report...two totally different conclusions...

funny huh?

[edit on 20-8-2004 by Creepy]

Put it this way, those who are the most guilty (i.e. Rumsfeld & crew) are absolved. Big surprise.

Cowards. They're more than willing to sacrifice those at the bottom of the food chain to save their own sorry a$$es when they know how guilty they are. It's those at the top who set the tone and policy. Rumsfeld is guilty as hell. He should be frog-marched in front the International Criminal Court.

Oh well, I betcha a year's pay God's got a special place in hell waiting for heir Rumfeld.