Mounting evidence of CIA ties to LIBYAN REBELS and why SYRIA AND IRAN IS NEXT

Numerous press reports over the weekend add to the evidence that the Libyan rebels fighting the regime of Muammar Gaddafi are under the direction of American intelligence agencies. Despite the repeated claims by Obama administration officials that the rebels are a largely unknown quantity, it is becoming increasingly clear that key military leaders of the anti-Gaddafi campaign are well known to the US government and have longstanding relations with the CIA.

For better than two weeks there had been a virtual ban in the US media on reporting the name of Khalifa Haftar, the long-time CIA collaborator who was appointed chief rebel commander March 17, on the eve of the US-NATO bombing campaign against Libya. Only the regional McClatchy Newspapers chain reported Haftar’s appointment, and ABC News ran a brief interview with him on March 27. Otherwise, silence prevailed.

empirestrikesblack.com...

And lookie, 3 important rebel leaders had ties with Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan as the Wall Street Journal so kindly shares with us:
Libyan Rebels have terrorist ties

Abdel Hakim al-Hasady, described as “an influential Islamic preacher and high school teacher who spent five years at a training camp in eastern Afghanistan” and now “oversees the recruitment, training and deployment of about 300 rebel fighters from Darna,” a city in eastern Libya
Salah al-Barrani, “a former fighter from the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, or LIFG,” who is Hasady’s field commander
Sufyan Ben Qumu, “a Libyan army veteran who worked for Osama bin Laden’s holding company in Sudan and later for an al Qaeda-linked charity in Afghanistan,” and who “is training many of the city’s rebel recruits.”
online.wsj.com...

For a decade, the US government, under Bush and now Obama, has used the terrorist actions of Al Qaeda and its alleged supporters as a pretext for one military intervention after another in the Muslim world—Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, the Philippines, Indonesia, Libya and now SYRIA and Iran in the future, is next on line.

West tells President Assad of Syria to resign

Syria is the only significant crude oil producing country in the Eastern Mediterranean region

Russian Diplomat reveals NATO plans to invade Syria and Iran + Other targets

Al Hakika website quoted from its reporter in Moscow that a high rank diplomat in the Russian delegation to NATO in Brussels revealed NATO'S plan to invade Syria. The diplomat said that NATO is searching in the Gulf region for a source to finance the plan. The head of the delegation General Dimitri Rozogin revealed in an interview with a Russian news agency on Friday NATO’s plan campaign in Syria” in order to topple Al Assad’s regime and establishing a coastal bridge that can be used later to attack Iran”. Read more

Nice to see all our tax payers dollars at work and soldiers lives on the line fighting illegal wars...

Just to solidify the point, Look at the 3rd picture from the bottom of all the 'rebels' in the back of the pickup truck, you can clearly see the guy on the right is a white man with a shaved head, looks pretty special forces'esq to me. He certainly isnt libyan ?

www.dailymail.co.uk...Just to solidify the fact, something interesting i noticed on the daily mail !

reply to post by Vanishr


HAHA! Good find!

He almost certainly looks European or American.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/47ff36912ffa.jpg[/atsimg]

reply to post by CasiusIgnoranze


In one thread you appear to be crticising the US / NATO for not doing enough to support the rebels
www.abovetopsecret.com...
then in this thread you seem to be criticising the US for providing Special Forces support.

Exactly what is your personal viewpoint?

It seems to me, and I accept I could easily be wrong, that you just want to criticise US policy regardless of what that policy may be.

reply to post by Freeborn


It Seems in the thread you have linked he is very anti Nato/US Involvement, it appears you have misinterpreted the OP.

reply to post by Freeborn


Its because current US policy is based on conquests by means of either illegal wars or indirectly allowing rebels to overthrow governments so that they can install puppets to do the bidding of the west.

reply to post by Vanishr


You could well be right, .....I'm sure the OP will clarify when he get's a chance.

I'm curious as to what people expect or want the UK / US / NATO etc to do...., people are quick to criticise but very slow to offer alternative policies and solutions etc.

reply to post by CasiusIgnoranze


So no matter what it does the US gets criticised....do nothing and they are manipulating to install puppet governents - intervene and they are conducting illegal wars.

There where a few threads on here a while back informing how the CIA was going in to support the rebels, but not classified as 'boots on the ground'. The main excuses include that they are covered by secrecy laws and are not subject to the usual rule of law.

reply to post by Freeborn


Damned if we do...
Damned if we don't...

It's obvious some here have Agendas and cannot maintain any sort of objectivity without letting their personal feelings get in the way.

It is what it is..

reply to post by Freeborn

.do nothing and they are manipulating to install puppet governents - intervene and they are conducting illegal wars.

And you think they havent? just look at Japan, all european leaders are now puppet governents to the west they dont care for there own nation nor its people,

intervene and they are conducting illegal wars

and you think america along with NATO doesnt?

Sorry Double post.

reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter


Sorry, don't want to burst the bigotted, narrow minded and ignorant bubble you appear to live in but the US / UK / 'The West' etc are most definately not responsible for all of the world's ill's .

You credit them with the ability and competency to control and manipulate world events when any examination of these governments and organisations reveals administrations of alarming incompetence.